Re: screen and tmux should be listed under the same category

2009-05-17 Thread Freddie Cash
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 5:08 PM, matt donovan wrote: > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 7:43 PM, matt donovan wrote: >> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Freddie Cash wrote: >>> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:38 PM, matt donovan >>> wrote: >>> > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Philip M. Gollucci >>> > wrote:

Re: [Call For Testing] VirtualBox for FreeBSD! take2

2009-05-17 Thread Greg Byshenk
On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 02:25:28AM +0200, Greg Byshenk wrote: > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 08:09:20PM +0200, Martin Wilke wrote: > > > > We rolled a new tarball with the patch from Juergen Lock [1] > > with a posible fix for AMD64 users, tested on 3 machines > > which now works without problems. Many

Re: [Call For Testing] VirtualBox for FreeBSD! take2

2009-05-17 Thread Glen Barber
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 2:09 PM, Martin Wilke wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > We rolled a new tarball with the patch from Juergen Lock [1] > with a posible fix for AMD64 users, tested on 3 machines > which now works without problems. Many Thanks to him for > his nice

Re: [Call For Testing] VirtualBox for FreeBSD! take2

2009-05-17 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 7:25 PM, Greg Byshenk wrote: > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 08:09:20PM +0200, Martin Wilke wrote: >> >> We rolled a new tarball with the patch from Juergen Lock [1] >> with a posible fix for AMD64 users, tested on 3 machines >> which now works without problems. Many Thanks to hi

Re: [Call For Testing] VirtualBox for FreeBSD! take2

2009-05-17 Thread Greg Byshenk
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 08:09:20PM +0200, Martin Wilke wrote: > > We rolled a new tarball with the patch from Juergen Lock [1] > with a posible fix for AMD64 users, tested on 3 machines > which now works without problems. Many Thanks to him for > his nice work! > > http://people.freebsd.org/~miw

Re: screen and tmux should be listed under the same category

2009-05-17 Thread matt donovan
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 7:43 PM, matt donovan wrote: > > > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Freddie Cash wrote: > >> On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:38 PM, matt donovan >> wrote: >> > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Philip M. Gollucci < >> pgollu...@p6m7g8.com>wrote: >> > >> >> Josh Rickmar wrote: >

Re: Pass mantainership of www/mod_authnz_external to other contributor

2009-05-17 Thread Philip M. Gollucci
Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Sun, 17 May 2009, Jose Garcia Juanino wrote: > >> Please, could any commiter pass the mantainership of >> www/mod_authnz_external port to the contributor CCed: Edmondas Girkantas >> ? >> >> I have contacted with him in private, and he is agree in take the >> mantainership.

Re: screen and tmux should be listed under the same category

2009-05-17 Thread matt donovan
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 2:37 AM, Freddie Cash wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:38 PM, matt donovan > wrote: > > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Philip M. Gollucci < > pgollu...@p6m7g8.com>wrote: > > > >> Josh Rickmar wrote: > >> > GNU screen is listed under sysutils, while tmux is listed unde

Re: Pass mantainership of www/mod_authnz_external to other contributor

2009-05-17 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Sun, 17 May 2009, Jose Garcia Juanino wrote: > Please, could any commiter pass the mantainership of > www/mod_authnz_external port to the contributor CCed: Edmondas Girkantas > ? > > I have contacted with him in private, and he is agree in take the > mantainership. > > Should I to submit a PR

Re: fftw3

2009-05-17 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Sun, 17 May 2009, eculp wrote: >> Perhaps helpful: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=38286 > > Thanks, at least I know it is broken or if not I'm not alone in thinking so. It's not broken; read down that page for the entire thread. You need to make sure gcc can find the assembler.

Re: fftw3

2009-05-17 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Sun, 17 May 2009 12:21:18 -0700 Kent Stewart wrote: > On Sunday 17 May 2009 11:38:34 am Kent Stewart wrote: > > On Sunday 17 May 2009 11:15:21 am Sahil Tandon wrote: > > > On Sun, 17 May 2009, Kent Stewart wrote: > > > > > I'm using today's current and just tried the following in > > > > > lan

Re: fftw3

2009-05-17 Thread eculp
Quoting Sahil Tandon : On Sun, 17 May 2009, eculp wrote: I'm using today's current and just tried the following in lang/gcc43 to hopefully be able to build ffw3 with the following made and resulting errors. # make WITHOUT_JAVA=yes ... checking whether ln -s works... yes checking for

