Cameron,
On Sun, Jun 23, 2013 at 04:22:54PM +1000, Cameron Simpson wrote:
C> On 23Jun2013 00:55, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
C> | Things are just different for quite a while now and they are growing
C> | even more differently.
C>
C> Just a small related thing: are underlying things compatible? Sp
On 23Jun2013 00:55, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
| Things are just different for quite a while now and they are growing
| even more differently.
Just a small related thing: are underlying things compatible? Specificly I am
wondering can I CARP and pfsync between FreeBSD and OpenBSD?
--
Cameron Simps
On 23 Jun 2013, at 00:55, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
> On 06/22/2013 10:41 PM, Stan Gammons wrote:
>> On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 20:51 +0200, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
>>> It seems that people think that pf is unmaintained.
>>> Quite a disheartening thing for the person that did the hard work
>>> to cre
On 06/22/2013 10:41 PM, Stan Gammons wrote:
On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 20:51 +0200, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
It seems that people think that pf is unmaintained.
Quite a disheartening thing for the person that did the hard work
to create the smp-friendly pf in FreeBSD-10...
My apologies Nikos for th
On 22/06/2013 21:41, Stan Gammons wrote:
> On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 20:51 +0200, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
>> It seems that people think that pf is unmaintained.
>> Quite a disheartening thing for the person that did the hard work
>> to create the smp-friendly pf in FreeBSD-10...
> My apologies Nikos f
On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 20:51 +0200, Nikos Vassiliadis wrote:
> It seems that people think that pf is unmaintained.
> Quite a disheartening thing for the person that did the hard work
> to create the smp-friendly pf in FreeBSD-10...
My apologies Nikos for thinking PF is not maintained.
I was hoping
