Different variants of the same package on ftp.FreeBSD.org

2008-01-30 Thread Lena
Hi, ~ $ host ftp.freebsd.org ftp.freebsd.org has address 204.152.184.73 ftp.freebsd.org has address 62.243.72.50 ftp.freebsd.org has IPv6 address 2001:6c8:6:4::7 ftp.freebsd.org has IPv6 address 2001:4f8:0:2::e ~ $ echo -e "dir mathopd*\nquit" | ftp ftp://204.152.184.73/pub/FreeBSD/ports/i386/pac

Re: ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel

2008-01-30 Thread NAKAJI Hiroyuki
Hi, I have another error with portupgrade-devel-2.4.1. # portupgrade -a ... ** Port directory not found: japanese/dpkey7 /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:1357:in `get_pkgname': port directory error (PortDirError) from /usr/local/sbin/portupgrade:623:in `main' from /usr/local/sbin/port

Re: Possibly unbuildable ports reminder

2008-01-30 Thread Kris Kennaway
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: Wesley Shields wrote: On Mon, Jan 28, 2008 at 07:45:09AM -0600, Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote: Bill Fenner wrote: Dear porters, This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of unbuildable ports at http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ . A

Re: cacti broken in 6.3?

2008-01-30 Thread Helmut Schneider
Edwin Groothuis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 10:22:31PM +0100, Helmut Schneider wrote: I started a long thread at http://forums.cacti.net/about25481.html but it turns out that FreeBSD 6.3 might be the problem. FreeBSD 6.2 and 7.0-RC1 (see below) are not affected. Here is

Re: cacti broken in 6.3?

2008-01-30 Thread Edwin Groothuis
On Wed, Jan 30, 2008 at 10:22:31PM +0100, Helmut Schneider wrote: > I started a long thread at http://forums.cacti.net/about25481.html but it > turns out that FreeBSD 6.3 might be the problem. FreeBSD 6.2 and 7.0-RC1 > (see below) are not affected. Here is what I did: Silly question from me mayb

cacti broken in 6.3?

2008-01-30 Thread Helmut Schneider
Hi, I started a long thread at http://forums.cacti.net/about25481.html but it turns out that FreeBSD 6.3 might be the problem. FreeBSD 6.2 and 7.0-RC1 (see below) are not affected. Here is what I did: I had an existing cacti infrastructure/cacti server on FreeBSD 6.2. Everything was fine and

ssldump fails to compile

2008-01-30 Thread Jukka A. Ukkonen
The subject should already tell the most important news. Find below the error messages shown by the compiler... cc -O2 -pipe -O2 -pipe -DHAVE_LIBM=1 -DHAVE_SYS_TIME_H=1 -DSTDC_HEADERS=1 -DTIME_WITH_SYS_TIME=1 -DSIZEOF_UNSIGNED_SHORT=2 -DSIZEOF_UNSIGNED_INT=4 -DSIZEOF_UNSIGNED_LONG

Re: USE_GNOME and imlib2

2008-01-30 Thread Pav Lucistnik
Andriy Gapon píše v st 30. 01. 2008 v 16:47 +0200: > There is graphics/imlib2 port, but there is no way to specify a > dependency on it via USE_GNOME variable. bsd.gnome.mk knows only about > graphics/imlib port, which has GTK1 dependencies. So, no shortcuts for > GTK1-free environment. > Or am I

USE_GNOME and imlib2

2008-01-30 Thread Andriy Gapon
There is graphics/imlib2 port, but there is no way to specify a dependency on it via USE_GNOME variable. bsd.gnome.mk knows only about graphics/imlib port, which has GTK1 dependencies. So, no shortcuts for GTK1-free environment. Or am I missing something? -- Andriy Gapon

Re: Ports package: m4-1.4.9,1.tbz

2008-01-30 Thread Wesley Shields
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 11:25:05PM -0600, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > I wanted to install the following port: m4-1.4.9,1.tbz > > I found that this port contains a comma. This typically isn't a character > included in package names, and suspect that something is wrong. Is this > the appropriate l

Re: /usr/bin/objformat is missing

2008-01-30 Thread Peter Jeremy
On Tue, Jan 29, 2008 at 01:24:49PM -0800, Chris H. wrote: >cc: --export-dynamic: linker input file unused because linking not done >But of course, it's just a harmless "informative" message. The -Wl,--export-dynamic should be in LDFLAGS, not CFLAGS. There's no guarantee that CFLAGS is passed to t