Re: makewhatis from ports

2006-07-19 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >> Brooks Davis wrote: >>> [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: Thanks for the reply. That means I don't have to take care of it, still it would make more sense to let the ports take care of it. >>> If we're going to do it, setting MAN variables s

Re: [print/cups-base] cups-base-1.2.0_2 installs broken symlink

2006-07-19 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > The port installs a symlink 'reject.8 -> accept.8' in '/usr/local/man/man8', > that should be 'reject.8.gz -> accept.8.gz'. The link 'cupsdisable.8 -> cupsenable.8' is also broken. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http:/

[print/cups-base] cups-base-1.2.0_2 installs broken symlink

2006-07-19 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
The port installs a symlink 'reject.8 -> accept.8' in '/usr/local/man/man8', that should be 'reject.8.gz -> accept.8.gz'. ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to

Re: New portmaster version available for testing/feedback

2006-07-19 Thread Doug Barton
Doug Barton wrote: > I just uploaded a version that has what should be a fix for this, can you > give it a try? And thanks for catching this, you're right, it's an oversight > on my part. Hans, I'm curious if you've had a chance to try that fix, as I'd like to commit the new version sometime soo

fvwm 2.5.17 Issue

2006-07-19 Thread Cy Schubert
Fvwm2 2.5.17 was released, however it contains a nasty little bug which causes it to ignore colour specification for the text in a title bar. Until this issue is addressed, I will hold off on updating the port. If anyone wants an unofficial updated fvwm2-devel port for 2.5.17, it is available at

Re: Module-Build-2802 dependency problem

2006-07-19 Thread Cheng-Lung Sung
Hi, I noticed that now p5-version does not install manpages. I'd try to make a patch for that. Can you investigate that? Thanks, --- Makefile.PL.origWed Jul 19 23:22:09 2006 +++ Makefile.PL Thu Jul 20 10:29:00 2006 @@ -47,6 +47,8 @@ AUTHOR => 'John Peacock

conflicting dependency

2006-07-19 Thread John E Hein
Let's say there are two ports A & B. They both provide libfoo.so.1 (and so register CONFLICTS with each other). Now port C wants to use libfoo (and doesn't care if it gets it from A or B). What does port C list in it's LIB_DEPENDS? What if it lists A and someone installs B... does A get register

Re: FreeBSD Port: sysutils/daemontools

2006-07-19 Thread Donald J. O'Neill
On Wednesday 19 July 2006 17:06, Alan Aldrich wrote: > Not having any luck installing this port > > [3:01pm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/ports/sysutils/daemontools] make install clean > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > => daemontools-0.76.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports

Re: FreeBSD Port: sysutils/daemontools

2006-07-19 Thread Peter Thoenen
> > any idea? > > > > also having problems with dns/djbdns and sysutils/ucspi-tcp with > > similar 'not found' messages I get that all the time, has something to get with however ports pulls files (not sure what ftp app it uses for this). If you get this in the future, just pull it manually via w

Re: FreeBSD Port: sysutils/daemontools

2006-07-19 Thread RW
On Wednesday 19 July 2006 23:06, Alan Aldrich wrote: > Not having any luck installing this port > > [3:01pm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/ports/sysutils/daemontools] make install clean > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > => daemontools-0.76.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports

FreeBSD Port: sysutils/daemontools

2006-07-19 Thread Alan Aldrich
Not having any luck installing this port [3:01pm [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/ports/sysutils/daemontools] make install clean ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found => daemontools-0.76.tar.gz doesn't seem to exist in /usr/ports/ distfiles/. => Attempting to fetch from http://cr.yp.to/d

Re: FreshPorts - scripting help wanted

2006-07-19 Thread Dan Langille
On 19 Jul 2006 at 21:19, Matthew Seaman wrote: > Dan Langille wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > > Some scripting help wanted please. Either Perl or Python. Details > > at > descriptions/> (also known as ).

