Some good news and some bad news:
Good news:
Upgrade seems OK on my 6.2-STABLE/amd64 system butI needed multiple
"portupgrade -a" iterations before it upgraded everything. I think
this is a side-effect of using ports-mgmt/portupgrade rather than
ports-mgmt/portupgrade-devel.
Note that you _must
I appear to be stuck with blindness, I don't find where to submit patches for
the new ports-tree.
There are actually 2 mistakes in the port:
-DWITH_NVIDIA_GL=0
triggers
#ifdef WITH_NVIDIA_GL
and the patchfile that introduces the NVIDIA preprocessor macro contains #elif
where it should be #else.
d
On Sunday, 13 May 2007 at 22:42:17 -0500, Lane wrote:
> I just upgraded to FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE, after running 5.3 for years.
>
> My primary reason for upgrading was to take advantage of new features in xine
> and mplayer, and to get flash functionality out
> of /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplugin?
>
Garrett Cooper wrote:
> [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
>> With Xorg updated to 7.2 many ports take much longer to register than
>> to download, build and install.
>> I think it's time to abandon the recursive pulling in of dependencies.
>
> I think that you're missing the point of modular X; it was designed
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> Basically I think we are stuck on making "make package-depends" go any
> faster.
>
> However I do think that the modifications I made to pkg_create go a very
> significant way to solving the problem of registration taking so very long.
>
> Stephen
>
You are rig
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
With Xorg updated to 7.2 many ports take much longer to register than to
download, build and install.
> I think it's time to abandon the recursive pulling in of dependencies.
I think that you're missing the point of modular X; it was designed so
that things could be plugg
I just upgraded to FreeBSD 6.2-STABLE, after running 5.3 for years.
My primary reason for upgrading was to take advantage of new features in xine
and mplayer, and to get flash functionality out
of /usr/ports/www/linux-flashplugin?
Maybe I shoulda waited?
Now I get "Segmentation fault (core dum
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
I have looked into making the registration and package-building process
even faster. It seems to me that the easiest way would be to redesign
the package database so that it also includes a
package-name/+DEPENDENCIES file, which would be a kind of reverse of
pa
On Mon, 2007-05-14 at 01:34 +0100, Tim Bishop wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 07:05:05PM -0400, Howard Goldstein wrote:
> > Tim Bishop wrote:
> > > The problem is identical with all three. I have openldap installed:
> > >
> > > openldap-client-2.3.35
> > >
> > > And it's the owner of /usr/local/in
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 07:05:05PM -0400, Howard Goldstein wrote:
> Tim Bishop wrote:
> > The problem is identical with all three. I have openldap installed:
> >
> > openldap-client-2.3.35
> >
> > And it's the owner of /usr/local/include/lber.h.
> >
> > I can't see why this problem has emerged now
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 07:49:58PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> See other emails.
Ah, there it is. I read through the thread before posting to check
if it had been reported already but must have missed that one...
Sorry for the dupe.
Craig
___
freebs
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 06:31:34PM -0500, Craig Boston wrote:
> I decided to try this, but to do things a little differently. Before
> I get yelled at for not following instructions, please glance at what I
> did because I think it's a valid test:
>
> 1. Extract xorg7.2 test ports tree from Kris'
I decided to try this, but to do things a little differently. Before
I get yelled at for not following instructions, please glance at what I
did because I think it's a valid test:
1. Extract xorg7.2 test ports tree from Kris's .tbz
2. pkg_delete -a
3. rm -rf /usr/X11R6
4. Clean everything out of
Tim Bishop wrote:
> The problem is identical with all three. I have openldap installed:
>
> openldap-client-2.3.35
>
> And it's the owner of /usr/local/include/lber.h.
>
> I can't see why this problem has emerged now - these apps were already
> sharing /usr/local. Maybe it's unrelated to the xorg
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Once we have enough success reports and have dealt with all reported
> failures, we will proceed with the next stage, which is to import into
> CVS.
