Re: HEADSUP: removing the old cyrus-sasl port

On Friday, 30 March 2007 at 19:05:17 +0200, Gabor Kovesdan wrote: > Dear Port Maintainers, > > I would like to inform you that the security/cyrus-sasl port is > deprecated and expired. It is pretty old and not really supported any > more. ... > > Could you please modify your ports to use cyrus-sasl

Re: ports installation location

On 3/30/07, Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > make PKGNAMESUFFIX=_vh1 PREFIX=/usr2/virtualhosts > > JOOMLA_DIR=virtualhostname/joomla install > > > > Scot > Thank you Scot > That fixed that problem.. > and files were installed to the target directory for my > virual webs. BUUT > I get the s

Re: working version of acroread7 for FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE needed

On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 03:32:40PM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote: > On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:05:57 -0500 Rick Voland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > >Scott Bennett wrote: > >> I need a functioning version of acroread version 7 for my 6.1 system > >> "pkg_add -r acroread7" does not find a packag

Re: working version of acroread7 for FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE needed

On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 05:47:43PM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote: > On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:57:06 -0400 Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > wrote: > > >On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 01:52:49PM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote: > >> I need a functioning version of acroread version 7 for my 6.1 system > >

Re: working version of acroread7 for FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE needed

On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:57:06 -0400 Kris Kennaway <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 01:52:49PM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote: >> I need a functioning version of acroread version 7 for my 6.1 system >> "pkg_add -r acroread7" does not find a package. "portinstall acroread7"

Difference between pkg_create and make package

Hi, Is there any difference between pkg_create -Rb or make package-recursive in the resulting package file? I tried a pkg_create -Rb and copied the files to another machine, and when i installed the package it worked, but the program didn't load properly (xorg + xfce4). It worked on the origi

Re: working version of acroread7 for FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE needed

On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:32:40 -0500 (CDT) Scott Bennett <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:05:57 -0500 Rick Voland > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >Scott Bennett wrote: > >> I need a functioning version of acroread version 7 for my 6.1 > >> system "pkg_add -r acroread7" do

Re: working version of acroread7 for FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE needed

On Fri, 30 Mar 2007 15:05:57 -0500 Rick Voland <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >Scott Bennett wrote: >> I need a functioning version of acroread version 7 for my 6.1 system >> "pkg_add -r acroread7" does not find a package. "portinstall acroread7" >> fails initially on an error return from a

Re: working version of acroread7 for FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE needed

On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 01:52:49PM -0500, Scott Bennett wrote: > I need a functioning version of acroread version 7 for my 6.1 system > "pkg_add -r acroread7" does not find a package. "portinstall acroread7" > fails initially on an error return from a brandelf command, as it should, > because

working version of acroread7 for FreeBSD 6.1-RELEASE needed

I need a functioning version of acroread version 7 for my 6.1 system "pkg_add -r acroread7" does not find a package. "portinstall acroread7" fails initially on an error return from a brandelf command, as it should, because the brandelf is being applied to a shell script rather than to an exec

Re: error installing xorg-libraries in /usr/local

On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 11:41:00AM +0200, Karol Kwiatkowski wrote: > Hello all, > > maybe it's a classic PBKAC but I can't figure it out. Anyone > successfully installed xorg-libraries with X11BASE=/usr/local? > > I get 'make: don't know how to make > /usr/local/include/X11/fonts/fontmisc.h' erro

Difference between pkg_create and make package

Hi, Is there any difference between pkg_create -Rb or make package-recursive in the resulting package file? I tried a pkg_create -Rb and copied the files to another machine, and when i installed the package it worked, but the program didn't load properly (xorg + xfce4). It worked on the origi

Re: ports installation location

PLEASE DISCARD LAST POSTING IT HAD WRONG ERROR REPORT - This is the correct one -- apologies > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vizion > Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 10:37 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Scot Hetzel > Subject: Re:

Re: ports installation location

> -Original Message- > From: Scot Hetzel [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 8:16 AM > To: Vizion > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: ports installation location > > On 3/30/07, Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > -Original Message- > > > From: [

HEADSUP: removing the old cyrus-sasl port

Dear Port Maintainers, I would like to inform you that the security/cyrus-sasl port is deprecated and expired. It is pretty old and not really supported any more. The only barrier to remove it is, that it has some dependant ports, currently the following ones: databases/cyrus-smlacapd japane

Re: Time to kill FreeBSD as a Desktop

On Thursday 29 March 2007 04:49 pm, Rico Secada wrote: > On Thu, 29 Mar 2007 15:45:30 -0800 > Thats typical Ubuntu. Those problems doesn't exist on Debian. And no > "unofficial" repos are needed on Debian. Not quite true. deb http://ftp.debian-unofficial.org/debian/ etch main contrib non-free re

Re: ports installation location

On 3/30/07, Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scot Hetzel > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 9:29 AM > To: Vizion > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: ports installation location >

Re: ports installation location

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Scot Hetzel > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 9:29 AM > To: Vizion > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]; [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: ports installation location > > On 3/29/07, Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote

What to do with Perl Modules moved to BackPAN?

Hi, list! I maintaining a port of a (very rarely used I guess) Perl Module, databases/p5-DMOZ-ParseRDF, which has been moved to BackPAN[1] - http://backpan.perl.org/authors/id/P/PA/PAUL/ works, but http://search.cpan.org/dist/DMOZ-ParseRDF gives no hits. In the Makefile I use MASTER_SITES= ${MA

Re: joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts

On Fri, Mar 30, 2007 at 04:33:24AM -0700, Vizion wrote: [...] > > You don't want to use DESTDIR for this either (again, unless > > I'm missing > > something). What you want to do is to do what an earlier > > post suggested > > and re-work the port such that you can install it with a given PREF

Re: joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Wesley Shields > Sent: Thursday, March 29, 2007 12:03 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Vizion > Subject: Re: joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts > > On Thu, Mar 29, 2007 at 02:36:53P

Ports - proposal - To handle Multiple instances

> Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 4:06 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: Lowell Gilbert; Wesley Shields > Subject: WAS ORIGINALLY RE: joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts > > > >> > .. much deleted > >> > > The past dialogue has encouraged me to an idea to discover > whether anyon

zope and py24-zopeInterface clash

Hi, Check this thread, it helped me after zope refused to start after a portupgrade -a So, it seems to me there's a bug in the ports tree, somehow? When installing plone, it installs zope29 and python24, and python

RE: joomla ports - installation- multiple virtual hosts

>> .. much deleted >> The past dialogue has encouraged me to an idea to discover whether anyone thinks its implementation could provide a generic solution for any port needing multiple installation instances. It may be there is another way of achieving the same goal but here is my two pennywor

error installing xorg-libraries in /usr/local

Hello all, maybe it's a classic PBKAC but I can't figure it out. Anyone successfully installed xorg-libraries with X11BASE=/usr/local? I get 'make: don't know how to make /usr/local/include/X11/fonts/fontmisc.h' error while installing. The command is 'portupgrade -fRp xorg-libraries'. I'm using g

xpi updates

Dear xpi-extensions maintainers, Some of you granted me an implicit approval for routine updates of your xpi ports. That was some time ago and now I ask you to renew the approval. If you want to, just reply to this mail (you don't need to include all the recipients, of course) to tell me it's oka