Re: Core Dump with Apache22 (solved)

2006-07-19 Thread Derrick Edwards
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 02:03:36AM -0400, Derrick Edwards wrote: > On Tuesday 18 July 2006 21:47, Jeremy Chadwick wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 09:47:03PM -0400, Derrick Edwards wrote: > > > Hi, > > > I am using FreeBSD 6.1-RC with apache-2.2.2 which is a VMware machine. > > > Machine wa

Re: fuse-kmod unbuildable on -current

2006-07-19 Thread Anish Mistry
On Wednesday 19 July 2006 13:01, Jiawei Ye wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod]# make > ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found > ===> Found saved configuration for fusefs-kmod-0.3.0_1 > ===> Extracting for fusefs-kmod-0.3.0_1 > => MD5 Checksum OK for fuse4bs

Re: FreshPorts - scripting help wanted

2006-07-19 Thread Matthew Seaman
Dan Langille wrote: > Hi folks, > > Some scripting help wanted please. Either Perl or Python. Details > at descriptions/> (also known as ). Try this. Run it as: cat-parse.pl categories or eve

Re: FreeBSD Port: net/bfilter: rc.d script broken

2006-07-19 Thread Nikolaus Waxweiler
Hi, let us know if that works for you. Works :) ___ freebsd-ports@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

FreshPorts - scripting help wanted

2006-07-19 Thread Dan Langille
Hi folks, Some scripting help wanted please. Either Perl or Python. Details at (also known as ). Thanks -- Dan Langille : Software Developer looking for work my resume: http://www.free

editors/vim several problems

2006-07-19 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
Problem #1) 'make -j' breaks editors/vim already in the configure phase: GUI_INC_LOC="" GUI_LIB_LOC="" CC="cc" CPPFLAGS="" CFLAGS="-O2 -fno-strict-aliasing -pipe -march=pentium-m" LDFLAGS="" srcdir="." ./configure --enable-gui=gtk --with-gtk-prefix=/usr/X11R6 --enable-multibyte

Re: makewhatis from ports

2006-07-19 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
[LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > Brooks Davis wrote: >> On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 11:52:26AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >>> Sergey Matveychuk wrote: [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > I've got a Makefile where I install man pages int PREFIX/man/man1 and the > ports system nicely compresses them, but it does

RE: vim7 broken or not broken or?

2006-07-19 Thread Matt Sealey
What's the "latest toolchain" for 4.9? All my ports are at the latest versions, including gmake and stuff where relevant. Is there a set of ports I should be using to bring it up to a current spec (that uhh. won't rely on me recompiling 400 ports..) or am I okay with what I have? I am having lib

Re: fuse-kmod unbuildable on -current

2006-07-19 Thread Csaba Henk
On 2006-07-19, Jiawei Ye <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In file included from fuse.c:36: > ./fuse.h:78:7: "FUSE_AUX" is not defined [...] > fuse.c:6003:5: "FMASTER" is not defined > fuse.c:6041:5: "FMASTER" is not defined > *** Error code 1 > > Stop in /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod/work/fuse4bsd-0.

Re: vim7 broken or not broken or?

2006-07-19 Thread Mark Linimon
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 11:45:42AM -0500, Matt Sealey wrote: > I got this version from ports the day it hit the tree, an upgrade from > vim6 (using the "vim" port directory). How come if it doesn't compile > on 4.X, I am running it now, compiled from the port? Probably because you are not using th

fuse-kmod unbuildable on -current

2006-07-19 Thread Jiawei Ye
[EMAIL PROTECTED] /usr/ports/sysutils/fusefs-kmod]# make ===> Vulnerability check disabled, database not found ===> Found saved configuration for fusefs-kmod-0.3.0_1 ===> Extracting for fusefs-kmod-0.3.0_1 => MD5 Checksum OK for fuse4bsd-0.3.0.tar.gz. => SHA256 Checksum OK for fuse4bsd-0.3.0.ta

Re: makewhatis from ports

2006-07-19 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
Brooks Davis wrote: > On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 11:52:26AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >> Sergey Matveychuk wrote: >>> [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: I've got a Makefile where I install man pages int PREFIX/man/man1 and the ports system nicely compresses them, but it does not make them available >>

vim7 broken or not broken or?

