On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 06:31:28PM +0800, Ben Woods wrote:
> On Mon, 2 Mar 2020 at 23:04, Glen Barber wrote:
>
> > On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 09:44:22AM +0800, Ben Woods wrote:
> > > Just wanted to ask if there is a pkgbase repo for 13-CURRENT snapshots
> > ye
On Sat, Feb 29, 2020 at 09:44:22AM +0800, Ben Woods wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> Just wanted to ask if there is a pkgbase repo for 13-CURRENT snapshots yet?
>
> I recently installed one of the official snapshots for FreeBSD 13-CURRENT
> on a laptop, and I am looking to see if there is a way to keep
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 10:46:56AM -0800, Rodney W. Grimes wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 12:46:37PM -0500, Kris Moore wrote:
> > > On 12/04/2017 11:37, Brad Davis wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017, at 09:25 AM, Kris Moore wrote:
> > > >> Anybody else noticed a recent regression (say past mont
On Mon, Dec 04, 2017 at 12:46:37PM -0500, Kris Moore wrote:
> On 12/04/2017 11:37, Brad Davis wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 4, 2017, at 09:25 AM, Kris Moore wrote:
> >> Anybody else noticed a recent regression (say past month or so) where
> >> pkg base of latest HEAD is now failing to throw setuid on some
Adding jhb, in case I'm doing something wrong with etcupdate(8) in this
approach, but gratuitously pinging the list to solicit ideas.
Glen
On Wed, Sep 27, 2017 at 04:30:12PM +0000, Glen Barber wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Over the past two weeks, I spent quite a bit of time looking into using
Hi,
Over the past two weeks, I spent quite a bit of time looking into using
etcupdate(8) to bootstrap /var/db/etcupdate for use with pkg(8), and
here are some of the issues I have run into. The most current diff
tested is attached.
1) A new 'create-packages-files' target was added, which invokes
On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 04:02:29PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 11, 2017 at 04:00:20PM +0200, Baptiste Daroussin wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 04:34:58PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> > > On 10/08/2017 16:21, Glen Barber wrote:
> > > >>
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 11:05:06PM +, Ben Woods wrote:
> On Thu, 10 Aug 2017 at 11:35 pm, Matthew Seaman wrote:
>
> > On 10/08/2017 16:21, Glen Barber wrote:
> > >> * Since we have no mechanism of properly merging changes to /etc
> > >> we simply copy f
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 04:34:58PM +0100, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 10/08/2017 16:21, Glen Barber wrote:
> >> * Since we have no mechanism of properly merging changes to /etc
> >> we simply copy files as needed with pc-updatemanager, and it is
> >> difficult to m
Hi Joe,
On Thu, Aug 10, 2017 at 08:18:19AM -0700, Joe Maloney wrote:
> Thanks for the update Glen. For TrueOS we are running into a few
> interesting scenarios with pkg base which I think may be worth
> mentioning.
>
> * Due to the fact pc-sysinstall installs FreeBSD-* some users
> have packages
Hi,
For those not following svn-src-head (or an equivalent list), there have
been a few pkgbase-related commits recently. Of particular interest:
1) The runtime package now depends on the kernel package. This was
done to force the kernel package to be installed before the userland
so u
On Thu, May 18, 2017 at 06:13:31PM -0700, Mel Pilgrim wrote:
> Upgrading base to pkgs built from r318381:
>
> - FreeBSD-ftp-12.0.s20170518051415 [base] conflicts with
> FreeBSD-runtime-12.0.s20170221010702 [installed] on /etc/pam.d/ftpd
> - FreeBSD-runtime-manuals-12.0.s20170518051415 [base] c
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 12:50:12PM -0700, Mel Pilgrim wrote:
> I've noticed there are dependencies missing between some of the pkgs, but
> it's not an outstanding issue. Is there a master PR or thread for reporting
> them, or should I just open a new PR?
Please open a new one.
Glen
signature.a
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 02:22:09PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 08:17:38AM -0400, Ken Moore wrote:
> > [...]
