Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
S Tracker Resp. Description
o kern/82271 pf [pf] cbq scheduler cause bad latency
f kern/86072 pf [pf] Packet Filter rule
Hi;
I have many ports open for various functions, email, ftp, squid, pound,
various instances of zope, etc. Of course, all of them are libel to be
attacked. What does one do? My research indicates ALF is a viable option, but
I can't find an open source version. I presume putting another box
On 9/4/06, Ted Johnson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have many ports open for various functions, email, ftp, squid, pound, various
instances of zope, etc. Of course, all of them are libel to be attacked.
What does one do?
There's this thing called pf, you should really look into it. Start wit
Hi,
> On Fri, 1 Sep 2006 21:22:45 +0200
> [EMAIL PROTECTED](Max Laier) said:
> Thinking about this for a bit we might want to use the patch below
> instead. i.e. do the fixup locally in the pfil wrapper instead. This
> way other filters don't break if they have adapted to the new wor
Synopsis: Using pf stateful rules for inet6 fails for connections originating
from the firewall itself to a service running on thesame box
State-Changed-From-To: open->feedback
State-Changed-By: suz
State-Changed-When: Tue Sep 5 03:54:33 UTC 2006
State-Changed-Why:
patch is proposed by Max Laier
The following reply was made to PR kern/102647; it has been noted by GNATS.
From: SUZUKI Shinsuke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org,
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED],
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: kern/102647: Using pf stateful rules
