Dear Sirs,
> CVE report is very unpleasant: "Multiple unspecified vulnerabilities".
> Secunia has more professional report.
>
> RedHat is only vendor who released updates, but they are binary. So,
> there is no known fix now.
Following information maybe help you:
http://bugs.debian.org
Hi,
When compiling mplayer, I get the following error(s):
font_load_ft.c:30:35: fontconfig/fontconfig.h: No such file or directory
font_load_ft.c:93:1: warning: "ALIGN" redefined
In file included from /usr/include/sys/param.h:109,
from ../bswap.h:5,
from font_load
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 11:35:12 +1000
Nick Withers <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dear Nick Withers
With the below answer you have hit the nail right on the head!
Thank you very much for this information.
Dear Daniel Eischen
Thank you for looking into the problem after all. I believe this problem wi
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 16:07:40 -0500, Gábor Kövesdán <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Andrey Chernov wrote:
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 03:54:44PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
It will be hack for reason unknown, I prefer to avoid that.
It is not a hack and it is known reason that you need to honor
Gábor Kövesdán wrote:
> [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
>> Gábor Kövesdán wrote:
>>
>>> [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
>>>
Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 02:59:19PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 13:27:08 -0500, [LoN]Kamikaze
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 11:34:52PM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> Because your make.conf settings are not location sensitive. Remove the
> setting from your make.conf and or environment. Then try:
>
> # make CC=/usr/local/bin/gcc42
>
> You will see, it will not have an effect.
/usr/ports/graphic
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Gábor Kövesdán wrote:
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Andrey Chernov wrote:
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 02:59:19PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 13:27:08 -0500, [LoN]Kamikaze
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Andrey Chernov
Gábor Kövesdán wrote:
> [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
>> Andrey Chernov wrote:
>>
>>> On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 02:59:19PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>>>
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 13:27:08 -0500, [LoN]Kamikaze
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Andrey Chernov wrote:
>
Your mail to 'freebsd-ports' with the subject
Subscribe
Is being held until the list moderator can review it for approval.
The reason it is being held:
SpamAssassin identified this message as possible spam
Either the message will get posted to the list, or you will receive
notification
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
Andrey Chernov wrote:
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 02:59:19PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 13:27:08 -0500, [LoN]Kamikaze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Andrey Chernov wrote:
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 01:16:47PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger
Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 02:59:19PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>> On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 13:27:08 -0500, [LoN]Kamikaze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Andrey Chernov wrote:
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 01:16:47PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jul 200
Andrey Chernov wrote:
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 03:54:44PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
It will be hack for reason unknown, I prefer to avoid that.
It is not a hack and it is known reason that you need to honor CC.
It is not a reason, it is a goal. The reason is the bug true na
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 03:54:44PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> >It will be hack for reason unknown, I prefer to avoid that.
>
> It is not a hack and it is known reason that you need to honor CC.
It is not a reason, it is a goal. The reason is the bug true nature
discovered.
> >I normally s
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 15:20:02 -0500, Andrey Chernov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 02:59:19PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 13:27:08 -0500, [LoN]Kamikaze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>Andrey Chernov wrote:
>>On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 01:16:47PM -0500, Jere
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 02:59:19PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 13:27:08 -0500, [LoN]Kamikaze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >Andrey Chernov wrote:
> >>On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 01:16:47PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> >>>On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:35:14 -0500, Andrey Cher
Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 13:27:08 -0500, [LoN]Kamikaze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
>> Andrey Chernov wrote:
>>> On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 01:16:47PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:35:14 -0500, Andrey Chernov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
>
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 13:27:08 -0500, [LoN]Kamikaze <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Andrey Chernov wrote:
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 01:16:47PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:35:14 -0500, Andrey Chernov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:40:10AM +0200, [LoN]
Shaun Amott wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 07:54:16PM +0200, Remko Lodder wrote:
>> Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
>>> Shaun Amott wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 03:03:43PM +1000, Joel Hatton wrote:
> FYI, Red Hat released an advisory today about a vulnerability in Ruby. So
> far it doesn'
We have a lot of OCaml ports that provides additional language
packages for OCaml language. Installing of such pacakge requites
a lot of steps, e.g. running ocamlfind utility on install/deinstall
with correct enviropment, updating OCaml-specific ld.conf on
in
Hello;
I had the same problems building clisp on amd64, but I reported the amd64 vs
x86_64 issue on sourceforge: I think they fixed it.