> > Installed packages to be REMOVED:
> >FreeBSD-bsnmp-profile-12.0.s20170417191621
> >FreeBSD-bsnmp-lib32-p
On Tue, Apr 25, 2017 at 08:17:38AM -0400, Ken Moore wrote:
> Hey everyone, just wanted you all to know we just spotted another couple
> base packages which conflict with each other:
>
> "FreeBSD-runtime-manuals" conflicts with "FreeBSD-bsnmp". Not a huge deal,
> but I was trying to track down why
On Mon, Apr 03, 2017 at 08:31:32AM +0300, Johannes Jost Meixner wrote:
> Hi Glen,
>
> I've been looking through the pkgbase@ archives and it's been a while
> since I've seen an outstanding issues & TODO list.
>
> Could you share the TODO list, so we could help test/fix remaining issues?
>
There
On Mon, Oct 31, 2016 at 10:32:18PM +0800, Ben Woods wrote:
> On 11 July 2016 at 18:40, Ben Woods wrote:
>
> > Hi everyone,
> >
> > I have noticed a number of files which do not seem to be part of the base
> > packages, and as such are not being updated on my system which is using
> > PkgBase. I r
On Wed, Aug 10, 2016 at 03:50:17PM -0700, Mel Pilgrim wrote:
> On 2016-08-10 06:24, krad wrote:
> >true its not elegant though is it, as ultimately it will want to be
> >integrated into a standard patching schedule. I just want to make sure i'm
> >not missing something, or its just in the pipeline.
pkgbase is "beta" for 11.0-RELEASE. Work on fixing the nits will ensue
after 11.0-RELEASE is done. It's unfortunate, but it needs to be
delayed.
Glen
On Mon, Jul 11, 2016 at 10:40:48AM +, Ben Woods wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have noticed a number of files which do not seem to be part of t
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:50:55PM -0700, Colin Percival wrote:
> On 06/29/16 16:38, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> > Around that time (January 2016), Colin Percival has been maintaining a
> > copy of the MANIFESTS in ports-mgmt/poudriere as well.
>
> For the record, I obtained these files by downloading
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 11:46:45PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:38:05PM -0700, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> > On 6/29/2016 4:03 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 03:22:33PM -0700, Yuri wrote:
> > >> On 06/29/2016 14:59, G
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 04:38:05PM -0700, Bryan Drewery wrote:
> On 6/29/2016 4:03 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> > On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 03:22:33PM -0700, Yuri wrote:
> >> On 06/29/2016 14:59, Glen Barber wrote:
> >>> If I understand what you mean correctly,
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 03:22:33PM -0700, Yuri wrote:
> On 06/29/2016 14:59, Glen Barber wrote:
> >If I understand what you mean correctly, that would imply poudriere is
> >responsible for the contents of base.txz, which it is not. I think the
> >better solution (if I unders
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 02:46:26PM -0700, Yuri wrote:
> On 06/29/2016 14:32, Glen Barber wrote:
> >But you raise a good point, poudriere does not have a good way to
> >validate the base.txz unless it also unpacks bootonly.iso (or any of the
> >installer media) and c
On Wed, Jun 29, 2016 at 02:21:00PM -0700, Yuri wrote:
> Both system installer and poudriere jails take images from
> http://ftp.freebsd.org/pub/FreeBSD/releases/
>
> But I can't see that there is a signature anywhere there that is verified
> during the download.
>
> For example, pkg(8) uses the k
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 09:15:49AM -0400, Shawn Webb wrote:
> > On Jun 14, 2016, at 8:06 AM, Glen Barber wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:05:36PM +0300, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> >> 14 июня 2016 г. 10:37 пользователь "Ben Woods"
> >> написа
On Tue, Jun 14, 2016 at 12:05:36PM +0300, Pavel Timofeev wrote:
> 14 июня 2016 г. 10:37 пользователь "Ben Woods" написал:
> >
> > On 14 June 2016 at 09:11, René Ladan wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > I updated my pkgbase installation (11.0-amd64 from a few weeks ago) to
> > > 11.0-ALPHA3. Buildin
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 12:50:20AM +0200, Ben Woods wrote:
> On Monday, 30 May 2016, Glen Barber wrote:
> >
> > In the meantime, would you mind adding this particular issue (not the
> > FreeBSD-zfs package, but the underlying problem) to the PkgBase wiki
> > page?