Finished, at last :-)
The first problem I had was the documented (and fixed) proble
Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v ne 13. 05. 2007 v 17:53 -0500:
> Pav Lucistnik wrote:
> > Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v ne 13. 05. 2007 v 17:32 -0500:
> >
> >> I have looked into making the registration and package-building process
> >> even faster. It seems to me that the easiest way would be
Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v ne 13. 05. 2007 v 17:32 -0500:
I have looked into making the registration and package-building process
even faster. It seems to me that the easiest way would be to redesign
the package database so that it also includes a
package-name/+DEPE
Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v ne 13. 05. 2007 v 17:32 -0500:
> I have looked into making the registration and package-building process
> even faster. It seems to me that the easiest way would be to redesign
> the package database so that it also includes a
> package-name/+DEPENDENCIES file,
I have looked into making the registration and package-building process
even faster. It seems to me that the easiest way would be to redesign
the package database so that it also includes a
package-name/+DEPENDENCIES file, which would be a kind of reverse of
package-name/+REQUIRED_BY. This co
On Sunday 13 May 2007 23:59:15 you wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 11:53:11PM +0200, Danny Pansters wrote:
> > On Saturday 12 May 2007 05:38:28 you wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 04:37:17AM +0200, Danny Pansters wrote:
> > > > On Saturday 12 May 2007 03:12:49 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > > O
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 11:53:11PM +0200, Danny Pansters wrote:
> On Saturday 12 May 2007 05:38:28 you wrote:
> > On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 04:37:17AM +0200, Danny Pansters wrote:
> > > On Saturday 12 May 2007 03:12:49 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > > On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 02:35:00AM +0200, Danny Panst
On Saturday 12 May 2007 05:38:28 you wrote:
> On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 04:37:17AM +0200, Danny Pansters wrote:
> > On Saturday 12 May 2007 03:12:49 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> > > On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 02:35:00AM +0200, Danny Pansters wrote:
> > > > I ran into a little problem with the gstreamer-plugin
> We're asking all FreeBSD ports committers and other interested
> developers to participate in this process: it's now up to you guys to
> test the upgrade and report problems you encounter, before we unleash
> it on the general user base.
Just finished updating of my DesktopBSD 1.6 RC2 installati
I did a new minimal FreeBSD 6.2 install on a Thinkpad x40 and then
installed Xorg 7.2, basically following the upgrade instructions -- I
built libXft first, then xorg using "make install clean" in both cases.
Ran the mergebase.sh script without issue (didn't expect any since this
had been a new cl
Le Dim 13 mai 07 à 22:43:23 +0200, Florent Thoumie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
écrivait :
> Any reason why PORTREVISION is part of DIST_SUBDIR? Cause it caused a
> few breakages for no apparent real benefit. Using PKGNAME to define
> DISTNAME or DISTFILES is also a bad thing IMO.
Yes, I did that to chas
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> Kris Kennaway wrote:
>> On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 08:05:18AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
>>> David Thiel wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 01:42:23AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> After the upgrade I don't have glxgears or glxinfo on my system. Could
> anyone
>
Thierry Thomas wrote:
> Le Dim 13 mai 07 à 18:29:17 +0200, Thierry Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> écrivait :
>
>> graphics/cimg is broken: this port suffers of frequent silent updates,
>> and PORTVERSION is included in its DISTDIR, then distinfo must be
>> updated when PORTVERSION is bumped.
>
> S
On 5/13/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 01:11:15AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> On 5/13/07, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 01:00:51AM +0400, Andrew Pantyukhin wrote:
> >> mergebase.sh failed, probably because my system
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 08:32:55PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
> This doesn't look right to me:
>
> /usr/ports/x11-fonts/libXfont is still in the ports tree, but
> disconnected from the INDEX. It appears to have been left behind
> after the port was repocopied to /usr/ports/x11/libXfonts. Ap
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 08:05:18AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
>> David Thiel wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 01:42:23AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
After the upgrade I don't have glxgears or glxinfo on my system. Could
anyone
tell me which port they belong
On Sun, 13 May 2007, P.U.Kruppa wrote:
On Sun, 13 May 2007, Diego Depaoli wrote:
Hi all,
after a big rebuild, everything works fine on my -current.