The mmap issue is AFAICT, well known. The port has these lines:
.if ${ARCH} == "amd64" || ${ARCH} == "ia64"
CONFIGURE_ARGS+=--disable-mmap
MAKEMAKE_ARGS+= --dis
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 13:24:54 +0530
Gautham Ganapathy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am trying to the the clisp-2.38 port to build on freebsd-6.1-release
> of amd64. However, it does not build and I found a post saying that it
> was marked as b
Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 01:16:47PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
>> On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:35:14 -0500, Andrey Chernov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:40:10AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
The port graphics/png does not honour the CC Var
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 01:16:47PM -0500, Jeremy Messenger wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:35:14 -0500, Andrey Chernov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> wrote:
>
> >On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:40:10AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
> >>The port graphics/png does not honour the CC Variable.
> >
> >I can't reprod
On Fri, 28 Jul 2006 18:35:14 -0500, Andrey Chernov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:40:10AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
The port graphics/png does not honour the CC Variable.
I can't reproduce that, it honors CC for me.
I can, CC=gcc will not change the CC when it com
Andrey Chernov wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 11:40:10AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote:
>> The port graphics/png does not honour the CC Variable.
>
> I can't reproduce that, it honors CC for me.
>
Here's what I get:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] cd /usr/ports/graphics/png
[EMAIL PROTECTED] make -V CC
/usr/
On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 07:54:16PM +0200, Remko Lodder wrote:
>
> Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
> >Shaun Amott wrote:
> >>On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 03:03:43PM +1000, Joel Hatton wrote:
> >>>FYI, Red Hat released an advisory today about a vulnerability in Ruby. So
> >>>far it doesn't appear in the VuXML,
Sergey Matveychuk wrote:
Shaun Amott wrote:
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 03:03:43PM +1000, Joel Hatton wrote:
FYI, Red Hat released an advisory today about a vulnerability in Ruby. So
far it doesn't appear in the VuXML, but am I correct in presuming it will
soon?
I've added it; thanks for the repo
Shaun Amott wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 03:03:43PM +1000, Joel Hatton wrote:
>> FYI, Red Hat released an advisory today about a vulnerability in Ruby. So
>> far it doesn't appear in the VuXML, but am I correct in presuming it will
>> soon?
>>
>
> I've added it; thanks for the report.
>
Can
On Fri, Jul 28, 2006 at 03:03:43PM +1000, Joel Hatton wrote:
>
> FYI, Red Hat released an advisory today about a vulnerability in Ruby. So
> far it doesn't appear in the VuXML, but am I correct in presuming it will
> soon?
>
I've added it; thanks for the report.
--
Shaun Amott [ PGP: 0x6B387A9
The net/asterisk-devel fetchs out sources from SVN
--
Best regards,
Arseny Nasokin
___
freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 23:16:55 +1000
"David Symonds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
>
> The net/obnc port uses CVS to fetch its files; that might be a good
> place to start looking.
>
It uses CVS to prepare tarball for maintainer, not for checkouting
distfiles itself.
--
Stanislav Sedov
On Sat, 29 Jul 2006 13:52:20 +0100
Ian Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> mentioned:
> Hi there,
>
> I'm trying to build a port of PacketForth, (https://packets.goto10.org/)
> and it's going pretty well. However, as it's still in the early stages
> of development, there are no tarfiles available onl
On 7/29/06, Ian Morrison <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi there,
I'm trying to build a port of PacketForth, (https://packets.goto10.org/)
and it's going pretty well. However, as it's still in the early stages
of development, there are no tarfiles available online, and the
preferred method of fetch
Hi there,
I'm trying to build a port of PacketForth, (https://packets.goto10.org/)
and it's going pretty well. However, as it's still in the early stages
of development, there are no tarfiles available online, and the
preferred method of fetching the source is by using the darcs version
cont
Hi
I am trying to the the clisp-2.38 port to build on freebsd-6.1-release
of amd64. However, it does not build and I found a post saying that it
was marked as broken.
So far I have tried the following.
1, After running make, the first error that comes up is
gmake: *** No rule to make target `a
35 matches
Mail list logo
