On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 10:17:04PM -0800, comperr wrote:
> What you package a port properly (with the shell archive and such)
> what is the usual response time you get until a comitter sees it and
> commits it?
There isn't a "usual" response time. It can run from a few days to a
number of months.
in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
wrote Felippe de Meirelles Motta thusly...
>
...
> Well ... I like normal user, I always get much the lastest version
> of the software to use. But I as a developer, with the minimal
> version required (core-mod or no) is ok.
Interesting, as I would have thought the
Hi, I'm new to the package maintenance thing. I have a few questions.
What you package a port properly (with the shell archive and such)
what is the usual response time you get until a comitter sees it and
commits it?
Also - beyond the 'send-pr' what else has to be done on the
maintainers part?
__
Shaun Amott wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:57:06PM -0600, Kelly Hays wrote:
>> I was wondering what plans were in the works for net-im/psi version
>> 0.11 and/or development snapshots of 0.12?
>>
>
> I'll be updating the port to 0.12 shortly. I have some additional
> testing to do. I currentl
Wesley Shields wrote:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 03:27:07PM -0800, Yen-Ming Lee wrote:
[cc to the submitter of ports/120802 and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2008/2/23, Wesley Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 04:50:16PM -0500, Randy Pratt wrote:
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:26:5
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 03:27:07PM -0800, Yen-Ming Lee wrote:
> [cc to the submitter of ports/120802 and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> 2008/2/23, Wesley Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> >
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 04:50:16PM -0500, Randy Pratt wrote:
> > > On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:26:53 -0500
> > > Wesley S
[cc to the submitter of ports/120802 and [EMAIL PROTECTED]
2008/2/23, Wesley Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 04:50:16PM -0500, Randy Pratt wrote:
> > On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:26:53 -0500
> > Wesley Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 03:59:11
On Fri, Feb 22, 2008 at 11:57:06PM -0600, Kelly Hays wrote:
>
> I was wondering what plans were in the works for net-im/psi version
> 0.11 and/or development snapshots of 0.12?
>
I'll be updating the port to 0.12 shortly. I have some additional
testing to do. I currently have no plans to do do a
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 04:50:16PM -0500, Randy Pratt wrote:
> On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:26:53 -0500
> Wesley Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 03:59:11PM -0500, Randy Pratt wrote:
> > > I've been using portmaster for a couple of weeks and like what I've
> > > seen. Ho
On Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:26:53 -0500
Wesley Shields <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 03:59:11PM -0500, Randy Pratt wrote:
> > I've been using portmaster for a couple of weeks and like what I've
> > seen. However, I'm a bit confused on how dependencies changes are to
> > be handl
On Sat, Feb 23, 2008 at 03:59:11PM -0500, Randy Pratt wrote:
> I've been using portmaster for a couple of weeks and like what I've
> seen. However, I'm a bit confused on how dependencies changes are to
> be handled. Here's a scenario:
>
> Events:
>
> 2008.02.17 01:50:08 UTC devel/p5-ExtUtils-C
I've been using portmaster for a couple of weeks and like what I've
seen. However, I'm a bit confused on how dependencies changes are to
be handled. Here's a scenario:
Events:
2008.02.17 01:50:08 UTC devel/p5-ExtUtils-CBuilder: update to 0.22
2008.02.17 11:00:00 UTC update ports and devel/p5
Hey,
Do you plan on adding GRUB 2 to the ports collection? GRUB Legacy is not
actively developed anymore, as you may have noticed.
Btw, GRUB 2 added support for UFS and loaders for *BSD kernels recently.
--
Robert Millan
I know my rights; I want my phone call!
What use is a phone call… if
13 matches
Mail list logo
