I finally finished the xorg upgrade on my CURRENT notebook. Please see this as
a success report, not an error report. I can provide more info/testing if
someone is interested in any errors I've encountered.
I think I've seen most of this already reported:
The build process went fine, except for
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (Mon, 14 May 2007 10:37:05
-0500):
> Alexander Leidinger wrote:
> > Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from
> > Mon, 14 May 2007 09:39:13 -0500):
> >
> >> Someone pointed out that what I was proposing in +DEPENDENCIES is
> >
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 05:36:26PM -0800, Beech Rintoul wrote:
Everything built with no errors. Tested, looks good with KDE (fonts look
better). One error, had to merge skype by hand.
Thanks, yeah I think skype (and probably skype-devel) needs a versi
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 05:36:26PM -0800, Beech Rintoul wrote:
> Everything built with no errors. Tested, looks good with KDE (fonts look
> better). One error, had to merge skype by hand.
Thanks, yeah I think skype (and probably skype-devel) needs a version
bump to move it out of /usr/X11R6.
Kri
Everything built with no errors. Tested, looks good with KDE (fonts look
better). One error, had to merge skype by hand.
Great work guys!
Beech
--
---
Beech Rintoul - Port Maintainer - [EMAIL PROTECTED]
/"\ AS
On Mon, 14 May 2007, Diego Depaoli wrote:
Hi all,
it could be unrelated to Xorg upgrade, but now root, only root, is
unable to switch from X to console.
Ctrl+Alt+Fn doesn't work neither after a 'startx' neither after a
[kdm|gmd|xdm].
Regular users instead can do it.
?
--
Diego Depaoli
Marcelo Araujo wrote:
> Hey folks!
>
> I investigated this problem.
> I'm not sure about this!
> But, you must OPEN the PRs, for I will check it.
> You has to use for doing this, the tools, GNATS-WEB,
> ports-mgmt/porttools or sysutils/gtk-send-pr.
>
> Best Regards.
>
The PR is there. Please ha
Hi all,
it could be unrelated to Xorg upgrade, but now root, only root, is
unable to switch from X to console.
Ctrl+Alt+Fn doesn't work neither after a 'startx' neither after a [kdm|gmd|xdm].
Regular users instead can do it.
?
--
Diego Depaoli
_
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Dear porters,
>
> We are now ready for xorg 7.2 testing! Over the past week we have
> done extensive tests of various upgrade scenarios, fixed many
> remaining bugs, and now the upgrade is looking good. Of course, we
> can't possibly test everything, so that's where you com
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 01:19:40PM +0100, Tim Bishop wrote:
> On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 12:56:54PM +0100, Florent Thoumie wrote:
> > Tim Bishop wrote:
> > > On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > >> Once we have enough success reports and have dealt with all reported
> > >
I have created a new port for coldfusion 7.0.2
http://cupid.ubixos.com/coldfusion7.tgz
I have tested it on a few machine and it works... Any questions please
let me know..
Looking forward to hearing from someone soon..
-Christopher
Christopher Olsen
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
88B Toledo Street
Fa
On 5/14/07, Ed Lucero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I was interested in finding out when dspam 3.8.0 Stable will be
> > ported.
>
> It's in -devel, I'll will MFD it after the Ports freeze is over.
>
When is the ports freeze over?
The ports freeze will be over after xorg 7.2 gets imported into
Alexander Leidinger wrote:
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from
Mon, 14 May 2007 09:39:13 -0500):
Someone pointed out that what I was proposing in +DEPENDENCIES is
Probably me...
Yes
already to be found in +CONTENTS. So here is a proof of concept patch
to /usr/port
Quoting Stephen Montgomery-Smith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> (from
Mon, 14 May 2007 09:39:13 -0500):
Someone pointed out that what I was proposing in +DEPENDENCIES is
Probably me...
already to be found in +CONTENTS. So here is a proof of concept patch
to /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk (proof of concep
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Basically I think we are stuck on making "make package-depends" go any
faster.
