Old Synopsis: PF on Freebsd 6.1-STABLE doesn't block IPv6
New Synopsis: [pf] PF on Freebsd 6.1-STABLE doesn't block IPv6
Responsible-Changed-From-To: freebsd-bugs->freebsd-pf
Responsible-Changed-By: linimon
Responsible-Changed-When: Thu Jul 27 06:58:35 UTC 2006
Responsible-Changed-Why:
Over to ma
Synopsis: [pf] PF on Freebsd 6.1-STABLE doesn't block IPv6
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: dhartmei
State-Changed-When: Thu Jul 27 09:33:52 UTC 2006
State-Changed-Why:
not a bug, submitter agrees.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=100879
___
On Thursday 27 July 2006 01:28, Nick Barkas wrote:
> There is a feature from OpenBSD's carp implementation that allows one to
> specify which device a carp interface will use, similar to how vlan
> devices are associated to a physical interface with the vlandev option
> to ifconfig. The change to s
Synopsis: pfctl(8) -k non-functional
State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
State-Changed-By: mlaier
State-Changed-When: Thu Jul 27 11:56:45 UTC 2006
State-Changed-Why:
As described above, this seems to be a misunderstanding. Thanks.
http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=96150
___
On 7/26/06, Lyndon Nerenberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
In the OpenBSD implementation, the 'nat' statement implicitly enables
'keep state' behaviour, therefore a separate rule is not required.
You're right, I was forgetting that his "default block" rule applied
only to inbound traffic, otherwis
Daniel and all on list,
Thank you and mea culpa, I should have tried that first. tcpdump showed
no packets coming in from the inside network on em1 (even with pf
disabled), although the aggregate port switch saw them. so it is either
bad switch configuration (likely, my first time with a Del
Hi Guys,
I've be struggling the past few days setting up a VLAN network. Here is the
situation. I have a Netgear 24-port managed switch inside an office
building. I'd like to give each tenant its own vlan, which will then go to
our FreeBSD router and out to the internet. I had it working fine o
