State Mismatch and tcp.closed

Hi list! I had a problem with state mismatch on my DB server that I solved by lowering the tcp.closed timeout. I setted it to 2 instead of 90. I now have what looks like the same problem on the front-end web server. However, when I tried to apply the same fix, I got connection problem with t

Re: State Mismatch and tcp.closed

Max Laier a écrit : On Thursday 28 May 2009 18:02:40 Martin Turgeon wrote: What am I missing? Which version of FreeBSD are you running? This problem (aka kern/125261) is supposed to be fixed by: SVN rev 181295 on 2008-08-04 14:42:09Z by mlaier (in head) and SVN rev 181596 on 2008-08-11 17

Re: State Mismatch and tcp.closed

Martin Turgeon a écrit : Hi list! I had a problem with state mismatch on my DB server that I solved by lowering the tcp.closed timeout. I setted it to 2 instead of 90. I now have what looks like the same problem on the front-end web server. However, when I tried to apply the same fix, I got

Re: State Mismatch and tcp.closed

Am Fr, 29.05.2009, 17:32, schrieb Martin Turgeon: Martin Turgeon a écrit : Hi list! I had a problem with state mismatch on my DB server that I solved by lowering the tcp.closed timeout. I setted it to 2 instead of 90. I now have what looks like the same problem on the front-end web server. Howe

Routing with external interface doesn't work after a while

Hi everyone, I've been reading the mailing list for a while, but it's my first post. I'm not sure what is causing the problem so I'm posting to multiple lists. I'm running FreeBSD 6.1 on a Celeron 2.8GHz with 512Mo of RAM. It looks likes after a while (a couple of weeks) the routing isn't worki

RE: Routing with external interface doesn't work after a while

hanks anyway Martin -Message d'origine- De : Erik Norgaard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : 18 octobre 2006 10:30 À : Martin Turgeon Cc : freebsd-pf@freebsd.org; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Objet : Re: Routing with external interface doesn't work after a while

RE: Routing with external interface doesn't work after a while

You're right on this, the filtering rules aren't written with the brackets. But isn't pf routing the packets to an interface instead of an IP address. Thanks a lot Martin -Message d'origine- De : Erik Norgaard [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Envoyé : 18 octobre 2006 12:4

Details about tags

Hi, I was running PF with tags for a while but I learnt yesterday that the half of my config was useless. In fact, every out rules that were checking the tags were never triggered because of the keep state of the in rules. I followed the FAQ on the OpenBSD website (http://openbsd.org/faq/pf/tag

PF in kernel or as a module

method. Thank you, Martin Turgeon ___ freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"

Re: PF in kernel or as a module

Max Laier a écrit : On Tuesday 23 January 2007 22:57, Martin Turgeon wrote: I would like to start a debate on this subject. Which method of enabling PF is the more secure (buffer overflow for example), the fastest, the most stable, etc. I searched the web for some info but without result