Hi Gerg,
I will remove the costum one and try again.
thx alot!
Regards,
jyuny1
2008/6/24 Greg Larkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > From: Jyun-Yi Liou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > >
> > > 2008/6/20 Greg Larkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > > >
> > > > -Original Message-
> > > > From: [EMAIL PRO
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:56:40PM -0700, Greg Lewis wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:28:08PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> > Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
> > >On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:57:41AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
> > >>Alexey Shuvaev ha scritto:
> > >>>It seems I don't understand something here. C
On Sat, Jun 21, 2008 at 7:31 AM, coolix <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Carlos A. M. dos Santos wrote:
> > Hello,
> >
> > I have a brand new machine with 7.0-STABLE-200805 AMD64 (GENERIC
> > kernel). Today I installed all the required packages using "pkg_add
> > -r", including xfce-4.4.2. Now if I ru
> > From: Jyun-Yi Liou [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> >
> > 2008/6/20 Greg Larkin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > >
> > > -Original Message-
> > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jyun-Yi Liou
> > > Sent: Thursday, June 19, 2008 4:06 AM
> > > To: freebsd-ports@fre
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:28:08PM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
> >On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:57:41AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
> >>Alexey Shuvaev ha scritto:
> >>>It seems I don't understand something here. Can someone explain why
> >>>jdk ports need to set BUILD_DEPENDS on dia
On Jun 23, 2008, at 3:01 PM, Dale Hagglund wrote:
Thanks for the information. Did you compile via the port, or install
from the pre-built package? Since I have no immediate need for the
java
support that comes with lang/erlang, I uninstalled my modified version
and added erlang-{lite,doc}
Alexey Shuvaev wrote:
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:57:41AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
Alexey Shuvaev ha scritto:
It seems I don't understand something here. Can someone explain why
jdk ports need to set BUILD_DEPENDS on diablo-jdk15 unconditionally?
(nearly) every JDK port needs an already usable/i
> "Vivek" == Vivek Khera <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Vivek> erlang-r12b2,1 installed just fine on our 7.0/i386 box a
Vivek> couple of months ago. It was pulled in as a dependency of
Vivek> ejabberd automatically.
Thanks for the information. Did you compile via the port, or insta
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Jun 21, 2008, at 3:48 PM, Dale Hagglund wrote:
Am I missing something obvious here? Should I have been able to build
with the hipe extensions or is this an error in the port makefiles?
erlang-r12b2,1 installed just fine on our 7.0/i386 box a couple of
months ago. It was pulled in as a
INDEX build failed with errors:
Generating INDEX-6 - please
wait.."/a/erwin/tindex/ports/chinese/links/../../www/links/Makefile", line 75:
warning: duplicate script for target "pre-configure" ignored
ireport-3.0.0_1: "/a/erwin/tindex/ports/java/bsh" non-existent -- dependency
list incomplete
===
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 00:06:38 -0700
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Portmaster uses CONFLICTS to avoid this issue. This isn't the first
> time I've heard this complaint about the java ports. I'm wondering if
> glewis could shed some light on why they don't have proper CONFLICTS
> set.
>
>
Dirk Estenfeld wrote:
Hello,
is it planned to add bind95 to the ports?
Yes. Do you have plans that include using it, or are you asking out of
curiosity?
Doug
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/free
On Mon, 23 Jun 2008 10:57:41 +0200
Alex Dupre <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Alexey Shuvaev ha scritto:
> > It seems I don't understand something here. Can someone explain why
> > jdk ports need to set BUILD_DEPENDS on diablo-jdk15 unconditionally?
>
> (nearly) every JDK port needs an already usabl
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 02:06:59PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Alejandro Pulver <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 22.06.2008 01:54:38:
>
> > On Mon, 16 Jun 2008 18:03:45 +0200
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> >
> > > hi bsd port developer team,
> > >
> > > i installed and operate a dedicated wop
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 10:57:41AM +0200, Alex Dupre wrote:
> Alexey Shuvaev ha scritto:
>> It seems I don't understand something here. Can someone explain why
>> jdk ports need to set BUILD_DEPENDS on diablo-jdk15 unconditionally?
>
> (nearly) every JDK port needs an already usable/installed JDK t
Hello Ale,
thanx for your activity.
I update my local ports try to make install but cant fetch the file.
=> worldofpadman-1.2.20080621.tar.bz2 doesn't seem to exist in
/usr/ports/distfiles/.
=> Attempting to fetch from
ftp://ftp.FreeBSD.org/pub/FreeBSD/ports/distfiles/.
fetch:
ftp://ftp.FreeBS
Current FreeBSD problem reports
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including\nexperimental
development code and obsolete releases.\n
Bugs can be in one of several states:
o - open
A problem report has b
Hello,
is it planned to add bind95 to the ports?
best regards,
Dirk
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Alexey Shuvaev ha scritto:
It seems I don't understand something here. Can someone explain why
jdk ports need to set BUILD_DEPENDS on diablo-jdk15 unconditionally?
(nearly) every JDK port needs an already usable/installed JDK to
bootstrap the compilation. This is the reason of the BUILD_DEPEND
Hello!
On Mon, Jun 23, 2008 at 12:49:22AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> Alex Dupre wrote:
>> Doug Barton ha scritto:
>>> Portmaster uses CONFLICTS to avoid this issue.
>>
>> I can't see how CONFLICTS could solve this issue: we can install all
>> the JDKs together without problems
>
It seems I don't
Alex Dupre wrote:
Doug Barton ha scritto:
Portmaster uses CONFLICTS to avoid this issue.
I can't see how CONFLICTS could solve this issue: we can install all the
JDKs together without problems
I wasn't aware of that, thanks for letting me know.
I'll look into some solutions for this issue,
Doug Barton ha scritto:
Portmaster uses CONFLICTS to avoid this issue.
I can't see how CONFLICTS could solve this issue: we can install all the
JDKs together without problems (this is different from original bison
problem). The issue here is that the jdk port directory is not a
variable para
Doug Barton wrote:
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
Portmaster uses CONFLICTS to avoid this issue. This isn't the first
time I've heard this complaint about the java ports. I'm wondering if
glewis could shed some light on why they don't have proper CONFLICTS
set.
Because they don
Dominic Fandrey wrote:
Doug Barton wrote:
Portmaster uses CONFLICTS to avoid this issue. This isn't the first
time I've heard this complaint about the java ports. I'm wondering if
glewis could shed some light on why they don't have proper CONFLICTS set.
Because they don't conflict. /usr/loc
Doug Barton wrote:
Alex Dupre wrote:
Peter Jeremy wrote:
Firstly, I have jdk-1.5.0.14p8,1 installed and this needs updating.
portmaster has decided that doing so requires java/diablo-jdk15 to be
installed - which is wrong because I already have a suitable jdk
installed.
You are right, but the
Alex Dupre wrote:
Peter Jeremy wrote:
Firstly, I have jdk-1.5.0.14p8,1 installed and this needs updating.
portmaster has decided that doing so requires java/diablo-jdk15 to be
installed - which is wrong because I already have a suitable jdk
installed.
You are right, but the port has the follow
27 matches
Mail list logo
