Re: Appropriate way of submitting multiple related ports at once?

2007-10-19 Thread Doug Barton
On Sat, 20 Oct 2007, Edwin Groothuis wrote: Hello Quinton, On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 11:49:55PM +1000, Q wrote: I have written a collection of ports (16 in total) for building a typical Apple WebObjects deployment environment. As most of these ports depend on one another in some way could someon

Re: Appropriate way of submitting multiple related ports at once?

2007-10-19 Thread Edwin Groothuis
On Sat, Oct 20, 2007 at 08:24:05AM +1000, Edwin Groothuis wrote: > Or, if you have spare time and a network connection (I think that > the last pre-requisite is pretty dumb :-) drop by on #bsdcode at > irc.efnet.org and ask if somebody wants to help you getting these > PRs done. #bsdports that is.

Re: Appropriate way of submitting multiple related ports at once?

2007-10-19 Thread Edwin Groothuis
Hello Quinton, On Wed, Oct 17, 2007 at 11:49:55PM +1000, Q wrote: > I have written a collection of ports (16 in total) for building a > typical Apple WebObjects deployment environment. As most of these > ports depend on one another in some way could someone advise what the > most appropriate

devel/pear-1.6.2

2007-10-19 Thread Doug Sampson
I'm having trouble installing/upgrading devel/pear-1.6.2 as follows: corvus-root@/usr/ports/devel/pear: make install ===> Installing for pear-1.6.2 ===> pear-1.6.2 depends on file: /usr/local/include/php/main/php.h - found ===> pear-1.6.2 depends on file: /usr/local/lib/php/20060613/pcre.so -

FreeBSD Port: rhythmbox-0.10.1_3

2007-10-19 Thread Roberth Sjonøy
Please update rhythmbox. Regards, Roberth. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: ports/117324: devel/sourcenav can't build

2007-10-19 Thread ru
Synopsis: devel/sourcenav can't build Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-i386->freebsd-ports Responsible-Changed-By: ru Responsible-Changed-When: Fri Oct 19 14:23:04 UTC 2007 Responsible-Changed-Why: Fix category. http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=117324 __

Re: The scandalous status of linux-flashplugin9

2007-10-19 Thread Roman Divacky
On Thu, Oct 18, 2007 at 07:02:47PM -0700, Zephiris wrote: > Sam Fourman Jr. wrote: > > > > I too am confused, if you have flash 9 working in firefox on RELENG_7 > > please give us a detailed how to there are just a TON of people > > looking for this. I have 5 systems I would test it out on right n