On 3/2/08, Doug Hardie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Adding ports to FreeBSD 7 I normally build from source and create a
> package. With previous versions the created packages went into /usr/
> ports/packages/All. However the packages directory was not created on
> a new installation. The pack
Zitiere Olivier Cochard-Labbe vom Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 11:22:12AM +0100:
> Hi,
>
> 2008/2/23, Dierk Sacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > Are you able to transfer let's say the content of /usr/local/bin to it?
> > I'm still able to deadlock the whole vfs by doing something like that.
>
>
> I've ju
Adding ports to FreeBSD 7 I normally build from source and create a
package. With previous versions the created packages went into /usr/
ports/packages/All. However the packages directory was not created on
a new installation. The packages were being built in the ports top
level directory
Stuart Barkley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 at 16:05 +0100, Helmut Schneider wrote:
I have a few problems with portupgrade, some ports fail with error above:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# portupgrade -fPP snort-2.7.0.1_1 postfix-2.4.6,1
apache-2.0.63 ** Listing the failed packages (-:
Stuart Barkley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 at 16:05 +0100, Helmut Schneider wrote:
I have a few problems with portupgrade, some ports fail with error above:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# portupgrade -fPP snort-2.7.0.1_1 postfix-2.4.6,1
apache-2.0.63 ** Listing the failed packages (-:
the qemu list.
(will crosspost to -emulation.)
Anyway the update is here (also queued on tb3):
http://people.freebsd.org/~nox/qemu/qemu-devel-20080302.patch
enjoy,
Juergen
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.
On Sat, 1 Mar 2008 at 16:05 +0100, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> I have a few problems with portupgrade, some ports fail with error above:
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]# portupgrade -fPP snort-2.7.0.1_1 postfix-2.4.6,1
> apache-2.0.63
> ** Listing the failed packages (-:ignored / *:skipped / !:failed)
>
On Fri, Feb 29, 2008 at 01:31:18PM -0500, Chuck Robey wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Brodey Dover wrote:
> > So I'm reading your response and thinking, okay I'll do this tomorrow.
> > But then you mentioned, "that is not your error...but." I can program,
> > what the
Steven Hartland wrote:
Would fix this particular package but again: how many others
do this? Maybe this is something that BSDPAN could / should
override?
It might be possible, you should talk to the BSDPAN maintainer.
Kris
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.