I got only a failure on qt4-gui which doesn't seem related to this update.
However there is the log.
Good job, many thanks.
Diego Depaoli
I'd l
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 03:14:50PM +0400, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello Kris,
>
> Saturday, May 12, 2007, 9:40:11 PM, you wrote:
>
> KK> I think that before you abandon something you should first understand
> KK> it.
> Can you explain, why we need to register "A depends on C / C required by A"
Le Dim 13 mai 07 à 18:29:17 +0200, Thierry Thomas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
écrivait :
> graphics/cimg is broken: this port suffers of frequent silent updates,
> and PORTVERSION is included in its DISTDIR, then distinfo must be
> updated when PORTVERSION is bumped.
Same kind of problem with devel/boum
On Friday 11 May 2007 00:28:17 Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Dear porters,
>
> We are now ready for xorg 7.2 testing! Over the past week we have
> done extensive tests of various upgrade scenarios, fixed many
> remaining bugs, and now the upgrade is looking good. Of course, we
> can't possibly test ever
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA256
This doesn't look right to me:
/usr/ports/x11-fonts/libXfont is still in the ports tree, but
disconnected from the INDEX. It appears to have been left behind
after the port was repocopied to /usr/ports/x11/libXfonts. Apart
from $FreeBSD$ tags, th
Le Jeu 10 mai 07 à 23:28:17 +0200, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
écrivait :
> We're asking all FreeBSD ports committers and other interested
> developers to participate in this process: it's now up to you guys to
> test the upgrade and report problems you encounter, before we unleash
> it on
Le Jeu 10 mai 07 à 23:28:17 +0200, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
écrivait :
> We're asking all FreeBSD ports committers and other interested
> developers to participate in this process: it's now up to you guys to
> test the upgrade and report problems you encounter, before we unleash
> it on
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> Once we have enough success reports and have dealt with all reported
> failures, we will proceed with the next stage, which is to import into
> CVS.
I finally finished last night. The only bumps that I had were duplicates
in /usr/loc
Hello,
I just wanted to inform you what problems I got installing latest relese
of firebird on my FreeBSD 6.2
I use Firebird as a backend DB for a PHP 5.2.2 webapplication.
1. First I installed the latest firebird-server-2.0.1.tbz production
release from freeBSD ports server with pkg_add. E
Le Jeu 10 mai 07 à 23:28:17 +0200, Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
écrivait :
> We're asking all FreeBSD ports committers and other interested
> developers to participate in this process: it's now up to you guys to
> test the upgrade and report problems you encounter, before we unleash
> it on
On Sun, 13 May 2007, Pav Lucistnik wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith p??e v ne 13. 05. 2007 v 00:02 -0500:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
OK chaps, this is what I came up with. So for example, if I do "make
install" on /usr/ports/x11/xorg (having made all the
Hi all,
after a big rebuild, everything works fine on my -current.
I got only a failure on qt4-gui which doesn't seem related to this update.
However there is the log.
Good job, many thanks.
Diego Depaoli
===> Configuring for qt4-gui-4.2.3_2
/bin/cp /usr/ports/x11-toolkits/qt4-gui/../../devel/
On Thursday 10 May 2007, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> We're asking all FreeBSD ports committers and other interested
> developers to participate in this process: it's now up to you guys to
> test the upgrade and report problems you encounter, before we unleash
> it on the general user base.
>
> Once we h
Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:44:19AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
OK chaps, this is what I came up with. So for example, if I do "make
install" on /usr/ports/x11/xorg (having made all the dependencies), on
my computer it t
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello [LoN]Kamikaze,
> Sunday, May 13, 2007, 3:53:29 PM, you wrote:
>
>
> LK> the decision has been made long ago
> I want to understand: WHY has such decision been made?
>
Then I suppose you should take a look at CVS and have a look way back in time
when ports were f
Stephen Montgomery-Smith píše v ne 13. 05. 2007 v 00:02 -0500:
> Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> > Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> >> OK chaps, this is what I came up with. So for example, if I do "make
> >> install" on /usr/ports/x11/xorg (having made all the dependencies), on
> >> my compu
Hello [LoN]Kamikaze,
Sunday, May 13, 2007, 3:53:29 PM, you wrote:
LK> the decision has been made long ago
I want to understand: WHY has such decision been made?
