at was really going on.
>
> F.Y.I.
>
> On 12/29/06, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Friday 29 December 2006 04:07, Earl Lapus wrote:
> > > Just a small query about cleanup_pf_zone() in pf_ioctl.c
> > >
> > > All of the allocated struc
.
Sorry for not giving all the details in my first post.
I just wasn't sure what was really going on.
F.Y.I.
On 12/29/06, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Friday 29 December 2006 04:07, Earl Lapus wrote:
> Just a small query about cleanup_pf_zone() in pf_ioctl.c
>
> All
On Friday 29 December 2006 04:07, Earl Lapus wrote:
> Just a small query about cleanup_pf_zone() in pf_ioctl.c
>
> All of the allocated structures using UMA_CREATE() in pfattach()
> were detroyed using UMA_DESTROY() in cleanup_pf_zone() except
> for pfr_kentry_pl2.
>
> Is ther
hi all,
Just a small query about cleanup_pf_zone() in pf_ioctl.c
All of the allocated structures using UMA_CREATE() in pfattach()
were detroyed using UMA_DESTROY() in cleanup_pf_zone() except
for pfr_kentry_pl2.
Is there a particular reason why pfr_kentry_pl2 is being left out?
--
There are