[Bug 273859] pkgbase: fails to pkg upgrade after base 4e899378bf5d

2023-09-18 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273859 --- Comment #10 from (intentionally left blank) --- (In reply to dfr from comment #4) I have tested the following after removing local reverting commit for base 4e899378bf5d, rebuilding pkgbase, and rolling back the testing jail to 14-ALP

[Bug 273859] pkgbase: fails to pkg upgrade after base 4e899378bf5d

2023-09-18 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273859 --- Comment #11 from d...@rabson.org --- I'm not sure what happened to make pkg confused about libcompiler_rt but its ok to just remove that - literally the only thing in that package is a symlink which got moved to libcompiler_rt-dev. In m

[Bug 273859] pkgbase: fails to pkg upgrade after base 4e899378bf5d

2023-09-18 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273859 --- Comment #12 from (intentionally left blank) --- (In reply to dfr from comment #11) Seems to work fine, although autoremove wanted to remove clang first, and there was a missing dependency warning. # pkg list FreeBSD-libcompiler_rt /u

[Bug 273859] pkgbase: fails to pkg upgrade after base 4e899378bf5d

2023-09-18 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273859 --- Comment #13 from (intentionally left blank) --- >From 14-ALPHA2 to base 501edb1cc76b (WITH_LLVM_BINUTILS) without any reverts: export ABI="FreeBSD:15:amd64" pkg -r /usr/local/poudriere/jails/main upgrade -y FreeBSD-utilities pkg -r /u

[Bug 273859] pkgbase: fails to pkg upgrade after base 4e899378bf5d

2023-09-18 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273859 Mikael Urankar changed: What|Removed |Added CC||mik...@freebsd.org --- Comment #1

[Bug 273859] pkgbase: fails to pkg upgrade after base 4e899378bf5d

2023-09-18 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273859 --- Comment #15 from d...@rabson.org --- I don't fully understand why we have to have a special case for -dev packages with no non-dev package but I think this can be combined into the 'libcompat-dev|liby-dev' one. Probably also need the lib

[Bug 273859] pkgbase: fails to pkg upgrade after base 4e899378bf5d

2023-09-18 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273859 Mikael Urankar changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #244991|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 273859] pkgbase: fails to pkg upgrade after base 4e899378bf5d

2023-09-18 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273859 Mikael Urankar changed: What|Removed |Added Attachment #244995|0 |1 is obsolete|

[Bug 273859] pkgbase: fails to pkg upgrade after base 4e899378bf5d

2023-09-18 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273859 --- Comment #18 from d...@rabson.org --- Testing with something very similar to your latest patch (I misordered the packages because I'm bad at sorting), I was able to upgrade libcompiler_rt-dev cleanly but for the full upgrade still needed

[Bug 273859] pkgbase: fails to pkg upgrade after base 4e899378bf5d

2023-09-18 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273859 Emmanuel Vadot changed: What|Removed |Added CC||m...@freebsd.org --- Comment #19

[Bug 273859] pkgbase: fails to pkg upgrade after base 4e899378bf5d

2023-09-18 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273859 --- Comment #20 from Emmanuel Vadot --- (In reply to Mikael Urankar from comment #17) LGTM, go ahead and commit it. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

[Bug 273859] pkgbase: fails to pkg upgrade after base 4e899378bf5d

2023-09-18 Thread bugzilla-noreply
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=273859 --- Comment #21 from d...@rabson.org --- Or in fact, let Mikael commit. LGTM from me too :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are the assignee for the bug.

PkgBase: documenting package-related issues

2023-09-18 Thread Graham Perrin
: > how can we document all these breakages and workarounds, so that people can just do the equivalent of `do-release-upgrade`? I guess, for some types of issue there can be a package message.