Properly supporting devfs(8) rules in rc-scripts

I've set up isc-dhcpd to run chroot(2)ed, and I noticed that the port's rc-script does not currently support devfs rulesets (so, by default, none of the device nodes are hidden within the chroot environment). Attached is a diff to introduce a variable, dhcpd_devfs_ruleset, to be applied within the

Re: Updating X.org FreeBSD ports to 7.3

On Saturday 08 September 2007, Robert C. Noland III said: > On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 15:34 +0200, Fabian Keil wrote: > > Florent Thoumie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > As some of you may know already, X.org released X11R7.3 > > > yesterday. Since we already made the move to modular ports for > > > 7

Installing KLD modules on AMD64

FYI: According to ports/100703 and ports/115517, the macro INSTALL_PROGRAM corrupts .ko files on AMD64 machines: You cannot strip kernel modules on amd64, because modules are elf object files, as opposed to shared objects on all other archs. Strip strips the object file symbol table,

Re: bsd.port.options.mk status

Dmitry Marakasov píše v po 10. 09. 2007 v 02:01 +0400: > > > So, is it possible to use this feature, or are there still any issues > > > not allowing use of options.mk in ports? > > It's possible to use this feature, but only on -CURRENT and -STABLE > > FreeBSD systems newer than certain date. No

Re: bsd.port.options.mk status

* Pav Lucistnik ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote: > > CHANGES of 20060930 state that exeperimental bsd.port.options.mk has > > been added for OPTIONS to be able to influence dependencies. I need that > > feature for some of my ports, so I wanted to know what's the status for > > it? > > > > .include doe

Re: bsd.port.options.mk status

Dmitry Marakasov píše v ne 09. 09. 2007 v 23:46 +0400: > CHANGES of 20060930 state that exeperimental bsd.port.options.mk has > been added for OPTIONS to be able to influence dependencies. I need that > feature for some of my ports, so I wanted to know what's the status for > it? > > .include do

Your invitation from Mayank Jain is about to expire

Hello, On Aug 18, 2007, Mayank Jain sent you an invitation to get jaxtr. On Thursday (Sep 13), this invitation will expire. Follow this link to get jaxtr: http://www.jaxtr.com/user/ticket?n=Tljq0qj8s7r06&type=joininvite Signing up is free and takes less than a minute. -- This is

bsd.port.options.mk status

Hi! CHANGES of 20060930 state that exeperimental bsd.port.options.mk has been added for OPTIONS to be able to influence dependencies. I need that feature for some of my ports, so I wanted to know what's the status for it? .include doesn't work, but using full path works, and makes it possible to

Re: request: Port of 'miro' player

Le Dim 9 sep 07 à 19:16:42 +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait : > >I have uploaded the latest version at > > > > > Hi Thierry, Hello, > I just gave the port a try on up-to-date RELENG and it compiles > without issue b

Zend Studio V5

Hi, I was wondering if there where any plans to include Zend Studio to the ports ? The reason i ask is because Zend Optimizer and Zend Framework is already available, but Zend Studio is not. Best Regards, Patrick ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing l

Re: Re: request: Port of 'miro' player

Quoting Thierry Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: Le Mar 21 aoû 07 à 21:54:28 +0200, Samira Nox <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait : Hi, Hello, Thank you very much. After adjusting one line in the Makefile [WRKSRC] it compiled. And seems to work. I have uploaded the latest version at

Re: any standard method to fetch a port's sources from svn (or cvs, etc) ?

Le Dim 9 sep 07 à 17:56:05 +0200, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> écrivait : > It is recommended not to do this. Some of our users are behind > firewalls and cannot fetch except via HTTP and FTP. Instead, you need > to create your own tarball of the sources checked out from the VCS, > pos

Re: any standard method to fetch a port's sources from svn (or cvs, etc) ?

On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 05:56:05PM +0200, Kris Kennaway wrote: > Luigi Rizzo wrote: > > as the subject says, i was wondering if there is any standard method > > to fetch the sources for a port from a Subversion (or CVS or other > > scm) repository. > > > > Right now i am doing it with the followin

Re: any standard method to fetch a port's sources from svn (or cvs, etc) ?

Luigi Rizzo wrote: as the subject says, i was wondering if there is any standard method to fetch the sources for a port from a Subversion (or CVS or other scm) repository. Right now i am doing it with the following sequence (the use of update vs checkout is because originally i fetched into dist

any standard method to fetch a port's sources from svn (or cvs, etc) ?

as the subject says, i was wondering if there is any standard method to fetch the sources for a port from a Subversion (or CVS or other scm) repository. Right now i am doing it with the following sequence (the use of update vs checkout is because originally i fetched into distfiles, not ${WRKSRC},

Re: Updating X.org FreeBSD ports to 7.3

Robert C. Noland III schreef: > On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 17:39 -0400, Robert C. Noland III wrote: >> On Sat, 2007-09-08 at 15:34 +0200, Fabian Keil wrote: >>> Florent Thoumie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> As some of you may know already, X.org released X11R7.3 yesterday. Since we already m

Re: apache-2.0.61?

Am 09.09.2007 um 13:54 schrieb Clement Laforet: Hi ! On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 01:16:41PM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote: is there any particular reason why the port hasn't been updated to 2.0.61 yet? I'm currently working on it (and apache 2.2.6). It should be committed in the next hours. Cool,

Re: apache-2.0.61?

Hi ! On Sun, Sep 09, 2007 at 01:16:41PM +0200, Stefan Bethke wrote: > is there any particular reason why the port hasn't been updated to > 2.0.61 yet? I'm currently working on it (and apache 2.2.6). It should be committed in the next hours. clem pgpzgyky1GVam.pgp Description: PGP signature

apache-2.0.61?

Hi there, is there any particular reason why the port hasn't been updated to 2.0.61 yet? http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.0.html Thanks, Stefan -- Stefan Bethke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Fon +49 170 346 0140 ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.

Re: Bad line in Makefile for /usr/ports/audio/mbrolavox

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using the PORTS supplied with PCBSD 1.4RC on CD2 . I have updated my PORTS recently. I do not know where this sytem gets the PORTS from but anyway .. There is a bug in this Makefile ( /usr/ports/audio/mbrolavox/Mak

Bad line in Makefile for /usr/ports/audio/mbrolavox

Dear [EMAIL PROTECTED] I am using the PORTS supplied with PCBSD 1.4RC on CD2 . I have updated my PORTS recently. I do not know where this sytem gets the PORTS from but anyway .. There is a bug in this Makefile ( /usr/ports/audio/mbrolavox/Makefile ) which will show up i