Carlos Ramirez wrote:
> Why Ethereal is not in the ports list?
It has been renamed to wireshark:
http://www.freshports.org/net/wireshark/
--
Armin Pirkovitsch
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailma
Thank you very much
-Original Message-
From: Spadge [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Miércoles, 04 de Octubre de 2006 05:20 p.m.
To: Carlos Ramirez
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Ethereal not listed
Carlos Ramirez wrote:
> Hi.-
>
>
>
> Why Ethereal is not in the ports list?
>
Any ETA on when python-2.5 final will be part of the ports tree?
Thanks,
Dan Allen
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
Hello.
arpwatch 2.1.a15_3
arpwatch-devel 2.1.a13_1
Is there a sense in arpwatch-devel port?
--
WBR
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Carlos Ramirez wrote:
Hi.-
Why Ethereal is not in the ports list?
How can I install it?
Thankz
port moved to net/wireshark on 2006-07-17
REASON: Project name has changed
http://www.freshports.org/net/ethereal
and ...
http://www.freshports.org/net/wireshark/
--
Spadge
"Intocc
Hi.-
Why Ethereal is not in the ports list?
How can I install it?
Thankz
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
any autoconf guru here who can help me with the problem described below ?
basically, what is the proper way to tell configure.ac to set CPPFLAGS
and LDFLAGS properly (i.e. according to platform conventions) without
having to put platform-specific code in configure.ac or invoking
./configure with t
On 10/3/06, Anton Berezin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If this does not help you right away, it should at least help you to debug
the problem further:
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/mid.cgi?id=A025299E-A85E-4455-B902-1C96091CDA75%40deniau.org&db=mid
For what it worth, it does not appear to be a pro
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:53:45PM +0200, Jacques S. wrote:
> The problem I have now is that I cannot get the latest Ruby18 port will
> not install in one of the FreeBSD systems I look after. After an
> otherwise apparently normal make and make install, process ruby18 stalls
> at "Generating RI
--On Wednesday, October 04, 2006 10:29:33 +0100 Florent Thoumie
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
The problem i think is that many ports with multiple mirrors will use
mirrors from 3rd world countries first, and the mirrors with real
bandwidth will always be last on the list. Can anyone explain to me w
VANHULLEBUS Yvan writes:
> I recently (a few days ago) sent a pr about a problem with ruby:
> it uses *lots* of RAM to generate some "RDOC" during install, and
> it will cause some memory problems with old computers.
Would it be advantageous to divide things into "ruby" and
"ruby-doc"
On Wed, Oct 04, 2006 at 12:53:45PM +0200, Jacques S. wrote:
> The problem I have now is that I cannot get the latest Ruby18 port will
> not install in one of the FreeBSD systems I look after. After an
> otherwise apparently normal make and make install, process ruby18 stalls
> at "Generating RI
The problem I have now is that I cannot get the latest Ruby18 port will
not install in one of the FreeBSD systems I look after. After an
otherwise apparently normal make and make install, process ruby18 stalls
at "Generating RI" in "sread" state, thrashing the hd or paging memory
in an apparen
On Tue, 2006-10-03 at 19:52 -0400, Mike Jakubik wrote:
> Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > On Tue, Oct 03, 2006 at 05:48:11PM -0500, Paul Schmehl wrote:
> >
> >> I'm building kde3 from ports, and the koffice install attempts to download
> >> the tar.bz2 file from ftp.scarlet.be. The download is about
14 matches
Mail list logo
