Re: is somebody working on a xorg 7.1 port to FreeBSD ?

2006-08-06 Thread vehemens
On Thursday 03 August 2006 23:37, Mark Linimon wrote: > As is asked and answered every week or so: yes. It is not a simple matter > of just plugging it in. Given that it's asked every week, maybe somebody could provide weekly status to cut down on the questions ?} Having tried xorg-modular-exp

Re: Acrobat - linuxpluginwrapper broken again?

2006-08-06 Thread Frank Jahnke
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 00:35 +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > > The same for me: > # firefox about:plugins > LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library > /usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so > [/usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so: Undefined > symb

Can't start mysql 5.0.15

2006-08-06 Thread Arttur Andreev
I have installed mysql 5.0.17 from ports on free bsd 6.0, try to start up using the safe_mysqld --user=mysql 051227 22:22:18 [ERROR] Fatal error: Can't open and lock privilege tables: Table 'mysql.host' doesn't exist 051227 22:22:18 mysqld ended in than problem? :( __

Re: &subject=FreeBSD%20Port:%20xalan-j-2.7.0

2006-08-06 Thread Herve Quiroz
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 03:45:36PM +0200, Robert Gilaard wrote: > why does xalan-j-2.7.0 still needs jdk-1.4.2p8_3 (and thus linux_*) > while we now have the officially announced license to use SUN's java > development kit available on FreeBSD? The xalan-j port used to have issues with Java 1.5.

Re: Acrobat - linuxpluginwrapper broken again?

2006-08-06 Thread Frank Jahnke
On Mon, 2006-08-07 at 00:35 +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > > The same for me: > # firefox about:plugins > LoadPlugin: failed to initialize shared library > /usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so > [/usr/X11R6/Adobe/Acrobat7.0/ENU/Browser/intellinux/nppdf.so: Undefined > symb

extract both bz2 and gz files from distfiles

2006-08-06 Thread Boris Samorodov
Hi! We have got a port (lang/gnat-gcc34) which has both bz2 and gz distfiles. As for 5.x+ extracting is gone automagically. But not at 4.x. Well, at 4.x extracting may be done for example, by using USE_BZIP2 knob and doing gunzipping at after-extract:. Does someone know a better solution? Does w

Re: Acrobat - linuxpluginwrapper broken again?

2006-08-06 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
Frank Jahnke wrote: > I updated Acroread to version 7.0.8 from the earlier 7.0.x along with > Gnome and many other things. After I finished, Acroread would no longer > work in linuxpluginwrapper -- it would not be recognized as a plugin in > either Firefox or Epiphany. I updated libmap.conf to

Acrobat - linuxpluginwrapper broken again?

2006-08-06 Thread Frank Jahnke
I updated Acroread to version 7.0.8 from the earlier 7.0.x along with Gnome and many other things. After I finished, Acroread would no longer work in linuxpluginwrapper -- it would not be recognized as a plugin in either Firefox or Epiphany. I updated libmap.conf to point to the right places, the

Re: conflict check for upcoming merge

2006-08-06 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
michael johnson wrote: > On 8/6/06, [LoN]Kamikaze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> I have written a small script that checks for conflicts that would >> occur if /usr/X11R6 and /usr/local were merged. Whoever is interested >> should mail me. This is the output on my system...pkg . > > Thanks for t

Re: conflict check for upcoming merge

2006-08-06 Thread michael johnson
On 8/6/06, [LoN]Kamikaze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: I have written a small script that checks for conflicts that would occur if /usr/X11R6 and /usr/local were merged. Whoever is interested should mail me. This is the output on my system. ==> Conflict man/man3/Object.3.gz /usr/X11R6/man/man3/Obj

conflict check for upcoming merge

2006-08-06 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
I have written a small script that checks for conflicts that would occur if /usr/X11R6 and /usr/local were merged. Whoever is interested should mail me. This is the output on my system. ==> Conflict man/man3/Object.3.gz /usr/X11R6/man/man3/Object.3.gz:x11-toolkits/open-motif /usr/local/man

hpijs bug report

2006-08-06 Thread h
when compiling hpijs: ===> Generating temporary packing list test -z "/usr/local/bin" || /usr/ports/print/hpijs/work/hpijs-2.1.4/install-sh -d "/usr/local/bin" install -s -o root -g wheel -m 555 'hpijs' '/usr/local/bin/hpijs' test -z "/usr/local/bin" || /usr/ports/print/hpijs/work/hpijs-2.1.

