>
> Some applications in intranet pages use ports like
> 19336 or 8081 and they don't support the proxy.
>
> I need to tell to pf
This is not a pf issue, apart from get rid of
set optimization aggressive
The defaults are more than adequate.
add
set block-policy return
So applications c
On 5/4/06, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Thursday 04 May 2006 05:40, Aguiar Magalhaes wrote:
> I have a lot of Windows Internet Explorer browsers in
> the
> LAN and they are marked to use the proxy at 3128 port.
>
> The pf and squid are in the same machine. I'm not
> using transparent p
Hi,
does lan_to_int includes port 19336 or 8081?
On 5/4/06, Aguiar Magalhaes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
List,
I have a lot of Windows Internet Explorer browsers in
the
LAN and they are marked to use the proxy at 3128 port.
The pf and squid are in the same machine. I'm not
using transparent pro
On Thursday 04 May 2006 05:40, Aguiar Magalhaes wrote:
> I have a lot of Windows Internet Explorer browsers in
> the
> LAN and they are marked to use the proxy at 3128 port.
>
> The pf and squid are in the same machine. I'm not
> using transparent proxy on pf. I don't have any
> redirections to pro
List,
I have a lot of Windows Internet Explorer browsers in
the
LAN and they are marked to use the proxy at 3128 port.
The pf and squid are in the same machine. I'm not
using transparent proxy on pf. I don't have any
redirections to proxy.
Some applications in intranet pages use ports like
19