Re: RFC: $USE_[GU]ID for consistent [GU]ID handling

"Florent Thoumie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote in <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: fl> There's an open PR with patches for this feature (ports/108514). Could fl> you have a look and maybe send your comments? Oh, sorry, I did not notice that. I will read the PR and follow-ups first. Thank you for the point

UNLIMITED Liberty Reserve ( LR ) for Sale!!!

UNLIMITED Liberty Reserve ( LR ) for Sale!!! We can provide you UNLIMITED Liberty Reserve for your need at the lowest rate. Just tell us how much LR you need and we will give you the best rate. Email me for more details [EMAIL PROTECTED] Or, chat with us via yahoo messenger ID: ( libertyrese

Re: Commit request ports/128241

On Tuesday 09 December 2008 12:37:26 Jonathan Chen wrote: > Hi, > > Would some kind committer please commit: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/128241 > > It's been on the wait queue for more than a month now. > > Cheers. It's already been committed. I'll check why the pr was

Re: Commit request ports/128241

Jonathan Chen píše v st 10. 12. 2008 v 10:37 +1300: > Would some kind committer please commit: > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/128241 > > It's been on the wait queue for more than a month now. Let me have a look. -- Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EM

Re: [PROPOSAL] Ports using SCM repositories as source instead of distfiles

* Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > No, those problems will not arise as long as the maintainer tests the > > port before submitting an update. And the tested port of fixed version > > will be usable for a long time, unlike SCM-based one which may break > > every second. > >

Commit request ports/128241

Hi, Would some kind committer please commit: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/128241 It's been on the wait queue for more than a month now. Cheers. -- Jonathan Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --

Re: [PROPOSAL] Ports using SCM repositories as source instead of distfiles

Dmitry Marakasov writes: > * Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> > - _Much_ more (instead of less) work for maintainer, as he won't be able >> > to test the port before committing it and will have to deal with all >> > the problems post factum, under extra pressure. >> >> >

Re: [PROPOSAL] Ports using SCM repositories as source instead of distfiles

* Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > - _Much_ more (instead of less) work for maintainer, as he won't be able > > to test the port before committing it and will have to deal with all > > the problems post factum, under extra pressure. > > > - Actually, any SCM-based port

Re: print/cm-super installation error

> [.. snip ..] > mktexlsr: Updating /usr/local/share/texmf/ls-R... > mktexlsr: Done. > Adding cm-super-t1.map... > *** Error code 1 [snip] > Is it a known error or is something misconfigured within my teTeX > installation? FWIW I get this too, also on 8.0-CURRENT. I have not investigated. --

Re: [PROPOSAL] Ports using SCM repositories as source instead of distfiles

Dmitry Marakasov writes: > * Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: >> I'm to proposing an enhancement to existing FreeBSD ports system. I >> think it'll be great if ports can use SCM (source code management) >> repositories like CVS, Subversion, Git, etc. as their sources instead of

Re: RFC: $USE_[GU]ID for consistent [GU]ID handling

On Sun, Dec 7, 2008 at 6:32 PM, Hiroki Sato <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hello, > > I would like your comments about the attached patch. This is for > adding USE_UID and USE_GID which allow uid/gid addition on > installation and the removal on deinstallation. It uses > ${PORTSDIR}/[GU]IDs for

Re: [PROPOSAL] Ports using SCM repositories as source instead of distfiles

* Ashish Shukla आशीष शुक्ल ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > I'm to proposing an enhancement to existing FreeBSD ports system. I > think it'll be great if ports can use SCM (source code management) > repositories like CVS, Subversion, Git, etc. as their sources instead of > distfiles. Following are som

[PROPOSAL] Ports using SCM repositories as source instead of distfiles

Hi all, I'm to proposing an enhancement to existing FreeBSD ports system. I think it'll be great if ports can use SCM (source code management) repositories like CVS, Subversion, Git, etc. as their sources instead of distfiles. Following are some of the {dis,}advantages of this approach: * Anyone

llvm-c++ fails to compile/link trivial c++ program

Hi, compiling the attached program test2.c++ using `llvm-c++ -Wall test2.c++` gives: /usr/bin/ld: BFD 2.15 [FreeBSD] 2004-05-23 assertion fail elf64-amd64-fbsd.c:2166 /usr/bin/ld: BFD 2.15 [FreeBSD] 2004-05-23 assertion fail elf64-amd64-fbsd.c:2166 Is our linker too old or is it a llvm-gcc bu

Re: RFC: $USE_[GU]ID for consistent [GU]ID handling

Hiroki Sato ha scritto: I would like your comments about the attached patch. Not tested, but it's a great idea. BTW, a lot of ports still check for / add www uid/gid, but actually we have such user in base system in all supported releases. Can/Should we drop such checks? -- Alex Dupre

print/cm-super installation error

Hi list, when I try to install the port print/cm-super from sources I get the following error on several machines: ===> Installing for cm-super-0.3.4 ===> cm-super-0.3.4 depends on executable: mktexlsr - found ===> Generating temporary packing list

Re: FreeBSD Port: php5-5.2.8

Vlad GURDIGA ha scritto: Do we have a "make test" for the lang/php5 port? Yes, but the message is printed by the php makefile, not port makefile. You have to know also that the suhosin patch will make a few tests failing. -- Alex Dupre ___ freebsd-

FreeBSD Port: php5-5.2.8

Hello! When I make install a port, I see something like: Build complete. Don't forget to run 'make test'. Do we have a "make test" for the lang/php5 port? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-port