On Sat, 07 Jul 2007 09:57:59 -0700
Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Personally I think that portmaster's approach is the right one. If you
> accidentally delete something that it turns out you really do need,
> you can always install it again. [...]
I think that the point of this thread w
Michel Talon wrote:
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 09:57:59AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
The only reliable way to detect ports which have been installed as
a dependency is to create a database
*shudder* You just tripped over your own argument here. There are
plenty of ways that we could recog
Bill Milford a écrit :
I am running a server without X11. I use ImageMagick-nox11-6.3.3.5_1 and
GraphicsMagick-nox11-1.1.7_1 on
this server. The line "USE_GL= glut" was added to the Makefile on the last
update. This port now
requires X11. Why was this done? It compiles and installs OK with
On Sat, Jul 07, 2007 at 09:57:59AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>
> > The only reliable way to detect ports which have been installed as
> > a dependency is to create a database
>
> *shudder* You just tripped over your own argument here. There are
> plenty of ways that we could recognize a port that
I am running a server without X11. I use ImageMagick-nox11-6.3.3.5_1 and
GraphicsMagick-nox11-1.1.7_1 on
this server. The line "USE_GL= glut" was added to the Makefile on the last
update. This port now
requires X11. Why was this done? It compiles and installs OK without that
line. It seems
G. Paul Ziemba writes:
>[I wonder if there are more than three users of the nn port...]
I use nn on FreeBSD, but I haven't used the ports version in
some time, because I've hacked the version I use too heavily to
use the ports version as a starting point.
But I appreciate your efforts nonetheles
Michel Talon wrote:
> Doug Barton said:
>
>> Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Is there a way to track dependency-only ports, so that if I
>>> install port0 which requires port1 which in turn requires port2
>>> and so on, deinstalling port0 will deinstall portN up to the
>>> first one require
David Southwell wrote:
I posted this to the gimp mailing list but the list seems to have a v. low
activity and few postings. There is no reply so far. So hopefully there is
someone here who can point me in the right direction.
This type of question rather belongs to [EMAIL PROTECTED] I've CC'd
Doug Barton said:
> Jeremie Le Hen wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Is there a way to track dependency-only ports, so that if I install
> > port0 which requires port1 which in turn requires port2 and so on,
> > deinstalling port0 will deinstall portN up to the first one required
> > by
> > another port or
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>On 07/05/07 22:31, Eric Anderson wrote:
>> On 07/02/07 15:30, Juergen Lock wrote:
>>> Looks like its time for this again... Many bugs have been fixed,
>>> some features have been added, like, qemu-system-arm has grown
>>> emulation of a few PDAs like some
In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write:
>0n Thu, Jul 05, 2007 at 10:31:29PM -0500, Eric Anderson wrote:
>
>>On 07/02/07 15:30, Juergen Lock wrote:
>>> Looks like its time for this again... Many bugs have been fixed,
>>> some features have been added, like, qemu-system-arm has grown
>>>
Hi
I posted this to the gimp mailing list but the list seems to have a v. low
activity and few postings. There is no reply so far. So hopefully there is
someone here who can point me in the right direction.
I have installed ports/gimpshop on Freebsd 6.1. I want to compare
its functionality wit
[I wonder if there are more than three users of the nn port...]
The nn-6.7.3 port generates broken From: headers because of
patch-an to nntp.c. I'm not certain, but I think it's because
some ifdefs in earlier versions of the base code were removed
before 6.7.3 was released, and the patch was no
13 matches
Mail list logo
