that's backwards to good practice.
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe
#x27;t
PF supposed to do that for me?
(And yes, Sendmail also has this non-working "feature", but that's OT.)
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
|Added
>
> CC||jpaet...@freebsd.org
> Resolution|--- |Overcome By Events
> Status|In Progress |Closed
An interesting way to close a bug...
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those wh
k (FreeBSD 10.3).
Does anyone have a working config that they can share, to give me a leg
up?
Thanks.
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
https://list
Hmmm, no replies. Does this mean that no-one is using this useful
feature, is using it but is not willing to share, or it's known not to
work at all and are too embarrassed to say so?
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."
Quite likely I've been doing something fundamentally wrong, but it's
too late in the day now for me to be playing with firewalls...
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."
___
freebsd-pf@
:42:25 aneurin sm-mta[73012]: v8UMgFNw073012: [196.196.27.126] did not
issue MAIL/EXPN/VRFY/ETRN during connection to IPv4
What have I done wrong? Does max-src-conn-rate actually work?
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security w
On Sun, 1 Oct 2017, Dave Horsfall wrote:
10.3-RELEASE-p21
I am trying to restrict woodpecker attempts to my mail server (stupid
spamware regards rejects and a long banner it as a challenge), and
following advice on this list I used the following (the important bit,
anyway):
#
# No
two sorts of Windoze
boxes: those that are compromised, and those that soon will be...
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/ma
On Thu, 5 Oct 2017, Dave Horsfall wrote:
is anything added to the table (pfctl -t woodpeckers -T show)
I have lots of them because I've been adding them by hand, but this time
I'll hold back and observe, just to be sure.
No, they are not being added; here's an extract fr
to localhost
Anyone else noticed this?
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
On Fri, 20 Oct 2017, Max wrote:
set skip on lo
(or set skip on lo0)
Already have it...
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.free
enabled for the table (and some of them are damned
persistent).
Sorry for the noise; I'll just quietly slink off now and keep quiet for a
while...
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."
__
[ Charity drivel ]
Is this list now a FreeBSD-approved spamming list?
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Those who don't understand security will suffer."
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinf
On Mon, 19 Feb 2018, Brent Watson wrote:
Would you be interested in Southern California Linux Expo - SCALE ?
The issue of spammers being able to post to this list aside, this might be
a good opportunity to show the Penguins what a real OS looks like :-)
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU
I can't get access to kernel sauce right now, but I'm hitting over 1,000
entries from woodpeckers[*] etc; is there some upper limit, or is it just
purely dynamic?
aneurin% freebsd-version
10.4-RELEASE-p9
[*]
A fairly loose definition in the anti-spammer community, but it includes
attempt
Thanks, all, for your suggestions; I suspect that this ancient server with
but 512MB memory will need upgrading soon :-)
Thankfully, all it does at the moment is act as my mail/web server, and an
internal firewall to the Mac and Penguin boxes; I do my development work
on the Mac[*], and test i
I didn't know that spam was allowed on the -pf list.
Hint: I got -ports to be subscriber-only... Does FreeBSD Inc. support
spammers, or not?
If you want to post to a mailing list (every spammers' wet dream) then
you'd better be a member of it (the few "help" lists excepted, of course,
of wh
Is freebsd-pf a spam-magnet i.e. anyone can post to it?
-- Dave
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@freebsd.org"
I didn't know that spammers were welcome on this list; it's trivial to
block them if you really want to, otherwise this list is merely a
spam-support service (meaning that its servers are likely to be blocked).
-- Dave
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org maili
s.
As a quick test, I disallow *all* SMTP. Still works.
So, err, does PF actually work? Have I stuffed up somewhere?
Thanks.
--
Dave Horsfall (VK2KFU) "Bliss is a MacBook with a FreeBSD server."
http://www.horsfall.org/spam.html (and check the home page whilst you're there)
_
g SMTP as a test, hence my
question as to whether PF was actually working here.
