Re: cleanup_pf_zone()

2006-12-30 Thread Max Laier
at was really going on. > > F.Y.I. > > On 12/29/06, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Friday 29 December 2006 04:07, Earl Lapus wrote: > > > Just a small query about cleanup_pf_zone() in pf_ioctl.c > > > > > > All of the allocated struc

Re: cleanup_pf_zone()

2006-12-29 Thread Earl Lapus
. Sorry for not giving all the details in my first post. I just wasn't sure what was really going on. F.Y.I. On 12/29/06, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Friday 29 December 2006 04:07, Earl Lapus wrote: > Just a small query about cleanup_pf_zone() in pf_ioctl.c > > All

Re: cleanup_pf_zone()

2006-12-29 Thread Max Laier
On Friday 29 December 2006 04:07, Earl Lapus wrote: > Just a small query about cleanup_pf_zone() in pf_ioctl.c > > All of the allocated structures using UMA_CREATE() in pfattach() > were detroyed using UMA_DESTROY() in cleanup_pf_zone() except > for pfr_kentry_pl2. > > Is ther

cleanup_pf_zone()

2006-12-29 Thread Earl Lapus
hi all, Just a small query about cleanup_pf_zone() in pf_ioctl.c All of the allocated structures using UMA_CREATE() in pfattach() were detroyed using UMA_DESTROY() in cleanup_pf_zone() except for pfr_kentry_pl2. Is there a particular reason why pfr_kentry_pl2 is being left out? -- There are