actually, could you please tell whats the difference?
thanks in advance.
On 8/20/06, Kian Mohageri <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 8/18/06, Ivan Levchenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You need to either load the pf kernel module, which can be done by adding
> pf_load="YES" to /boot/loader.conf
Hi;
Let me try this again. Here's the beginning of my pf.conf:
1. # SETTING THE STAGE
2. # macros
3. ext_if="vr0"
4. int_if="lo0"
5. http_ports="80 8080 7080"
6. ssh_ports="22"
7. ftp_ports="21 8021 7021"
8. smtp_ports="25"
9. pop3_ports="110"
10. https_ports="443"
11. imap_ssl_ports="993 143"
12
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 10:47:17AM -0400, beno wrote:
> Apparently, it doesn't like *one* my nested macros in line #16 (it likes
> all the others) and it doesn't like the CIDR netmask in line 22. Someone
> suggested I research the archives concerning the latter "where this
> known problem was a
Daniel Hartmeier wrote:
If you don't care about that, the short answer is that the '/' in the
CIDR notation makes a difference, and you'll have to accept this as a
parser peculiarity. Alternatively you can send in a patch or request
your money back.
You mean, NOBODY has dealt with this problem
> Let me try this again. Here's the beginning of my pf.conf:
>
> 1. # SETTING THE STAGE
> 2. # macros
> 3. ext_if="vr0"
> 4. int_if="lo0"
> 5. http_ports="80 8080 7080"
> 6. ssh_ports="22"
> 7. ftp_ports="21 8021 7021"
> 8. smtp_ports="25"
> 9. pop3_ports="110"
> 10. https_ports="443"
> 11. imap_s
On Monday 21 August 2006 17:47, beno wrote:
> Daniel Hartmeier wrote:
> > If you don't care about that, the short answer is that the '/' in the
> > CIDR notation makes a difference, and you'll have to accept this as a
> > parser peculiarity. Alternatively you can send in a patch or request
> > your
On Mon, Aug 21, 2006 at 11:47:08AM -0400, beno wrote:
> You mean, NOBODY has dealt with this problem before?! Are there no
> work-arounds?? What does everyone else do when faced with this problem??
*plonk*
Daniel
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing lis
Max Laier wrote:
22. directv_ip_addresses="69.19.0.0/17"
23. shadday_ip_addresses=""
24. ssh_ip_addresses="{" $shinjiru_ip_addresses $directv_ip_addresses
$shadday_ip_addresses "}"
Here's what I get when I try to load it:
server167# pfctl -f /etc/pf.conf
/etc/pf.conf:24: syntax error
pfctl: Synt
On 8/21/06, beno <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Daniel supplied the pointer to one (of several) threads on this matter
> above.
>
You must be referring to this URL:
http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=11484264352&r=1&w=2
Unfortunately, it doesn't load, so that's not of any use.
Loads here, your I
Bill Marquette wrote:
Loads here, your ISP must be blocking it. Here's the subect lines
from that thread and the authors for you to Google - should be able to
find this thread on any number of mailing list archive sites.
1. 2006-05-26 Re: Recursive macro expansion problems
openbsd-p Daniel Har
On Monday 21 August 2006 19:32, beno wrote:
> Bill Marquette wrote:
> > Loads here, your ISP must be blocking it. Here's the subect lines
> > from that thread and the authors for you to Google - should be able
> > to find this thread on any number of mailing list archive sites.
> >
> > 1. 2006-05
Max Laier wrote:
printf 'list="{ 10/8, 192.168.0/24 }"\npass from $list to any\n' |
pfctl -nvf-
list = "{ 10/8, 192.168.0/24 }"
pass inet from 10.0.0.0/8 to any
pass inet from 192.168.0.0/24 to any
I'm sure I misunderstand. Here is *my* code:
shinjiru_ip_addresses="202.71.102.114 202.71.10
Current FreeBSD problem reports
Critical problems
Serious problems
S Tracker Resp. Description
o kern/82271 pf [pf] cbq scheduler cause bad latency
f kern/86072 pf [pf] Packet Filter rule
beno wrote:
> Max Laier wrote:
> > printf 'list="{ 10/8, 192.168.0/24 }"\npass from $list to any\n' |
> > pfctl -nvf-
> >
> > list = "{ 10/8, 192.168.0/24 }"
> > pass inet from 10.0.0.0/8 to any
> > pass inet from 192.168.0.0/24 to any
> >
> I'm sure I misunderstand. Here is *my* code:
>
> shi
14 matches
Mail list logo
