On 2009-Jan-10 07:22:21 -0800, Garrett Cooper wrote:
>I just started using portmaster this past week, and it appears to go a
>bit crazy removing dependencies -- there were a lot of libraries
>broken after removing dependencies that shouldn't have been. This
>could all be because of bad dependencie
On Sunday 11 January 2009 00:00:03 Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Dorian Büttner
wrote:
> > On Saturday 10 January 2009 21:03:55 Garrett Cooper wrote:
> >> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Matt wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Phil Oleson wrote:
> >> >> I
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 2:57 PM, Dorian Büttner wrote:
> On Saturday 10 January 2009 21:03:55 Garrett Cooper wrote:
>> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Matt wrote:
>> > On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Phil Oleson wrote:
>> >> I did run into a linking issue with the build of...errr kdebase,
>> >
Alexander Churanov píše v ne 11. 01. 2009 v 01:07 +0300:
> 2009/1/10 Pav Lucistnik
>
> Are you also willing to fix all the applications that will not
> work with
> the new version of boost?
>
> I understand that's the only concern preventing new bo
On Saturday 10 January 2009 21:03:55 Garrett Cooper wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Matt wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Phil Oleson wrote:
> >> I did run into a linking issue with the build of...errr kdebase,
> >> kdebase-runtime, or kdebase-workspace.. I cant remember now.
2009/1/10 Pav Lucistnik
>
> Are you also willing to fix all the applications that will not work with
> the new version of boost?
>
> I understand that's the only concern preventing new boost from being
> committed.
>
> Why not fix it in several steps? :
1) rename devel/boost to devel/boost-134
2)
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 10:50 AM, Matt wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Phil Oleson wrote:
>> I did run into a linking issue with the build of...errr kdebase,
>> kdebase-runtime, or kdebase-workspace.. I cant remember now.. but the
>> issue was with hspell. I had to rebuild it with this
On Sat, Jan 10, 2009 at 9:01 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> Michal Varga wrote:
>> Hello guys,
>> I noticed that Gnome 2.24 was commited today along with gnome-session
>> 2.24, so I need to ask - how did FreeBSD Gnome team decide to deal
>> with the recent session management ...
>
> FYI we don't use tha
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 12:39:50 -0600, Michal Varga
wrote:
Hello guys,
I noticed that Gnome 2.24 was commited today along with gnome-session
2.24, so I need to ask - how did FreeBSD Gnome team decide to deal
with the recent session management fuckup? I mean this:
Because we don't know about th
Michal Varga wrote:
> Hello guys,
> I noticed that Gnome 2.24 was commited today along with gnome-session
> 2.24, so I need to ask - how did FreeBSD Gnome team decide to deal
> with the recent session management ...
FYI we don't use that kind of language on our lists.
In any case it seems somethi
Garrett Cooper wrote:
> I just started using portmaster this past week, and it appears to go a
> bit crazy removing dependencies -- there were a lot of libraries
> broken after removing dependencies that shouldn't have been. This
> could all be because of bad dependencies in the Makefiles though.
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 5:33 AM, Phil Oleson wrote:
> I did run into a linking issue with the build of...errr kdebase,
> kdebase-runtime, or kdebase-workspace.. I cant remember now.. but the
> issue was with hspell. I had to rebuild it with this patch:
>
> --- Makefile.orig 2009-01-04 05:20:
Hello guys,
I noticed that Gnome 2.24 was commited today along with gnome-session
2.24, so I need to ask - how did FreeBSD Gnome team decide to deal
with the recent session management fuckup? I mean this:
http://np237.livejournal.com/22014.html
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=552387
http
Lowell Gilbert píše v so 10. 01. 2009 v 11:54 -0500:
> Is the Gnome update what caused this?
>
> Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait.."/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk", line 784:
> Inconsistent operator for post-install
> make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
> ===> editors/xemacs failed
>
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 11:42:48 -0600, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:54:42 -0600, Lowell Gilbert
wrote:
Is the Gnome update what caused this?
Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait.."/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk", line
784: Inconsistent operator for post-install
make: fatal err
On Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:54:42 -0600, Lowell Gilbert
wrote:
Is the Gnome update what caused this?
Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait.."/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk", line
784: Inconsistent operator for post-install
make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
===> editors/xemacs failed
*
Is the Gnome update what caused this?
Generating INDEX.tmp - please wait.."/usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gnome.mk", line 784:
Inconsistent operator for post-install
make: fatal errors encountered -- cannot continue
===> editors/xemacs failed
*** Error code 1
1 error
__
I got some feedback (in private mail), so I have updated my patch,
because the port was leaving traces behind.
I hope this is better.
See attachment.
--
Regards,
Torfinn Ingolfsen
===> Generating patch
===> Viewing diff with more
diff -ruN --exclude=CVS /usr/ports/net-p2p/amule2.org/Makefile /usr
Hi,
FWIW, this version of the setiathome port installed fine here. A few
things you can check:
- non-standard flags in /etc/make.conf
- unusual settings in environment
- use of a non-standard shell (for the user who is doing the install)
HTH
--
Regards,
Torfinn Ingolfsen
Alexander Churanov píše v so 10. 01. 2009 v 01:34 +0300:
> started with current boost-1.38. However I'm not sure that creating patches
> for 1.38 in time is valuable provided that it's not possible to check them
> in.
>
> Guys, is any other help necessary to make 1.37 ported?
Are you also willin
Hi,
I cannot install this version of setiathome. The setup script _autosetup
fails for make, m4 and pkg-config.
I took a peek in the file, and the way it checks for version seems to be at
fault. It runs each command with the flag --version
which is not a correct flag for neither make or m4. The fla
On Fri, Jan 9, 2009 at 8:05 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> Josh Rickmar wrote:
>> I'm hoping that this list covers port tools as well as the usual
>> discussions about the actual ports. If not, please CC this to the proper
>> list.
>>
>> I want to use pkg_delete to remove an installed port, but also wa
22 matches
Mail list logo
