FYI: These have been committed in FreeBSD ports tree. You now can run
'marcusmerge -U' to unmerge ports-stable and remove it. I will removing
everything in ports-stable tonight.
Cheers,
Mezz
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
FreeBSD GNOME Team
http://www.FreeBSD.org/gnome/ - [EMA
Information to obtain and pass your k53 learners test or drivers test is now
available on a new d.v.d. Time and financial resources has been spent on
fantastic animation so that you can learn through association while being
entertained.
The disc contains good music and is the most comprehen
Trying to build finance/gnucash (ports tree updated a couple of hours
ago) but it depends on www/gtkhtml38 which is marked as DEPRECATED with
the message to use www/gtkhtml3 instead.
Anyone know why gnucash hasn't been updated to deal with this? Is it OK
to just hack the gnucash Makefile to us
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 21:54:52 +0400
Sergey Matveychuk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Zane C.B. wrote:
> > When passing the '+CONTENTS' file for a installed package, what do
> > lines matching /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ mean past the first one? I know the first
> > one is the base, but what the ones after th
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:25:26 -0400
"Josh Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After some very helpful further discussions with Robert, I tried
> running "portmanger -u -p -l -y" to re-build everything, with no
> success. Further digging established that my pkg_info database was
> very confused. (F
On Mon, 30 Jun 2008 12:25:26 -0400
"Josh Hanson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> After some very helpful further discussions with Robert, I tried
> running "portmanger -u -p -l -y" to re-build everything, with no
> success. Further digging established that my pkg_info database was
> very confused. (F
Zane C.B. wrote:
When passing the '+CONTENTS' file for a installed package, what do
lines matching /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ mean past the first one? I know the first one
is the base, but what the ones after that for?
On a similar note, what are the lines matching /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ for?
I am seeing
When passing the '+CONTENTS' file for a installed package, what do
lines matching /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ mean past the first one? I know the first one
is the base, but what the ones after that for?
On a similar note, what are the lines matching /[EMAIL PROTECTED]/ for?
I am seeing both in '+CONTENTS
After some very helpful further discussions with Robert, I tried running
"portmanger -u -p -l -y" to re-build everything, with no success.
Further digging established that my pkg_info database was very confused.
(For example, pkg_info reported that cdrtools is required by xorg-server
and lots of x
On Fri, 27 Jun 2008 09:49:51 -0700 Jo Rhett wrote:
> So I pulled a fresh copy of the portsnap for cfengine port -- we are
> *STILL* on 2.2.3? How many years does it take to get a port updated?
Well, imho you'd better CC: to the port maintainer. In a week there
will be a maintainer timeout for PR
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 01:35:59PM +0200, Pieter Sybesma wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm getting this on compiling clamav:
>
> > cc -O -pipe -march=pentium4 -o .libs/clamscan output.o getopt.o cfgparser.o
> > misc.o options.o clamscan.o others.o manager.o tree
Hi,
I'm getting this on compiling clamav:
cc -O -pipe -march=pentium4 -o .libs/clamscan output.o getopt.o cfgparser.o
misc.o options.o clamscan.o others.o manager.o treewalk.o -L/usr/local/lib
../libclamav/.libs/libclamav.so
/usr/ports/security/clamav/work/clamav-0.93.1/libclamunrar_iface/.
Current FreeBSD problem reports
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including\nexperimental
development code and obsolete releases.\n
Bugs can be in one of several states:
o - open
A problem report has b
Hi,
here the compiled options for SAMBA:
# This file is auto-generated by 'make config'.
# No user-servicable parts inside!
# Options for samba-3.0.28a_2,1
_OPTIONS_READ=samba-3.0.28a_2,1
WITH_LDAP=true
WITH_ADS=true
WITH_CUPS=true
WITH_WINBIND=true
WITHOUT_ACL_SUPPORT=true
WITHOUT_FAM_SUPPORT=tr
On Mon, Jun 30, 2008 at 10:09:39AM +0200, Raffaele De Lorenzo wrote:
> Hi,
> i have some troubles with pam-winbind with this particular version
> ported. When i try to use the winbind pam authentication library i
> receive the error listed:
>
> Jun 27 14:17:48 X sshd[84691]: in openpam_load
Hi,
i have some troubles with pam-winbind with this particular version
ported. When i try to use the winbind pam authentication library i
receive the error listed:
Jun 27 14:17:48 X sshd[84691]: in openpam_load_module(): no
/usr/local/lib/pam_winbind.so found
Jun 27 14:17:48 X sshd[8
16 matches
Mail list logo