--
Best regards,
Levmailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-
Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> Hello Kris,
>
> Saturday, May 12, 2007, 9:40:11 PM, you wrote:
>
> KK> I think that before you abandon something you should first understand
> KK> it.
> Can you explain, why we need to register "A depends on C / C required by A"
> in A -> B -> C chain?
> I can not se
Hello Kris,
Saturday, May 12, 2007, 9:40:11 PM, you wrote:
KK> I think that before you abandon something you should first understand
KK> it.
Can you explain, why we need to register "A depends on C / C required by A"
in A -> B -> C chain?
I can not see any advantages, only disadvantages:
(
Kris Kennaway wrote:
> On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:44:19AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
>> [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
>>> Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
OK chaps, this is what I came up with. So for example, if I do "make
install" on /usr/ports/x11/xorg (having made all the dependencies), on
>>
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 10:44:19AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> > Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
> >> OK chaps, this is what I came up with. So for example, if I do "make
> >> install" on /usr/ports/x11/xorg (having made all the dependencies), on
> >> my computer it turns
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> Stephen Montgomery-Smith wrote:
>> OK chaps, this is what I came up with. So for example, if I do "make
>> install" on /usr/ports/x11/xorg (having made all the dependencies), on
>> my computer it turns the pkg_create from taking about 4 minutes to the
>> blink of an eye. No
Sampson Stein wrote:
> +++ [LoN]Kamikaze [freebsd] [13/05/07 08:05 +0200]:
>> David Thiel wrote:
>>> On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 01:42:23AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
After the upgrade I don't have glxgears or glxinfo on my system.
Could anyone
tell me which port they belong to?
>>>
>>>
On 13/05/2007, at 5:26 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 05:20:53PM +1000, Sam Lawrance wrote:
On 13/05/2007, at 5:13 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 05:04:29PM +1000, Sam Lawrance wrote:
On 12/05/2007, at 11:12 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 20
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 05:20:53PM +1000, Sam Lawrance wrote:
>
> On 13/05/2007, at 5:13 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> >On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 05:04:29PM +1000, Sam Lawrance wrote:
> >>
> >>On 12/05/2007, at 11:12 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
> >>
> >>>On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 02:35:00AM +0200, Danny
On 13/05/2007, at 5:13 PM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 05:04:29PM +1000, Sam Lawrance wrote:
On 12/05/2007, at 11:12 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 02:35:00AM +0200, Danny Pansters wrote:
I ran into a little problem with the gstreamer-plugins, to be
exac
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 05:04:29PM +1000, Sam Lawrance wrote:
>
> On 12/05/2007, at 11:12 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
>
> >On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 02:35:00AM +0200, Danny Pansters wrote:
> >
> >>I ran into a little problem with the gstreamer-plugins, to be
> >>exact with
> >>the 'bad' plugin. What
On 12/05/2007, at 12:22 PM, David Thiel wrote:
On Thu, May 10, 2007 at 05:28:17PM -0400, Kris Kennaway wrote:
Once we have enough success reports and have dealt with all reported
failures, we will proceed with the next stage, which is to import
into
CVS.
One failure so far:
x11/nvidia-dr
On 12/05/2007, at 11:12 AM, Kris Kennaway wrote:
On Sat, May 12, 2007 at 02:35:00AM +0200, Danny Pansters wrote:
I ran into a little problem with the gstreamer-plugins, to be
exact with
the 'bad' plugin. What's in a name. Attached patch to gstreamer-
plugins which
eliminates X11BASE from c
On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 08:05:18AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> David Thiel wrote:
> > On Sun, May 13, 2007 at 01:42:23AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> >> After the upgrade I don't have glxgears or glxinfo on my system. Could
> >> anyone
> >> tell me which port they belong to?
> >
> > graphics/m
60 matches
Mail list logo
