RE: Something is wrong

2006-05-04 Thread Greg Hennessy
> > Some applications in intranet pages use ports like > 19336 or 8081 and they don't support the proxy. > > I need to tell to pf This is not a pf issue, apart from get rid of set optimization aggressive The defaults are more than adequate. add set block-policy return So applications c

Re: Something is wrong

2006-05-03 Thread Travis H.
On 5/4/06, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: On Thursday 04 May 2006 05:40, Aguiar Magalhaes wrote: > I have a lot of Windows Internet Explorer browsers in > the > LAN and they are marked to use the proxy at 3128 port. > > The pf and squid are in the same machine. I'm not > using transparent p

Re: Something is wrong

2006-05-03 Thread Huzeyfe Onal
Hi, does lan_to_int includes port 19336 or 8081? On 5/4/06, Aguiar Magalhaes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: List, I have a lot of Windows Internet Explorer browsers in the LAN and they are marked to use the proxy at 3128 port. The pf and squid are in the same machine. I'm not using transparent pro

Re: Something is wrong

2006-05-03 Thread Max Laier
On Thursday 04 May 2006 05:40, Aguiar Magalhaes wrote: > I have a lot of Windows Internet Explorer browsers in > the > LAN and they are marked to use the proxy at 3128 port. > > The pf and squid are in the same machine. I'm not > using transparent proxy on pf. I don't have any > redirections to pro

Something is wrong

2006-05-03 Thread Aguiar Magalhaes
List, I have a lot of Windows Internet Explorer browsers in the LAN and they are marked to use the proxy at 3128 port. The pf and squid are in the same machine. I'm not using transparent proxy on pf. I don't have any redirections to proxy. Some applications in intranet pages use ports like 19