=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ermal_Lu=E7i?= wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Sami Halabi wrote:
> > This was actually discussed much before, as I read it would make some
> > issues with the new pf-smp work done by gleb.
> >
> Not really since Gleb just changed the locking and nothing else.
> All his wo
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ermal_Lu=E7i?= wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Sami Halabi wrote:
> > > This was actually discussed much before, as I read it would make some
> > > issues with the new pf-smp work done by gleb.
> > >
> > Not reall
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ermal_Lu=E7i?= wrote:
> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Sami Halabi wrote:
> > > This was actually discussed much before, as I read it would make some
> > > issues with the new pf-smp work done by gleb.
> > >
> > Not reall
On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 10:00 AM, Ermal Luçi wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2012 at 3:13 PM, Ian FREISLICH wrote:
>
>> =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Ermal_Lu=E7i?= wrote:
>> > On Tue, Nov 20, 2012 at 9:07 AM, Sami Halabi wrote:
>> > > This was actually discussed much before, as I read it would make some
>> > > issue
> > Today its a null op. So it voids the keyword which should be deprecated in
> > FreeBSD or should be reintroduced!
> > Also it may break people assumptions on it.
>
> So I take it that "set state-policy if-bound" will no longer have any
> effect either? Is this expected to hit 10.0-RELEASE?
>
