Synopsis: [PATCH] finance/gnucash-devel: Add development release 1.9.0
Responsible-Changed-From-To: ports->freebsd-ports-bugs
Responsible-Changed-By: lawrance
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Feb 22 06:16:36 UTC 2007
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Reassign to the correct group
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/
Eric:
I too saw the same problem on both 6.2 and current. If one searches the
PR's one can find a reference to this problem.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/108776
Unfortunately, the PR is "closed" because it is "not reproducible". At
the bottom of the PR I found the following
Hello Eric,
On Wed, 21 Feb 2007, Eric Schuele wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Anyone seeing the following while building the latest wireshark?
Yep. See: http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=108892
Can't say much for the responses though :-/
Regards,
Stacey
> Previously had it installed, this was
On 2/21/07, Jason Gretz < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey guys, I got a prob here, I am trying to install the new NTFS-3G
driver, which just went 1.0, and This is what the output of "make install
&& make clean" got me:
===> Installing for fusefs-ntfs-0.20070207RC1
===> fusefs-ntfs-0.200702
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 10:31:04PM +0100, Helmut Schneider wrote:
> does anyone maintain that port? Or is there something adequate for Apache
> 2.0?
$ cd ports/www/mod_auth_kerb
$ make maintainer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
So, you should post this question to the [EMAIL PROTECTED]
mailing list.
mcl
Hey guys, I got a prob here, I am trying to install the new NTFS-3G driver,
which just went 1.0, and This is what the output of “make install && make
clean” got me:
===> Installing for fusefs-ntfs-0.20070207RC1
===> fusefs-ntfs-0.20070207RC1 depends on file: /usr/local/modules/fuse.ko -
- Original Message
From: "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
...and Freddie Cash
Thanks. This has led me to a few other questions:
* There are apparently a number of s/w packages the previous sysadmin built out
in this box. However, the version of Zope upon which we are dependent re
Hi,
does anyone maintain that port? Or is there something adequate for Apache
2.0?
Thanks, Helmut
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED
Andrey Chernov wrote:
> X server can't load any module (undefined symbols) because modules are not
> linked properly (due to objformat check). Does somebody work on this?
I just created a shell script named /usr/bin/objformat that spits
out "elf" when invoked. A step backwards but it works here
Hi,
I have compiled exim with WITH_SRS however I am not able to use any srs
commands.
2007-02-21 13:57:47 Exim configuration error in line 18 of
/usr/local/etc/exim/configure:
main option "srs_alwaysrewrite" unknown
I wanted to be sure that it was compiled in by uninstalling libsrs2 and
Hello,
Anyone seeing the following while building the latest wireshark?
Previously had it installed, this was just a portupgrade from:
wireshark-0.99.4_1 < needs updating (port has 0.99.5)
-Wl,/usr/local/lib -Wl,--rpath -Wl,/usr/X11R6/lib
epan/.libs/libwireshark.so: undefined refere
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 19:01, Andrey Chernov wrote:
> X server can't load any module (undefined symbols) because modules are not
> linked properly (due to objformat check). Does somebody work on this?
ports/109091 (imake.c patch) shoul fix that. I'll hopefully have time to test
and commit
X server can't load any module (undefined symbols) because modules are not
linked properly (due to objformat check). Does somebody work on this?
--
http://ache.pp.ru/
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/
> On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 01:48:44PM -0300, Phillip Neumann wrote:
>> El mi??, 21-02-2007 a las 17:28 +0200, Kostik Belousov escribi??:
>> > Could you, please, give me the full patch (against CVS Makefile) ?
>>
>>
>> Sure. sorry for not doing it ..
>>
>> thanks
>>
>
> Patch helped, thanks. I succes
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 01:48:44PM -0300, Phillip Neumann wrote:
> El mi??, 21-02-2007 a las 17:28 +0200, Kostik Belousov escribi??:
> > Could you, please, give me the full patch (against CVS Makefile) ?
>
>
> Sure. sorry for not doing it ..
