Re: cannot upgrade p5-Pod-Simple

in message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, wrote Lars Kristiansen thusly... > > I am having a problem upgrading p5-Pod-Simple. But i do not know > perl. Can one tell from this output if it is something wrong with > my installation or if it is something wrong with the port? I just tried the port installatio

Re: editor/openoffice.org-2-devel : broken links

I'm not sure about the first 2 urls, but the openoffice.lunarshells.com one just experienced hardware failure. I run that host and I'm in the process of getting it replaced asap. On 3/15/07, Garrett Cooper <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: The following 2 links are broken:

editor/openoffice.org-2-devel : broken links

The following 2 links are broken: Code: => OOo_SRC680_m204_source.tar.bz2 doesn

circular dependency

I am trying to get eclipse installed with both python and C language abilities installed, and I am using that nice tool, port-manager, to do it, but port-manager seems to be striking a bit of a problem with one of eclipse-cdt's dependencies, devel/gnome-vfs. The problem is, port-manager has decid

Re: enlightenment-devel does not compile

On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:06:01PM +0100, Karol Kwiatkowski wrote: > Yeah, I had this too. You'll need to recompile x11/ecore with dbus support. any reason I must compile ecore with dbus support? ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.f

Re: enlightenment-devel does not compile

Laganakos Vassilis wrote: Excelent! It compiles and works fine ( as always ;) ) with some nice nifty features! Thanx! Vassilis On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:06:01PM +0100, Karol Kwiatkowski wrote: Laganakos Vassilis wrote: Hi, I've got a problem compiling enlightenment-devel after the port's

Re: (no subject)

Robert Huff wrote: Vizion writes: I do not know about that.. If there is a refusal to keep the port in the tree then the folks at OpenOffice will HAVE to do something about it. They will? Why? While there's no reason to think they want to gratuitously create bad feelings,

Re: php4 port - undefined ref to getopt_long

> 3) today i stopped being able to build php4 -- i get the following > error > that stops the upgrade: > ext/standard/basic_functions.lo(.text+0x1507): undefined reference to > `getopt_long' If you still would like to build PHP on FreeBSD 4.11 you need to open /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.port.mk and retur

Re: enlightenment-devel does not compile

Excelent! It compiles and works fine ( as always ;) ) with some nice nifty features! Thanx! Vassilis On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 10:06:01PM +0100, Karol Kwiatkowski wrote: > Laganakos Vassilis wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I've got a problem compiling enlightenment-devel after the port's > > upgrade. I g

Re: enlightenment-devel does not compile

Laganakos Vassilis wrote: > Hi, > > I've got a problem compiling enlightenment-devel after the port's > upgrade. I get the following error: > > > ===> Building for enlightenment-20070223,1 > gmake all-recursive > gmake[1]: Entering directory > `/usr/ports/x11-wm/enlightenment-devel/work/e-200

cannot upgrade p5-Pod-Simple

Hello! I am having a problem upgrading p5-Pod-Simple. But i do not know perl. Can one tell from this output if it is something wrong with my installation or if it is something wrong with the port? Here is output: [EMAIL PROTECTED]/usr/ports/textproc/p5-Pod-Simple# make reinstall ===> Installin

enlightenment-devel does not compile

Hi, I've got a problem compiling enlightenment-devel after the port's upgrade. I get the following error: ===> Building for enlightenment-20070223,1 gmake all-recursive gmake[1]: Entering directory `/usr/ports/x11-wm/enlightenment-devel/work/e-20070223' Making all in src gmake[2]: Entering di

Re: SQUID PACKAGE

VAD wrote: Hello. Please add to ports the package of Squid - 2.6.10 Thank you/ its been there for a while now: cat /usr/ports/www/squid/distinfo MD5 (squid2.6/squid-2.6.STABLE10.tar.bz2) = 8a4b084a4ed345ef92fadf97d583cb10 SHA256 (squid2.6/squid-2.6.STABLE10.tar.bz2) = b87f203d0138999478fdbfc

Re: SQUID PACKAGE

On Thu, Mar 15, 2007 at 09:06:49PM +0500, VAD wrote: > Hello. > Please add to ports the package of Squid - 2.6.10 > Thank you/ OK, miwi travelled back in time by 8 days and did it especially for you! :) Kris pgp5Gvohw7gGk.pgp Description: PGP signature

SQUID PACKAGE

Hello. Please add to ports the package of Squid - 2.6.10 Thank you/ -- Best regards, VAD mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscrib

(no subject)

Vizion writes: > I do not know about that.. If there is a refusal to keep the port > in the tree then the folks at OpenOffice will HAVE to do > something about it. They will? Why? While there's no reason to think they want to gratuitously create bad feelings, FreeBSD machine

Mozilla -is this port ever going to be fixed?

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Vizion > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 8:31 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: (no subject) > > > > > -Original Message- > > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > [mail

(no subject)

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Huff > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 8:19 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Mozilla -is this port ever going to be fixed? > > Vizion writes: > > > > > _However_: at least one maj

Re: Mozilla -is this port ever going to be fixed?

Vizion writes: > >_However_: at least one major port - OpenOffice - depends on > > mozilla headers, at least in the usual fully-built-out > > configuration. Specificially, on mozilla-1.7.13* headers. And it's > > been stuck in this state for at least a year. (If this is wrong, > > and

Re: Mozilla -is this port ever going to be fixed?

> -Original Message- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Robert Huff > Sent: Thursday, March 15, 2007 6:21 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: Mozilla -is this port ever going to be fixed? > > > Michael Johnson writes: > > > > Can anyone tell me if

Re: Mozilla -is this port ever going to be fixed?

Michael Johnson writes: > > Can anyone tell me if the vulnerabities for mozilla-1.7.13_1.2 are due to > > be fixed in the near future? > > Maybe, I kinda doubt it though since mozilla turned in to > seamonkey. As far as I can tell, www/mozilla is not intended for use by humans. Re

pkgupgrade

Hello, this is to announce version 1.2 of pkgupgrade, a python tool aimed at upgrading freebsd ports installations mainly using binary packages. It has a companion program pkg_save.py by Cyrille Szymanski which performs backups prior to upgrades, which has been upgraded to version 0.7 and a small

Re: Mozilla -is this port ever going to be fixed?

On 3/15/07, Vizion <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Can anyone tell me if the vulnerabities for mozilla-1.7.13_1.2 are due to be fixed in the near future? Maybe, I kinda doubt it though since mozilla turned in to seamonkey. Michael If not should it not be dropped from the ports tree rather t

Mozilla -is this port ever going to be fixed?

Hi Can anyone tell me if the vulnerabities for mozilla-1.7.13_1.2 are due to be fixed in the near future? If not should it not be dropped from the ports tree rather than using up processing time only to generate build errors when running portupgrade -a? Thanks David _