On 10/13/06, B. Cook <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
the "no rdr" needed to be before the rdr statements. It seems that having
the ! it would only take the first network and not the second.
Well, I don't think that's the way it was working.
Negated lists don't work as expected (see the FAQ), but y
On Fri, October 13, 2006 5:13 am, Travis H. wrote:
> I know this has been a while, but I didn't see a proper response in the
> thread.
> I suspect that the gateway is unset or improperly set on the routes
> associated
> with the alias.
>
> I'm not familiar with squidclient, but It looks like all re
I know this has been a while, but I didn't see a proper response in the thread.
I suspect that the gateway is unset or improperly set on the routes associated
with the alias.
I'm not familiar with squidclient, but It looks like all requests are
going through the squid proxy. The common pattern s
Hello,
I'm not sure how to explain this but I will do my best.
I have a FreeBSD 6.1-p7 box running pf.
sis0 10.0.0.87/25
xl0 192.168.1.3/24
gw is 10.0.0.62
pf rules are simple:
public_if ="sis0"
staff_if="xl0"
proxy_server="192.168.1.3"
table const {172.16.10.0/24}
table co