&
On Mon, May 30, 2016 at 12:13:58AM +0200, Ben Woods wrote:
> Actually, this was a different issue, but I have worked out the problem. It
> relates to r299840.
> https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=299840
>
I didn't notice this change, thank you for tracking it down.
> Basicall
On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 11:00:23AM +0200, Ben Woods wrote:
> On Saturday, 28 May 2016, Ben Woods wrote:
>
> > On 27 May 2016 at 23:00, Glen Barber > > wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:54:12PM +0200, Ben Woods wrote:
> >> > Hi everyone,
&
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:54:12PM +0200, Ben Woods wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I have just completed a packaged base upgrade, and for some reason the
> /etc/rc.d/zfs and /etc/rc.d/zvol scripts are no longer in the
> FreeBSD-runtime package.
>
> Any ideas what the cause is for this?
>
Hmm, no.
C
On Fri, May 27, 2016 at 10:26:22PM +0200, Ben Woods wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I just re-built my FreeBSD 11 base packages, and it seems that as of the
> FreeBSD 11 code slush in r300813 the packages now have version 11.0 instead
> of the datestamp. This is obviously wrong, and if anything maybe th
he issues which surfaced, quirks,
> and other worth to mention notes ? I believe its important.
>
>
>
> > On 19 May 2016, at 23:31, Glen Barber wrote:
> >
> > Despite the schedule adjustment for 11.0-RELEASE to allow additional
> > time to resolve severa
Dear FreeBSD community:
Early this year, it was announced [1] that FreeBSD 11.0-RELEASE would
ship not only with the ability to package the base system with pkg(8),
but the intent to use pkg(8) as the primary binary upgrade mechanism for
the base system.
Despite the schedule adjustment for 11.0-R
On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 09:46:03AM +0200, Ben Woods wrote:
> On 7 May 2016 at 09:41, Glen Barber wrote:
>
> > I think this raises a larger question - did "something" change that
> > otherwise violates POLA? The commit recently was intended to revert
> > a
On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 12:35:10AM -0700, Ngie Cooper (yaneurabeya) wrote:
> (Replying because I kicked the hornet’s nest when my build failed)
> Hi Ben,
>
> > On May 7, 2016, at 00:27, Ben Woods wrote:
> >
> > On Saturday, 7 May 2016, Glen Barber wrote:
> >
On Sat, May 07, 2016 at 09:27:54AM +0200, Ben Woods wrote:
> On Saturday, 7 May 2016, Glen Barber wrote:
>
> > With 'installkernel', the first kernel listed in KERNCONF is installed
> > as the default (/boot/kernel), and subsequent kernels are installed with
> &g
=revision&revision=299088
>
> When PkgBase was announced by Glen Barber in March, note 4 of his email
> stated that multiple kernels would be built and packaged if multiple are
> listed in KERNCONF.