However I do think that the modifications I made to pkg_create go a
very
significant way to solving the problem of registration t
On 5/14/07, Brian E. Conklin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
There seems to be a problem with rrdtool 1.2.23 when compiling on various
versions of FreeBSD if ruby 1.8 is installed. There has been a bit of chatter
in newsgroups about this. I am including the tail of the output from one of
my servers ma
There seems to be a problem with rrdtool 1.2.23 when compiling on various
versions of FreeBSD if ruby 1.8 is installed. There has been a bit of chatter
in newsgroups about this. I am including the tail of the output from one of
my servers making the attempt to compile hoping it will help find the
s
> -Original Message-
> From: Ion-Mihai Tetcu [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, May 12, 2007 12:32 PM
> To: Ed Lucero
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Shawn O'Connor
> Subject: Re: FreeBSD Port: dspam-3.6.8_2
>
> On Fri, 11 May 2007 09:47:49 -0700
> "Ed Lucero" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Basically I think we are stuck on making "make package-depends" go any
faster.
However I do think that the modifications I made to pkg_create go a very
significant way to solving the problem of registration taking so very long.
Stephen
Yo
Tim Bishop <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The default sshd_config in the base system no longer works with
> xforwarding because the xauth program has moved. This can be fixed by
> setting the option:
>
> XAuthLocation /usr/local/bin/xauth
>
> It defaults to X11R6.
>
> I guess this should be fixed af
On 13/05/2007, at 5:26 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 05:20:53PM +1000, Sam Lawrance wrote:
On 13/05/2007, at 5:13 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 05:04:29PM +1000, Sam Lawrance wrote:
On 12/05/2007, at 11:12 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 20
On Mon, May 14, 2007 at 12:56:54PM +0100, Florent Thoumie wrote:
> Tim Bishop wrote:
> > On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >> Once we have enough success reports and have dealt with all reported
> >> failures, we will proceed with the next stage, which is to import in
Tim Bishop wrote:
> On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>> Once we have enough success reports and have dealt with all reported
>> failures, we will proceed with the next stage, which is to import into
>> CVS.
>
> The default sshd_config in the base system no longer work
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Once we have enough success reports and have dealt with all reported
> failures, we will proceed with the next stage, which is to import into
> CVS.
The default sshd_config in the base system no longer works with
xforwarding because
Current FreeBSD problem reports
The following is a listing of current problems submitted by FreeBSD users.
These represent problem reports covering all versions including experimental
development code and obsolete releases.
Bugs can be in one of several states:
o - open
A problem report has bee
On Monday 14 of May 2007, Peter Jeremy wrote:
> Some good news and some bad news:
>
> Good news:
>
> Upgrade seems OK on my 6.2-STABLE/amd64 system butI needed multiple
> "portupgrade -a" iterations before it upgraded everything. I think
> this is a side-effect of using ports-mgmt/portupgrade rath
After making sure that all the packages/ports that Scilab depends upon
had been installed, including the ATLAS library (always a pain in the neck
to get built), I tried to build scilab. Very early, it fails in a perl
script I didn't even know was on the system, called autom4ke259 and kept in
Dear porters,
This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of
unbuildable ports at http://pointyhat.freebsd.org/errorlogs/ .
A list by MAINTAINER is
http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/errorlogs/
so you can easily check the status of ports that you maintain. In
addition, the li
Thomas Sparrevohn wrote:
>> If you follow the thread, there's already some success in reducing the
>> time
>> required to register ports with many dependencies. On my system
>> registering
>> x11/xorg now takes between 2 to 3 minutes instead of 10, with all the
>> changes.
>> I consider that a rema
> If you follow the thread, there's already some success in reducing the
> time
> required to register ports with many dependencies. On my system
> registering
> x11/xorg now takes between 2 to 3 minutes instead of 10, with all the
> changes.
> I consider that a remarkable improvement.
Absolutely
30 matches
Mail list logo
