> On 06/06/07 16:29, Max Laier wrote:
>> After several attempts to fix user/group rules which ended like the most
>> recent one - cited below - with *ZERO* feedback, I won't waste anymore
>> effort. Either somebody steps up, does proper testing and reports back,
>> or user/group rules go! End
On 06/06/07 16:29, Max Laier wrote:
> After several attempts to fix user/group rules which ended like the most
> recent one - cited below - with *ZERO* feedback, I won't waste anymore
> effort. Either somebody steps up, does proper testing and reports back,
> or user/group rules go! End of sto
On 06/06/07 16:29, Max Laier wrote:
> After several attempts to fix user/group rules which ended like the most
> recent one - cited below - with *ZERO* feedback, I won't waste anymore
> effort. Either somebody steps up, does proper testing and reports back,
> or user/group rules go! End of sto
On Wed, 6 Jun 2007, Max Laier wrote:
> After several attempts to fix user/group rules which ended like the most
> recent one - cited below - with *ZERO* feedback, I won't waste anymore
> effort. Either somebody steps up, does proper testing and reports back,
> or user/group rules go! End of s
On 06.06-16:29, Max Laier wrote:
[ ... ]
> and again ... the thread ends here - zero feedback received :-( Does
> anyone care about user/group rules at all? If so - speak up now or I'll
> just disable them with the upcoming update!!!
i'm afraid after loosing two systems to processor and memory
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 05:04:34PM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
> Hi Tillman,
>
> On Wednesday 06 June 2007, Tillman Hodgson wrote:
> > I think you might have missed some posts :-) I successfully built with
> > that patch and reported it:
>
> ahh ... you dropped -pf@ and myself from the CC-list. -cur
On Wed, Jun 06, 2007 at 04:29:12PM +0200, Max Laier wrote:
> After several attempts to fix user/group rules which ended like the most
> recent one - cited below - with *ZERO* feedback, I won't waste anymore
> effort. Either somebody steps up, does proper testing and reports back,
> or user/grou
On Wednesday 06 June 2007, Chris Marlatt wrote:
> Max Laier wrote:
> > and again ... the thread ends here - zero feedback received :-( Does
> > anyone care about user/group rules at all? If so - speak up now or
> > I'll just disable them with the upcoming update!!!
>
> Unfortunately I can't claim
Hi Tillman,
On Wednesday 06 June 2007, Tillman Hodgson wrote:
> I think you might have missed some posts :-) I successfully built with
> that patch and reported it:
ahh ... you dropped -pf@ and myself from the CC-list. -current is just
too noisy to spot replys. Thanks for the info and sorry fo
Max Laier wrote:
and again ... the thread ends here - zero feedback received :-( Does
anyone care about user/group rules at all? If so - speak up now or I'll
just disable them with the upcoming update!!!
Unfortunately I can't claim to be seeing this symptom, but I do use
user/group rules
After several attempts to fix user/group rules which ended like the most
recent one - cited below - with *ZERO* feedback, I won't waste anymore
effort. Either somebody steps up, does proper testing and reports back,
or user/group rules go! End of story!
This is not personal against Tillman -
11 matches
Mail list logo
