Quoting "Sam Fourman Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Wed, 16 Jan 2008
14:22:41 -0600):
I guess i am a bit confused, did someone in fact get flash9 working in
RELENG_7 or -CURRENT?
There are known problems. Something is buggy in the kernel. We don't
know what the exact problem is, nobody had
Quoting Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from Wed, 16 Jan 2008
14:34:23 -0500):
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Boris Samorodov wrote:
On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:10:15 -0500 Chuck Robey wrote:
All those libraries need to be found
by the flash9 plugin library.
Please, give me st
--- Chuck Robey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Boris Samorodov wrote:
> > On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:10:15 -0500 Chuck Robey wrote:
> >
> >> All those libraries need to be found
> >> by the flash9 plugin library.
> >
> > Please, give me strict inst
Thanks, I fixed that, but it still does not appear to be checking the
dependancy. It fails with the same error.
On Jan 16, 2008 2:03 PM, Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> --On Wednesday, January 16, 2008 09:08:12 -0500 Jim Stapleton
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
> > Sorry I tabbed in ed
At 11:55 PM 1.16.2008 +0100, Jose Garcia Juanino wrote:
>El miércoles 16 de enero a las 23:32:36 CET, Jack L. Stone escribió:
>>
>> My checksums were different because the ones in the port did not match. So,
>> I ran "make makesum" which eliminated the mismatch, but still had the above
>> archive
El miércoles 16 de enero a las 23:32:36 CET, Jack L. Stone escribió:
>
> My checksums were different because the ones in the port did not match. So,
> I ran "make makesum" which eliminated the mismatch, but still had the above
> archive issue.
>
> I used your checksums and am back to the mismatch
On Wednesday 16 January 2008 20:03:29 Paul Schmehl wrote:
> --On Wednesday, January 16, 2008 09:08:12 -0500 Jim Stapleton
>
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sorry I tabbed in editing and managed to accidentally sent.
> >
> > Is it safe to assume that it is not bailing on the lack of this
> > librar
On Wed, 16 Jan 2008 16:32:36 -0600, Jack L. Stone
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
At 11:25 PM 1.16.2008 +0100, Jose Garcia Juanino wrote:
El miércoles 16 de enero a las 22:36:40 CET, Jack L. Stone escribió:
FBSD-6.2p10
Am trying to build php5 which depends on libxml2, but can't get past
the
b
At 11:25 PM 1.16.2008 +0100, Jose Garcia Juanino wrote:
>El miércoles 16 de enero a las 22:36:40 CET, Jack L. Stone escribió:
>> FBSD-6.2p10
>>
>> Am trying to build php5 which depends on libxml2, but can't get past the
>> build error below.
>>
>> Any help appreciated.
>>
>> ===> Extracting for
El miércoles 16 de enero a las 22:36:40 CET, Jack L. Stone escribió:
> FBSD-6.2p10
>
> Am trying to build php5 which depends on libxml2, but can't get past the
> build error below.
>
> Any help appreciated.
>
> ===> Extracting for libxml2-2.6.30
> => MD5 Checksum OK for gnome2/libxml2-2.6.30.ta
FBSD-6.2p10
Am trying to build php5 which depends on libxml2, but can't get past the
build error below.
Any help appreciated.
===> Extracting for libxml2-2.6.30
=> MD5 Checksum OK for gnome2/libxml2-2.6.30.tar.gz.
=> SHA256 Checksum OK for gnome2/libxml2-2.6.30.tar.gz.
tar: Unrecognized archive
hi
I've installed linux-sun-jre16 on my freeBSD 6.2-RELEASE-p9, but the java
plugin doesn't work with linux-seamonkey !
# cd /usr/ports/java/linux-sun-jre16
# make install clean
# cd /usr/ports/www/linux-seamonkey
# make install clean
# ln -s /usr/X11R6/linux-sun-jre1.6.0/plugin/i386/ns7/libjav
I guess i am a bit confused, did someone in fact get flash9 working in
RELENG_7 or -CURRENT?
Sam Fourman Jr.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROT
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Boris Samorodov wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Jan 2008 16:10:15 -0500 Chuck Robey wrote:
>
>> All those libraries need to be found
>> by the flash9 plugin library.
>
> Please, give me strict instructions how to repeate (what to do
> after a fresh install):
> -
On Jan 15, 2008, at 16:29 , Dmitry Marakasov wrote:
Hi!
Another question: I'm going to make a port based on SVN revision of
certain software - what PORTVERSION should I use? Authors suggested
"r${REVISION}", but that seem uncommon for FreeBSD ports, so I think
more of "0.0.${REVISION}". Any ex
--On Wednesday, January 16, 2008 09:08:12 -0500 Jim Stapleton
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Sorry I tabbed in editing and managed to accidentally sent.
Is it safe to assume that it is not bailing on the lack of this
library because there is no devel/py-extended-threading yet, or am I
missing some
* Dmitry Marakasov ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> The question is: does FreeBSD port fall under `derivative work'?
> I.e. may the data files be installed by it (or should I ask users
> to download files themselves instead) and may the package of such
> a port be created? Port does not modify any dat
Sorry I tabbed in editing and managed to accidentally sent.
Is it safe to assume that it is not bailing on the lack of this
library because there is no devel/py-extended-threading yet, or am I
missing something else.
Sorry again for the goof/double-message.
Thank you,
-Jim Stapleton
Makefile:
I'm having trouble getting a requirement to work. I'm trying to build
the port I'm developing without the dependancy installed, expecting to
get a related error. This looks like what I've seen in other ports,
and what I've seen in the documentation but it does not function in
mine:
BUILD_DEPENDS+=
Hi
1. We can get ready to buy clients for your products. We can bring such people,
who are searching at google for following
keywords. They are ready to buy clients and they are searching these products
to make a purchase. If they reach at your
site at this time, chances are very great that you
20 matches
Mail list logo