Re: parallel build jobs (-j3) on SMP machine

2006-08-06 Thread Mark Linimon
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 05:55:07PM +0200, Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > Is there a knob to specify the number of parallel build jobs when > compiling a port? (Something like MAKEOPTS="-j3" on Gentoo) Many of the ports are not parallel-build clean, so we have not yet implemented a generic knob. mc

Re: [kde-freebsd] Suggestion for sub port

2006-08-06 Thread Beech Rintoul
On Sunday 06 August 2006 07:36, Michael Nottebrock wrote: > Beech Rintoul schrieb: > > Would it be possible to make a sub port of kmail. Kdepim is a large build > > and the only thing I use out of it is kmail. It would be nice if I could > > just build that part of kdepim. I'm a port maintainer, bu

Re: LOCALBASE vs. X11BASE (head to head deathmatch!)

2006-08-06 Thread michael johnson
On 8/6/06, Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Ok, I'm kidding about the deathmatch part. :) I have put some thought, and testing into this question though, so I thought I would post my results. First the conclusion. IMO the ideal technical sol

Re: parallel build jobs (-j3) on SMP machine

2006-08-06 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
I have good experience with MAKE_ARGS= -j 3 It doesn't work with all ports, but most ports work fine. Markus Trippelsdorf wrote: > Is there a knob to specify the number of parallel build jobs when > compiling a port? (Something like MAKEOPTS="-j3" on Gentoo) ___

parallel build jobs (-j3) on SMP machine

2006-08-06 Thread Markus Trippelsdorf
Is there a knob to specify the number of parallel build jobs when compiling a port? (Something like MAKEOPTS="-j3" on Gentoo) -- Markus ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, se

Re: [kde-freebsd] Suggestion for sub port

2006-08-06 Thread Michael Nottebrock
Beech Rintoul schrieb: > Would it be possible to make a sub port of kmail. Kdepim is a large build and > the only thing I use out of it is kmail. It would be nice if I could just > build that part of kdepim. I'm a port maintainer, but separating out kmail is > beyond my capabilities. > It's b

&subject=FreeBSD%20Port:%20xalan-j-2.7.0

2006-08-06 Thread Robert Gilaard
Hi folks, why does xalan-j-2.7.0 still needs jdk-1.4.2p8_3 (and thus linux_*) while we now have the officially announced license to use SUN's java development kit available on FreeBSD? I want to install mondrian, an olap server on my freebsd i386 server, but I DON't want to pollute my freebsd ins

porttools plist target

2006-08-06 Thread Stanislav Sedov
Hi! The script attached adds new "plist" target to porttools package. Adding it to share/porttools will allow to use the following command: # port plist This target will automatically create pkg-plist with all available substitutions , backuping an old one to pkg-plist.orig. Though, this pkg-pli

cups update commited

2006-08-06 Thread Ion-Mihai Tetcu
Hi, I just updated cups to 1.2.2 and also a lot of fixes to the port. If some things still don't work please submit PRs; please put in as many details as possible and take a look first to see if the problem is known / fixed upstream. Thanks, -- IOnut - Un^d^dregistered ;) FreeBSD "user" "I

Re: LOCALBASE vs. X11BASE (head to head deathmatch!)

2006-08-06 Thread Stanislav Sedov
On Sat, 5 Aug 2006 23:23:59 -0700 (PDT) Doug Barton <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned: > This has been long, so if you're still reading, thanks! :) I hope that it's > useful, and that we can continue having a rational discussion about the pros > and cons of the various alternatives. I think it woul