> I'd like to remove these ports with openoffice.org-1.0 in June...
> Any comments?
I see no reason not to, and good reasons (cluster build time) to
proceed.
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebs
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: FreeBSD ports that you maintain which are currently marked broken
Date: Wed, 21 May 2008 15:54:14 +0200 (CEST)
> portname: editors/openoffice.org-1.1
> broken because: fails to install; consider upgrading to
> editors/openoffice.or
On Sun, 25 May 2008 15:24:01 -0400 (EDT)
Tuc at T-B-O-H <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Just a bit of an update.. I'm not sure if you follow the DSS
> list. (I get it, may not always READ it, but I get it)... It turns out
> Stephen Tonna announced the release about 28 hours before your email
> t
Hi,
Just a bit of an update.. I'm not sure if you follow the DSS
list. (I get it, may not always READ it, but I get it)... It turns out
Stephen Tonna announced the release about 28 hours before your email
to the list. I find it difficult that given the holiday weekend, you
didn't allow nor
> | I'm also having the same problem building on
> | FreeBSD/AMD64 8-CURRENT. I commented out the entries
> | I had in ports.conf for this port, and checked CFLAGS:
> |
> | # cd /usr/ports/print/ghostscript-gpl
> | # make -V CFLAGS
> | -O2 -pipe -fno-strict-aliasing
> |
> | And the port fails the
