I'm actually doing a slight superset by looking at dependent ports
of (ignore/broken/forbidden/failed) ports, now that I have updated the
graph and can "see" it better.
It sounds like people are already working on the misc/compat3x dependents.
Most of these ports are antiques.
IMHO sysutils/eject
Bill Moran wrote:
> "Zane C.B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Summited http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=113611 over a
>> month ago, Araujo took responsibility, and has been no sign from him
>> that this is ever going to get committed.
>
> Posting to this list would be a good step. Howev
On Sun, 2007-07-22 at 08:58 +0800, Xin LI wrote:
> Tom McLaughlin wrote:
> > On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 03:07 -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> >> Hi
> >>
> >> Is a port of eclipse 3.3.0 likely soon?
> >>
> >> Thanks
> >>
> >> david
> >
> > [EMAIL PROTECTED], now CC'ed, may be a better place to ask
> > t
Hi,
to be able to make mplayer pkg-add'able and to introduce proper
dependencies on the mencoder binary for several frontents, the next
major update to our mplayer port will introduce an mencoder slave
port.
Hence, mencoder can also be built with different OPTIONS than mplayer.
A preliminary vers
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Saturday, July 21, 2007 22:58:40 -0500 Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> Including GPG?
Yes, been using Mulberry for months now *because* of the GPG support, actually
... it was what finally get me off of Pine ... but, again, only
--On July 21, 2007 9:10:27 PM -0300 "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Which list? :( I'm on mulberry-discuss ...
Oh, sorry. The mulberry-devel list.
Hopefully now that he's puttin gout the source code, we can get a
"FreeBSD Native" version in ports ... :)
Hopefully.
The fu
"Zane C.B." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Summited http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=113611 over a
> month ago, Araujo took responsibility, and has been no sign from him
> that this is ever going to get committed.
Posting to this list would be a good step. However, the
subject title cou
Tom McLaughlin wrote:
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 03:07 -0700, David Southwell wrote:
Hi
Is a port of eclipse 3.3.0 likely soon?
Thanks
david
[EMAIL PROTECTED], now CC'ed, may be a better place to ask
though I don't see anything in their archives about it.
On a side note, are any committers asso
Marc Evans wrote:
Hi -
I am wondering if you plan to update the gwenhywfar and aqbanking ports,
both of which have much more recent versions?
I think these ports are unmaintained. We would love to see someone to
take it over (hint :)
Cheers,
___
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
- --On Saturday, July 21, 2007 17:13:51 -0500 Paul Schmehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> --On July 21, 2007 6:53:23 PM -0300 "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>>
>> Running latest -STABLE of FreeBSD on an 64bit Dual Core, mulberry ma
I have recently installed and am trying to implement dkim-milter-1.2.0 and
have found what I believe to be a bug.
The file /usr/ports/mail/dkim-milter/work/dkim-milter-1.2.0/INSTALL (line
60) states:
the TXT record should be:
SELECTOR._domainkey.example.com
however running the script
/usr
Virtual category "geography" was created some time ago. Is anybody
willing to scan the tree and add some ports to that category?
--
Pav Lucistnik <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Just because you're an angel doesn't mean you have to be a fool.
signature.asc
Description: To
Greg Lewis píše v pá 20. 07. 2007 v 23:30 -0600:
> > The misc/compat3x port is unlikely to ever be fixed and therefore it would
> > seem reasonable to deprecate both it and the following ports that depend
> > on it:
> > java/gj-jdk11Extension of the Java programming language that
> >
--On July 21, 2007 6:53:23 PM -0300 "Marc G. Fournier" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Running latest -STABLE of FreeBSD on an 64bit Dual Core, mulberry mail
seems to run okay until such a point in time as I try to PGP
Sign/Encrypt an email and send it out, then it 'Seg Faults' ...
gpg appears to
Running latest -STABLE of FreeBSD on an 64bit Dual Core, mulberry mail seems to
run okay until such a point in time as I try to PGP Sign/Encrypt an email and
send it out, then it 'Seg Faults' ...
gpg appears to run fine from the command line, using gpg --list-keys ...
Anyone running Mulberry
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 21:27:52 +0100
"Edd Barrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sounds like you are planning on making a far more "fine grained" port
> than I have. Be warned it is a massive port that will drive you insane
> if you get too involved. I have my port in only 4 modules. Read the
> PDF I
(Hmmm, claws-mail somehow removed hrs@ from CC; I'm re-adding him.)
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 21:27:52 +0100
"Edd Barrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi Nikola,
>
> On 21/07/07, Nikola Lecic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Yes, I saw this on texlive mailing list, excellent job!
>
> Thankyou.
>
> >
Hi -
I am wondering if you plan to update the gwenhywfar and aqbanking ports,
both of which have much more recent versions?
- Marc
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send
Hi Nikola,
On 21/07/07, Nikola Lecic <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yes, I saw this on texlive mailing list, excellent job!
Thankyou.