Also don't forget my other observation that wasn't created
until I did so by hand.
--
Dave Horsfall (VK2KFU) "Bliss is a MacBook with a FreeBSD server."
http://www.horsfall.org/spam.html (
e sure with output of pfctl -s all that pf is actually enabled to
> do filtering on packets.
Attached; the empty "FILTER RULES" looks a bit suspicious...
> NOTE: You enable pf by running pfctl -e
I know; I was using "service pf restart" as well.
--
Dave Horsfall (VK2
Further to this, it's behaving as though it's parsing the rules but not
actually honouring them. Ring any bells with anyone? If I had an OpenBSD
box to hand then I'd swap it in, but I don't.
--
Dave Horsfall (VK2KFU) "Bliss is a MacBook with a FreeBSD server.
efault pf config file. Your pf.conf file has a bunch of rules,
> none of which are shown in the pfctl output.
That's what I thought, but:
a) it flags syntax errors.
b) it's reading the /etc/spammers file.
--
Dave Horsfall (VK2KFU) "Bliss is a MacBook with a FreeBSD serve
Meant to go to list; I was interrupted by a phone call at the crucial
moment...
--
Dave Horsfall (VK2KFU) "Bliss is a MacBook with a FreeBSD server."
http://www.horsfall.org/spam.html (and check the home page whilst you're there)
-- Forwarded message --
Date:
On Tue, 4 Nov 2014, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> The rules? Not a sausage. It's behaving as though it's reading the
> file (which it is), but not honouring the rules themselves (which it
> isn't).
A bit more progress; I finally got around to tracing it, and the salient
bit
On Wed, 5 Nov 2014, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> 13925 pfctlCALL ioctl(0x3,DIOCSETDEBUG,0xbfbfdc84)
> 13925 pfctlRET ioctl 0
> 13925 pfctlCALL ioctl(0x3,DIOCSETSTATUSIF,0xbfbfdc5c)
> 13925 pfctlRET ioctl -1 errno 22 Invalid argument
>
> Aha... So, what
On Sat, 8 Nov 2014, Dave Horsfall wrote:
> Same thing on FreeBSD 8.2-RELEASE-p9 (GENERIC); I'll summon up the
> courage and try 9.3 or whatever.
I went to 8.4-RELEASE-p19 instead (and noted a few weird things in the
ports department), and it still ain't working; I disabled in
I'll do what I did on my
MacBook (its ports is based on FreeBSD's) i.e. blow it away and reinstall
the entire ports tree.
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Bliss is a MacBook with a FreeBSD server."
http://www.horsfall.org/spam.html (and check the home page whilst you&
11246 Bytes: 489992 States: 0 ]
-
Thanks.
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Bliss is a MacBook with a FreeBSD server."
http://www.horsfall.org/spam.html (and check the home page whilst you're there)
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing li
I'm having difficulty in understanding just what this has to do with PF...
Or is every FreeBSD list getting spammed?
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Bliss is a MacBook with a FreeBSD server."
http://www.horsfall.org/spam.html (and check the home page whil
le.
Judicious use of "-v" would appear to be indicated here, along with the
aforementioned optional clearing.
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Bliss is a MacBook with a FreeBSD server."
http://www.horsfall.org/spam.html (and check the home page whilst you're there)
---
lge) so it's not worth the
hassle. And anyway, I've screwed up the ports area Yet Again from a
failure to read simple instructions :-(
--
Dave Horsfall DTM (VK2KFU) "Bliss is a MacBook with a FreeBSD server."
http://www.horsfal
On Mon, 29 Jun 2015, Milan Obuch wrote:
> Thanks for hint, there is some logic in there, however
>
> grep /etc/*
>
> yields nothing, it is never mentioned in any config, just as part of
> pool in pf.conf statement
What about "grep -r"? My ACLs are under /etc/
35 matches
Mail list logo