>
> thanks
>
Patch helped, thanks. I successfully di
Drew Jenkins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi;
[...]
links are and build from ports...obviously my preference. However, I
can't figure out *where* the ports build! That is, in a standard
built-from-source python, one enters the dir, issues an "ls" and
sees dirs like "lib", "etc", etc. Where are
On Wednesday 21 February 2007 07:48 am, Drew Jenkins wrote:
> I'm rebuilding a server because of a hardware failure that has
> corrupted various s/w, including the OS. The server I'm rebuilding was
> built by someone else. That person spent a lot of time developing a
> certain s/w package that I ha
Hi;
I'm rebuilding a server because of a hardware failure that has corrupted
various s/w, including the OS. The server I'm rebuilding was built by someone
else. That person spent a lot of time developing a certain s/w package that I
haven't had time to study enough to claim any expertise. So, I
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 12:06:17PM -0300, Phillip Neumann wrote:
> Oh..
>
> and maybe this helps too
>
> MONO_GAC_PREFIX=false (in MAKE_ENV)
Could you, please, give me the full patch (against CVS Makefile) ?
Thanks.
pgpUQVp4GqH2b.pgp
Description: PGP signature
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 01:18:33PM +0100, Fabian Keil wrote:
> Is that an assumption or do you really know someone who
> first uses a free license and then objects to people
> distributing his program in compliance with that license?
We have, in the past, had to remove ports because the author obj
Synopsis: [NEW PORT] www/mnogosearch-php: Mnogosearch PHP frontend
Responsible-Changed-From-To: ports->freebsd-ports-bugs
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Feb 21 13:53:01 UTC 2007
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Canonicalize assignment.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.c
On Wed, Feb 21, 2007 at 12:25:06PM +0100, Atz-Soft wrote:
>
> The program has the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
> Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option)
> any later version.
> The program is not in the FreeBSD ports system but can be compile
"Atz-Soft" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I'd be interested in the policy about new ports in the following situation:
>
> The program has the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
> Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option)
> any later version.
> The pr
"Fabian Keil" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Is that an assumption or do you really know someone who
> first uses a free license and then objects to people
> distributing his program in compliance with that license?
Just an assumption. I didn't want to spend time and effort creating a port
and then
Atz-Soft wrote:
> Hello!
>
> I'd be interested in the policy about new ports in the following situation:
>
> The program has the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
> Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option)
> any later version.
> The program is no
Greetings,
Has anyone been able to get nntpcache working on AMD64 (6.2-RELEASE)
The same ports tree compiles on 6.2-RELEASE i386 and work 100%
Compiling on AMD64 results in :
connected to NNTP server vasbyt.local.net as DEFAULT
=> [vasbyt.local.net] list overview.fmt
refused list overview.fmt o
Hello!
I'd be interested in the policy about new ports in the following situation:
The program has the GNU General Public License as published by the Free
Software Foundation; either version 2 of the License, or (at your option)
any later version.
The program is not in the FreeBSD ports system bu
Synopsis: [PATCH] finance/gnucash-devel: Add development release 1.9.0
Responsible-Changed-From-To: lawrance->ports
Responsible-Changed-By: lawrance
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Feb 21 11:17:37 UTC 2007
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Back to pool. A lot of people are interested in an updated version
Synopsis: [NEW PORT] www/mnogosearch-php: Mnogosearch PHP frontend
Responsible-Changed-From-To: lawrance->ports
Responsible-Changed-By: lawrance
Responsible-Changed-When: Wed Feb 21 11:13:52 UTC 2007
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Release it; I was never sure about this one.
Maybe a mnogosearch/php use
Synopsis: arping has INconsistent versioning
State-Changed-From-To: feedback->open
State-Changed-By: lawrance
State-Changed-When: Wed Feb 21 11:13:03 UTC 2007
State-Changed-Why:
Feedback timeout for the second time, it's a free for all.
Responsible-Changed-From-To: lawrance->ports
Responsible-C
I have decided (and started) to make a minor contribution to FreeBSD
by looking at broken ports - in particular those with
[EMAIL PROTECTED] as maintainer - and fixing them. (I guess I do it
just because I like FreeBSD and I want stuff to be tidy.) Enough said.
I started looking at the broken star
Dear porters,
This is just a reminder to please periodically check the list of
unfetchable distfiles at http://people.freebsd.org/~fenner/portsurvey/ .
In particular, the list of ports with no MAINTAINER with distfile
problems, which currently has 212 bad ports, is
http://people.freebsd.org/~f
32 matches
Mail list logo