I'd like to ask
Hiroki Sato, you and everyone interested/involved in this (and I'm not
fluent in OpenBSD ports interface...) for their opinion regarding to
what e
Hello Edd,
On Sat, 21 Jul 2007 20:07:46 +0100
"Edd Barrett" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Firstly I would like to apologise for the cross-post. I wouldn't
> usually do this, but as the message for both lists is identical, It
> would have looked like a cross post (even if it wasn't)...
O
Hi,
Firstly I would like to apologise for the cross-post. I wouldn't
usually do this, but as the message for both lists is identical, It
would have looked like a cross post (even if it wasn't)...
I have just finished porting TeXLive (A modern TeX distribution to
replace the old teTeX port) to O
Earlier this week, I was not yet ready to commit to
the emacs upgrade, but i wanted to upgrade my other
ports. So i added EMACS_PORT_NAME=emacs21 to make.conf
and did 'portupgrade -f -o editors/emacs21 emacs',
followed by my usual 'portupgrade -a'.
Now I'm ready to upgrade to emacs 22. What's the
On Saturday 21 July 2007 10:45:56 Tom McLaughlin wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 03:07 -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> > Hi
> >
> > Is a port of eclipse 3.3.0 likely soon?
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > david
>
> [EMAIL PROTECTED], now CC'ed, may be a better place to ask
> though I don't see anything in the
I assume that you've already emailed the person? If so, sending email
to portmgr@ is the right way to go. We'll attempt to find out if the
person is busy/on vacation/overloaded/etc.
mcl
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.or
On Sun, Jul 22, 2007 at 01:34:08AM +0800, Rong-En Fan wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 05:31:49PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> > ** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous
> > one **
> >
> > For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance
Quoting [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Thomas-Martin Seck) (Fri, 20 Jul 2007 19:54:06 +0200
(CEST)):
> * Alexander Leidinger <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [gmane.os.freebsd.devel.ports]:
>
> > Quoting Robert Noland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Thu, 19 Jul 2007 13:31:42 -0400):
> >
> >> Ok, so the issue that I hope to addres
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 03:07 -0700, David Southwell wrote:
> Hi
>
> Is a port of eclipse 3.3.0 likely soon?
>
> Thanks
>
> david
[EMAIL PROTECTED], now CC'ed, may be a better place to ask
though I don't see anything in their archives about it.
On a side note, are any committers associated with
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 05:31:49PM +, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> ** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous one
> **
>
> For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance that
> version numbers of a port form a monotonic increasing sequence
** The following ports have a version number that sorts before a previous one **
For many package tools to work correctly, it is of utmost importance that
version numbers of a port form a monotonic increasing sequence over time.
Refer to the FreeBSD Porter's Handbook, 'Package Naming Convention
On Sat, 2007-07-21 at 16:39 +0600, yarodin wrote:
> Jul 21 15:12:01 home sudo:admin : TTY=unknown ; PWD=/home/admin ;
> USER=root ; COMMAND=/sbin/ipfw
> Jul 21 15:12:36 home kernel: pid 42226 (sudo), uid 0: exited on signal 11
I need a little more information.
sudoers:
tom LOCAL
Summited http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=113611 over a
month ago, Araujo took responsibility, and has been no sign from him
that this is ever going to get committed.
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/li
G'day Peter,
Thanks for summarising this. Responses for some specific ports below.
On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 10:52:52AM +1000, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> The misc/compat3x port is unlikely to ever be fixed and therefore it would
> seem reasonable to deprecate both it and the following ports that depend
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Doug Barton wrote:
> Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
>> Again, the idea here was not to change anything in the ports
>> themselves: just what was presented in the INDEX,
>
> Ok, then I think it's incumbent on you to explain what the benefit
> would be.
Kent Stewart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Friday 20 July 2007, Mark Linimon wrote:
> > On Fri, Jul 20, 2007 at 04:07:49PM -0400, Bill Moran wrote:
> > > Even better would be for make to realize that it's only doing the
> > > fetching, and do it anyway.
> >
> > That still doesn't help with the
Jul 21 15:12:01 home sudo: admin : TTY=unknown ; PWD=/home/admin ;
USER=root ; COMMAND=/sbin/ipfw
Jul 21 15:12:36 home kernel: pid 42226 (sudo), uid 0: exited on signal 11
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
Doug Barton wrote:
> > and then mainly as a resource to make easier the lives of the
> > people that write ports management software.
>
> Well, I'm one of those people, and portmaster ignores the index file
> altogether, for whatever that's worth.
Me too for pkgupgrade. In my case the rationale
Hi
Is a port of eclipse 3.3.0 likely soon?
Thanks
david
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Matthew Seaman wrote:
> Again, the idea here was not to change anything in the ports
> themselves: just what was presented in the INDEX,
Ok, then I think it's incumbent on you to explain what the benefit
would be.
> and then mainly as a resource to make easier the lives of the
> people that wri
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
Doug Barton wrote:
> Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
>> In many ways it would be more useful to delete from the
>> EXTRACT_DEPENDS, FETCH_DEPENDS, PATCH_DEPENDS, BUILD_DEPENDS[*]
>> lists in the INDEX any package that also appears in the RUN_DEPENDS
>> list
39 matches
Mail list logo
