Hi, All!
PF-NAT in FreeBSD does not support multiple
instances of pptp connections from internal network.
If it will be improved in some time in the future?
What about using libalias in pf or if it possible
to use ng_nat in pf?
May be I'm klueless... please, point me in right
direction. :)
--
Look this options: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/options.html in your pf.conf.
Gilberto
2006/11/30, Artyom Viklenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
Hi, All!
PF-NAT in FreeBSD does not support multiple
instances of pptp connections from internal network.
If it will be improved in some time in the future?
> Look this options: http://www.openbsd.org/faq/pf/options.html in your
> pf.conf.
Sorry, which option exactly you mention?
>
> Gilberto
>
> 2006/11/30, Artyom Viklenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
>> Hi, All!
>>
>> PF-NAT in FreeBSD does not support multiple
>> instances of pptp connections from inter
Maybe this:
set limit option value
Set various limits on pf's operation.
* frags - maximum number of entries in the memory pool used
for packet reassembly (scrub rules). Default is 5000.
* src-nodes - maximum number of entries in the memory pool
used for tracking source IP address
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 02:03:57PM -0200, Gilberto Villani Brito wrote:
> Try change this options.
None of those will help if you really want two concurrent PPTP
connections to the same external peer.
pf doesn't look into the payload of PPTP packets and hence can't decide
which internal peer to
There's no way to share various PPTP client conections to the same
PPTP server. pf nat only can handle one at the time, since there's no
dst and src port to make more than one nat state.
Thats what I heard.
--
Aristeu Gil Alves Jr
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd
On 11/30/06, Daniel Hartmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thu, Nov 30, 2006 at 02:03:57PM -0200, Gilberto Villani Brito wrote:
> Try change this options.
None of those will help if you really want two concurrent PPTP
connections to the same external peer.
pf doesn't look into the payload of
The solution I know is to make a vpn tunnel between the firewall and
the PPTP server and allow the clients use the vpn tunnel.
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "
I was wondering if I could get some opinions on this ruleset please -
Basically, I have FreeBSD6.1, running an IRC server on ports 6697, 7000,
6659 thorough to 6671, , 27888. I am also running a nameserver, so have
opened TCP and UDP 53. I also want incoming on port 80 and 22.
I have about
On Sun, Nov 26, 2006 at 01:35:57PM -, Daniel wrote:
> I was wondering if I could get some opinions on this ruleset please -
>
> Basically, I have FreeBSD6.1, running an IRC server on ports 6697, 7000,
> 6659 thorough to 6671, , 27888. I am also running a nameserver, so have
> opened TCP
Aristeu Gil Alves Jr wrote:
> There's no way to share various PPTP client conections to the same
> PPTP server. pf nat only can handle one at the time, since there's no
> dst and src port to make more than one nat state.
>
> Thats what I heard.
There is no src/dst port but there is Call ID in the
On Fri, Dec 01, 2006 at 12:25:13AM +0100, Sten Daniel Sørsdal wrote:
> Just about any cheap home firewall can do it these days, i
> wonder why the open source community is reluctant to take advantage.
The "if a $50 commercial box can do it, why can't pf?" argument pops up
every now and then, mayb
12 matches
Mail list logo