2006-07-19 Thread Matt Sealey
[EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/ports$ portupgrade -f vim ** Port marked as IGNORE: editors/vim: is marked as broken: does not compile on 4.X; use editors/vim6 instead [EMAIL PROTECTED]:/usr/ports$ vim --version VIM - Vi IMproved 7.0 (2006 May 7, compiled Jul 5 2006 15:35:44) Included patches: 1-

Re: FreeBSD Port: net/bfilter: rc.d script broken

2006-07-19 Thread Doug Barton
Nikolaus Waxweiler wrote: > Hi, > there's a bug in the rc.d script that prevents bfilter from being > stopped: "sig_stop=-KILL" should be "sig_stop=KILL", since the script > adds a "-" automatically. Currently, a "kill --KILL " is issued, > which does nothing. The script waits for bfilter to stop u

How to configure apache-ant to use bsdjava ?

2006-07-19 Thread Hans Lambermont
Hi, I need to install apache-ant (for building openoffice 2.0.3) and have bsdjava installed : jdk-1.4.2p8_3 (and javavmwrapper-2.3) . apache-ant wants to install java/linux-sun-jdk14, which I don't want. How can I configure apache-ant such that bsdjava is used instead of java/linux-sun-jdk14 ? I

Re: RFC: Merging X11BASE to LOCALBASE

2006-07-19 Thread Florent Thoumie
On Tue, 2006-07-18 at 21:43 +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > Dejan Lesjak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > [...] as far as X.org 7 ports themselves go, they right now already > > happily build and install under /usr/X11R6 prefix [...] > > This makes no sense at all, since X.org is (by definition

Re: makewhatis from ports

2006-07-19 Thread Brooks Davis
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 11:52:26AM +0200, [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > > [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: > >> I've got a Makefile where I install man pages int PREFIX/man/man1 and the > >> ports system nicely compresses them, but it does not make them available > >> for whatis. Should I

FreeBSD Port: net/bfilter: rc.d script broken

2006-07-19 Thread Nikolaus Waxweiler
Hi, there's a bug in the rc.d script that prevents bfilter from being stopped: "sig_stop=-KILL" should be "sig_stop=KILL", since the script adds a "-" automatically. Currently, a "kill --KILL " is issued, which does nothing. The script waits for bfilter to stop until it times out. __

Re: Can't install fresh ruby-bdb (was when LOCALBASE is not /usr/local)

2006-07-19 Thread Jim Trigg
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 03:00:09PM +0400, Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > Jim Trigg wrote: > > I'm setting up a new system with 6.1-RELEASE, and I forgot to install > > portupgrade from a package during the OS install. ruby-bdb fails to > > build, complaining that it doesn't know how to make 'all' (it

Re: Can't install fresh ruby-bdb when LOCALBASE is not /usr/local

2006-07-19 Thread Sergey Matveychuk
Jim Trigg wrote: > I'm setting up a new system with 6.1-RELEASE, and I forgot to install > portupgrade from a package during the OS install. ruby-bdb fails to > build, complaining that it doesn't know how to make 'all' (it doesn't > specify which directory it's in, but it's right after it runs > e

graphics/g-graph

2006-07-19 Thread Martin Wilke
Hi friends, i have a small problem with graphics/g-graph: In the current version, the program fails with an error. $ graphed ! Exception '(tk_error "can't find package BWidget") >>> main ARGS ^ Updating the port to 1.6 ( http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=ports/99272

Re: makewhatis from ports

2006-07-19 Thread [LoN]Kamikaze
Sergey Matveychuk wrote: > [LoN]Kamikaze wrote: >> I've got a Makefile where I install man pages int PREFIX/man/man1 and the >> ports system nicely compresses them, but it does not make them available for >> whatis. Should I run makewhatis PREFIX/man manually or is there a way this >> is suppose

Re: RFC: Merging X11BASE to LOCALBASE

2006-07-19 Thread Brandon S. Allbery KF8NH
On Jul 19, 2006, at 4:39 , Erik Trulsson wrote: On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 01:32:06AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 09:43:54PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: This makes no sense at all, since X.org is (by definition) X11R7. They changed the protocol? I thought that was

Re: RFC: Merging X11BASE to LOCALBASE

2006-07-19 Thread Erik Trulsson
On Wed, Jul 19, 2006 at 01:32:06AM -0500, Mark Linimon wrote: > On Tue, Jul 18, 2006 at 09:43:54PM +0200, Dag-Erling Smørgrav wrote: > > This makes no sense at all, since X.org is (by definition) X11R7. > > They changed the protocol? I thought that was what the suffix was > originally for. No,