On Wed, Oct 08, 2008 at 03:15:13PM +, JHutchinson wrote:
> ===> Building for nvidia-driver-173.14.12
> ===> src (all)
> "/sys/conf/kern.mk", line 114: Malformed conditional (${MK_SSP} != "no"
> && ${CC} != "icc" && ${MACHINE_ARCH} != "ia64" && ${MACHINE_ARCH} !=
> "arm" && ${MACHINE_ARCH}
[Gathering depends for x11/nvidia-driver
.
done]
[Exclude up-to-date packages .. done]
---> Checking for the latest package of 'x11/nvidia-driver'
---> Fetching the package(s
Hi, just a heads up -- claws-mail 3.6.0 was released on 2008-10-03,
approximately 5 days ago. The current version for mail/claws-mail is
3.5.0, released back in June.
Cheers
--
[SAS]_Spidey01
Warrant Officer Class 1
22nd Special Air Service EVR
__
インターネットで５日間で２０００万円以上、稼いだ人がいます。
その方法が無料レポートになりました。
http://my.formman.com/form/pc/vgjMlvJhHyJXzwmI/
無料でノウハウが手に入ります。
ぜひ手に入れて下さい。
必ず、役に立ちます。
■◇■◇■◇■◇■◇■◇■◇■◇■◇■◇■◇■◇■◇■■◇■◇■◇
発行者：山本隼人
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
[解除フォーム]
http://kaijo.oyakunitachimasu.com/2008/02/post.html
■◇■◇■◇■◇■◇■◇■◇■◇■◇■◇■◇■
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Steve Franks wrote:
> In maintaining devel/urjtag, I've added a dependancy to textproc/flex.
> On some systems, however, I've found that when textproc/flex gets
> installed, it lands in /usr/local/bin, as expected, but there's a
> /usr/bin/flex which
In maintaining devel/urjtag, I've added a dependancy to textproc/flex.
On some systems, however, I've found that when textproc/flex gets
installed, it lands in /usr/local/bin, as expected, but there's a
/usr/bin/flex which precedes it in the path - is there a canonical way
to resolve this? I've j
Hello,
On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 10:21 AM, Parv <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is your version of portupgrade is the latest in the ports? (So that
> I can install the same & investigate.)
Yes - always. I think I even stated in my first message that the ports
tree was updated.
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] por
Hi,
tried to compile petsc port and got an error:
...
===> Applying FreeBSD patches for petsc-mpich-2.3.3.p0_1,1
===> petsc-mpich-2.3.3.p0_1,1 depends on file: /usr/local/bin/python2.5 -
found
===> petsc-mpich-2.3.3.p0_1,1 depends on file: /usr/local/mpich2/bin/mpicc -
found
===> petsc-
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Not sure how well this work as a 'workaround', but, being as I use ZSH
as my shell, I always wrap anything I'm specifically upgrading using
portupgrade with single quotes. IE:
portupgrade -rR 'some-port-2.4.1_1' 'some-other-port-1.0.5_1,3'
I haven't
On 10/7/08, Cligny, Laurent <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I want to use open-vm-tools-nox11 on a 7.0-RELEASE box without using the
> port tree on it.
> So I wanted to build a package for this port on another 7.0-RELEASE
> machine, wiche have the port tree installed and up-to-date.
>
>
Hello,
I want to use open-vm-tools-nox11 on a 7.0-RELEASE box without using the
port tree on it.
So I wanted to build a package for this port on another 7.0-RELEASE
machine, wiche have the port tree installed and up-to-date.
But, here's what's happening with either "pkgcreate -p" or "make
package
I have the same trouble with portupgrade some times:
Am 07.10.2008 10:21 (UTC+1) schrieb Parv:
Mind that I am looking at the problem purely from a programmer's
perspective. I am a rather light user of portupgrade (mainly "pkgbd
-F") & don't upgrade the port itself much.
With that out of the wa
Mind that I am looking at the problem purely from a programmer's
perspective. I am a rather light user of portupgrade (mainly "pkgbd
-F") & don't upgrade the port itself much.
With that out of the way ...
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Torfinn Ingolfsen thusly...
>
> And here portupgrade
And here portupgrade fails again, on another machine:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] portupgrade -R nasm pcre xterm mplayer gscan2pdf ImageMagick
[Gathering depends for devel/nasm done]
[Exclude up-to-date packages done]
[Gathering depends for devel/pcre done]
[Exclude up-to-date packages done]
[Gathering
14 matches
Mail list logo