Pass mantainership of www/mod_authnz_external to other contributor

2009-05-17 Thread Jose Garcia Juanino
Hi, Please, could any commiter pass the mantainership of www/mod_authnz_external port to the contributor CCed: Edmondas Girkantas ? I have contacted with him in private, and he is agree in take the mantainership. Should I to submit a PR? Best regards pgpbcvenFMCmi.pgp Description: PGP signatu

Re: [Call For Testing] VirtualBox for FreeBSD! take2

2009-05-17 Thread Benoit Calvez
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:10 PM, Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Martin Wilke wrote: > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > > > We rolled a new tarball with the patch from Juergen Lock [1] > > with a posible fix for AMD64 users, tested on 3 machin

Re: fftw3

2009-05-17 Thread Kent Stewart
On Sunday 17 May 2009 11:38:34 am Kent Stewart wrote: > On Sunday 17 May 2009 11:15:21 am Sahil Tandon wrote: > > On Sun, 17 May 2009, Kent Stewart wrote: > > > > I'm using today's current and just tried the following in lang/gcc43 > > > > to hopefully be able to build ffw3 with the following made

Re: [Call For Testing] VirtualBox for FreeBSD! take2

2009-05-17 Thread Sam Fourman Jr.
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 1:09 PM, Martin Wilke wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > We rolled a new tarball with the patch from Juergen Lock [1] > with a posible fix for AMD64 users, tested on 3 machines > which now works without problems. Many Thanks to him for > his nice

Re: fftw3

2009-05-17 Thread Kent Stewart
On Sunday 17 May 2009 11:15:21 am Sahil Tandon wrote: > On Sun, 17 May 2009, Kent Stewart wrote: > > > I'm using today's current and just tried the following in lang/gcc43 > > > to hopefully be able to build ffw3 with the following made and > > > resulting errors. > > > > > > # make WITHOUT_JAVA=ye

Re: fftw3

2009-05-17 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Sun, 17 May 2009, Kent Stewart wrote: > > I'm using today's current and just tried the following in lang/gcc43 > > to hopefully be able to build ffw3 with the following made and > > resulting errors. > > > > # make WITHOUT_JAVA=yes > > > > You really needed to man make. I did a "setenv WITHOUT

[Call For Testing] VirtualBox for FreeBSD! take2

2009-05-17 Thread Martin Wilke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 We rolled a new tarball with the patch from Juergen Lock [1] with a posible fix for AMD64 users, tested on 3 machines which now works without problems. Many Thanks to him for his nice work! http://people.freebsd.org/~miwi/vbox/virtualbox_2.tgz Mart

Re: fftw3

2009-05-17 Thread Kent Stewart
On Sunday 17 May 2009 07:21:17 am eculp wrote: > Quoting ajtiM : > > On Sunday 17 May 2009 03:14:12 Chris Rees wrote: > >> 2009/5/17 ajtiM : > >> > On Friday 15 May 2009 19:48:23 Sahil Tandon wrote: > >> >> On Fri, 15 May 2009, ajtiM wrote: > >> >> > pkgdb -F > >> >> > --->  Checking the package re

[CFT] FreeBSD python25 move to python26 as default version.

2009-05-17 Thread Martin Wilke
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 A few weeks ago I started the work on an update of lang/python26. With this update I want to move to python26 as the default python version. I've tested a lot of ports which work fine. I've given pav@ a patch for a exp-run, to check how many regression

Re: fftw3

2009-05-17 Thread Sahil Tandon
On Sun, 17 May 2009, eculp wrote: > I'm using today's current and just tried the following in lang/gcc43 to > hopefully be able to build ffw3 with the following made and resulting > errors. > > # make WITHOUT_JAVA=yes > > ... > > checking whether ln -s works... yes > checking for i386-po

Confused by CUPS version in ports/UPDATING

2009-05-17 Thread Leslie Jensen
Hello In ports/UPDATING it states 20090516: AFFECTS: users of print/cups-base and portupgrade AUTHOR: din...@freebsd.org print/cups has been splitten in mutiple ports. If upgrading from 1.9.10 and below you must remove the installed version first. I think I have the latest version of