> https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pkgbase/2016-March/32.html
>
>
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 03:42:37PM -0400, Kris Moore wrote:
>
> Hey, another couple potential bugs here. After updating to base
> packages, noticed that some binaries aren't installed suid anymore:
>
> -r-xr-xr-- 2 root wheel 15432 Apr 29 15:18 /sbin/shutdown
>
This seems like a potential pk
On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 07:50:54PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2016 at 03:42:37PM -0400, Kris Moore wrote:
> >
> > Hey, another couple potential bugs here. After updating to base
> > packages, noticed that some binaries aren't installed suid anymore:
&
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 06:37:45AM +, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 03:55:51PM +0200, Henry Vogt wrote:
> > Hi,
> > attempting to test pkgbase according to the new wiki page
> > https://wiki.freebsd.org/PkgBase
> >
> > As of FreeBSD 11.0-r2987
On Fri, Apr 29, 2016 at 03:55:51PM +0200, Henry Vogt wrote:
> Hi,
> attempting to test pkgbase according to the new wiki page
> https://wiki.freebsd.org/PkgBase
>
> As of FreeBSD 11.0-r298768 the third step ('make packages') fails - the
> only variation to the wiki described method i have is havin
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 05:08:39PM -0300, Renato Botelho wrote:
> > On Apr 26, 2016, at 16:53, Glen Barber wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 03:47:14PM -0400, Kris Moore wrote:
> >> On 04/26/16 03:40 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
> >>>> On
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 04:08:15PM -0400, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> > One (other kludge) I was considering was automatically invoking
> > etcupdate(8) on 'FreeBSD-runtime' installation, which should
> > automatically populate /etc on a clean install, as well as keeping /etc
> > updated
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 03:47:14PM -0400, Kris Moore wrote:
> On 04/26/16 03:40 PM, Renato Botelho wrote:
> >> On Apr 26, 2016, at 14:54, Kris Moore wrote:
> >>
> >>
> >> So, we're in the process of moving to package base for PC-BSD -CURRENT
> >> images next month. The only real nit I'm seeing so
On Mon, Apr 25, 2016 at 10:40:24AM +0800, Alastair Hogge wrote:
> Will /usr/src/release/release.sh eventually support building base packages
> as an option?
Yes.
Glen
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Apr 19, 2016 at 12:05:47PM -0300, Renato Botelho wrote:
> I’m doing some tests and noted /etc/rc is not part of any package.
Yes, I'm looking into this. Former change somehow broke this, but the
fix then breaks etcupdate for those not using packages.
Glen
signature.asc
Description: PG
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 11:02:12PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> > This granularity allows easy removal of things that may not be wanted
> > (such as *-debug*, *-profile*, etc.) on systems with little storage. On
> > one of my testing systems, I removed the tests packages and all debug
> > an
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:21:28PM -0700, Nathan Whitehorn wrote:
>
>
> On 04/18/16 12:14, Glen Barber wrote:
> >On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:01:46PM -0700, Sean Fagan wrote:
> >>On Apr 18, 2016, at 11:52 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> >>>I understand, that maybe
On Mon, Apr 18, 2016 at 12:01:46PM -0700, Sean Fagan wrote:
> On Apr 18, 2016, at 11:52 AM, Lev Serebryakov wrote:
> >
> > I understand, that maybe it is too late, but ARE YOU KIDDING?! 755
> > packages?! WHY?! What are reasons and goals to split base in such
> > enormous number of packages?
>
>
On Sat, Apr 16, 2016 at 09:28:05PM -0400, Nikolai Lifanov wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Can we remove the date from package
> versions please? The ${ABI} and revision
> describe which source was built and it's
> a bit odd that a package built before and
> after midnight has different versions.
>
> Another
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 06:15:11PM -0700, Sean Fagan wrote:
> On Apr 6, 2016, at 6:10 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > I have an uncommitted patch that, I think, does not affect the behavior
> > overall, but this just worked for me:
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 08:36:25PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 08:24:03PM +0000, Glen Barber wrote:
> > On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 11:31:49AM -0700, Sean Fagan wrote:
> > > On Apr 5, 2016, at 4:29 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> > > >>>>>&
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 08:24:03PM +, Glen Barber wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 11:31:49AM -0700, Sean Fagan wrote:
> > On Apr 5, 2016, at 4:29 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > > The problem should be resolved as of r297598.
On Wed, Apr 06, 2016 at 11:31:49AM -0700, Sean Fagan wrote:
> On Apr 5, 2016, at 4:29 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> > The problem should be resolved as of r297598. The issue was setting
> > DESTDIR as 'DESTDIR=${DESTDIR:U${WSTAGEDIR}}',
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 04:51:33PM -0700, Sean Fagan wrote:
> On Mar 22, 2016, at 2:05 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> >>>>>>
> > Can the three of you please try with r297197 applied (attached for
> > convenience). In quick evaluation, I believe this should fi
On Wed, Mar 23, 2016 at 03:43:18PM +0100, Marko Turk wrote:
> it still doesn't work for me. I get the same error as before.