Re: fftw3

2009-05-17 Thread eculp
Quoting ajtiM : On Sunday 17 May 2009 03:14:12 Chris Rees wrote: 2009/5/17 ajtiM : > On Friday 15 May 2009 19:48:23 Sahil Tandon wrote: >> On Fri, 15 May 2009, ajtiM wrote: >> > pkgdb -F >> > --->  Checking the package registry database >> > Stale dependency: akode-2.0.2,1 -> fftw3-3.1.3 (math/

Re: fftw3

2009-05-17 Thread N. Raghavendra
At 2009-05-17T09:14:12+01:00, Chris Rees wrote: > As in > > WITHOUT_JAVA=yes > > or > > WITHOUT_JAVA= yes > > ? > > You can't just stick random whitespace in the middle of things like that AFAIK, "VAR=val" is equivalent to "VAR = value", "VAR= value", etc. According to the section on va

Re: fftw3

2009-05-17 Thread ajtiM
On Sunday 17 May 2009 03:14:12 Chris Rees wrote: > 2009/5/17 ajtiM : > > On Friday 15 May 2009 19:48:23 Sahil Tandon wrote: > >> On Fri, 15 May 2009, ajtiM wrote: > >> > pkgdb -F > >> > --->  Checking the package registry database > >> > Stale dependency: akode-2.0.2,1 -> fftw3-3.1.3 (math/fftw3):

Re: OpenNMS 1.6.2 port

2009-05-17 Thread Sevan / Venture37
Sevan / Venture37 wrote: Port updated to v1.6.4 http://www.geeklan.co.uk/?p=132 http://www.geeklan.co.uk/files/opennms/opennms-164-freebsd-port.tgz Updated to 1.6.5 http://www.geeklan.co.uk/files/opennms/opennms-165-freebsd-port.tgz ___ freebsd-port

Re: [Call For Testing] VirtualBox for FreeBSD!

2009-05-17 Thread Glen Barber
On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 3:12 PM, Martin Wilke wrote: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > > Howdy Guys, > > After the announcement from Alexander Eichner about > Virtualbox on FreeBSD, we started the work on a port > for FreeBSD. Now we think that we solved the most > problems and

Re: [Call For Testing] VirtualBox for FreeBSD!

2009-05-17 Thread Greg Byshenk
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 07:16:13PM +0200, Benoit Calvez wrote: > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 11:49 PM, Benoit Calvez > wrote: > > On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 9:12 PM, Martin Wilke wrote: > >> After the announcement from Alexander Eichner about > >> Virtualbox on FreeBSD, we started the work on a port >

Re: databases/clip

2009-05-17 Thread Mark Linimon
On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 01:25:39PM +0600, Dmitry N. Kolesnikov wrote: > I need the databases/clip port updated to current (v. 1.2.0), can you please > do it? The "po...@freebsd.org" maintainer is the place-holder maintainer; that means no one is maintaining it. The best thing for you to do is to

Re: fftw3

2009-05-17 Thread Chris Rees
2009/5/17 ajtiM : > On Friday 15 May 2009 19:48:23 Sahil Tandon wrote: >> On Fri, 15 May 2009, ajtiM wrote: >> > pkgdb -F >> > --->  Checking the package registry database >> > Stale dependency: akode-2.0.2,1 -> fftw3-3.1.3 (math/fftw3): >> > Install stale dependency? ([y]es/[n]o/[a]ll) [yes] yes >

Re: cvs commit: ports/net Makefile ports/net/bwi-firmware-kmod Makefile distinfo pkg-descr pkg-plist

2009-05-17 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
On Sun, 17 May 2009 01:52:10 -0500 Scot Hetzel wrote: > On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 12:47 AM, Ion-Mihai Tetcu > wrote: > > On Sat, 16 May 2009 18:15:52 -0700 > > Doug Barton wrote: > > > >> Scot Hetzel wrote: > >> > This shouldn't be flaged as an mtree error.  The reason that > >> > linker.hints wa

databases/clip

2009-05-17 Thread Dmitry N. Kolesnikov
Hi, I need the databases/clip port updated to current (v. 1.2.0), can you please do it? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-ports-unsubscr...@freebs

Re: screen and tmux should be listed under the same category

2009-05-17 Thread Freddie Cash
On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 4:38 PM, matt donovan wrote: > On Sat, May 16, 2009 at 5:53 PM, Philip M. Gollucci > wrote: > >> Josh Rickmar wrote: >> > GNU screen is listed under sysutils, while tmux is listed under misc. >> > Shouldn't the two at least be in the same category, since they both do >> >