>
> METALOG file contains some paths with MAKEOBJDIRPREFIX and some without
> this.
> For example:
> ./bin type=dir uname=root gname=wheel mode=0755
> ./boot type=dir uname=r
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 01:31:34PM -0700, Sean Fagan wrote:
> On Mar 22, 2016, at 1:22 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> >>>>
> > I think DESTDIR is what is causing the problem for you, but I would need
> > more of the build log in order to confirm this. I have kicked a bui
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 03:06:04PM -0400, Kris Moore wrote:
> On 03/22/16 12:48 PM, Glen Barber wrote:
> > On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:51:08AM -0400, Kris Moore wrote:
> >> Hey, trying out the 'make packages' branch, running into this issue
> >> after doing b
On Tue, Mar 22, 2016 at 11:51:08AM -0400, Kris Moore wrote:
>
> Hey, trying out the 'make packages' branch, running into this issue
> after doing build{world|kernel}
>
> ... snip ...
>
> kldxref
> /usr/obj/tmp/build/gDAE/pcbsd/git/freebsd/amd64.amd64/kernelstage/tmp/build/gDAE/pcbsd/fbsd-dist/ke
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 12:11:57PM -0700, Sean Fagan wrote:
> pkg: open(/bin/sh): No such file or directory
>
> Any idea what that is? (Well, I know that the worldstage directory
> is empty. So I’m sure that starts with what I’m doing wrong.)
>
The only explanation I can see for why this would
On Mon, Mar 21, 2016 at 06:35:25PM +0100, Marko Turk wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to build base packages on code from git
> 086e6f562ffbb6de24f1e51c7df40f403dd1522b (I'm not sure which svn
> revision this is, last commit is on Mon Mar 14 18:54:29 2016 +).
>
> I'm runinig the following (on 10-S
On Tue, Mar 08, 2016 at 03:40:16PM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 02, 2016 at 11:54:29PM +0000, Glen Barber wrote:
>
> > To obtain the sources for testing, please use the projects/release-pkg
> > branch:
> >
> > # svn co svn://svn.freebsd.org/base
Sorry, missed this reply.
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 08:12:52AM +, Matthew Seaman wrote:
> On 04/03/2016 01:09, Glen Barber wrote:
> >> I was prepared to freak out at this, but with half the packages
> >> > consisting of debugging symbols for binaries that ship stripped i
On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 01:53:42AM +0100, Dimitry Andric wrote:
> On 03 Mar 2016, at 00:54, Glen Barber wrote:
> >
> > For those who have missed the initial email surrounding this topic, we
> > are planning on packaging the base system with pkg(8) for 11.0-RELEASE.
>
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 01:02:55PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> >> I'm not convinced that it makes
> >> much sense to have all the different -lib32-* variants given the
> >> normal use case is runtime-only.
>
> > For those who have no need for lib32 stuff, we do not want to enforce
On Fri, Mar 04, 2016 at 09:05:08AM -0500, Nikolai Lifanov wrote:
> On 03/03/16 20:09, Glen Barber wrote:
> >> I note also that
> >> > "make packages" doesn't work with -jN, but "make release" never worked
> >> > in parallel either, a
On Thu, Mar 03, 2016 at 07:58:06PM -0500, Garrett Wollman wrote:
> < said:
>
> > After checking out the project branch, build the userland and kernel as
> > normal with the 'buildworld' and 'buildkernel' targets. Afterward,
> > packages can be created with the 'packages' target.
>
> > # cd /usr
For those who have missed the initial email surrounding this topic, we
are planning on packaging the base system with pkg(8) for 11.0-RELEASE.
https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pkgbase/2016-January/00.html
At this time, I believe the major blockers and critical issues have been
reso
On Thu, Feb 04, 2016 at 09:41:24AM +0300, Slawa Olhovchenkov wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 29, 2016 at 05:35:06PM +0000, Glen Barber wrote:
>
> > TODO List / Wish List:
>
> Mergering /etc is very important task.
> Currently all /etc is very hardcoded, for example: on all systems
70 matches
Mail list logo
