On Mon, Jun 15, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Doug Barton wrote:
> Gert Doering wrote:
>> Hi Doug,
>>
>> thanks for taking this up - and sorry for not responding more timely.
>>
>> I can't answer all the questions but might have a yet-unmentioned idea
>> that could solve all this in one go :-)
>>
>> On Mon, Ju
Gert Doering wrote:
> Hi Doug,
>
> thanks for taking this up - and sorry for not responding more timely.
>
> I can't answer all the questions but might have a yet-unmentioned idea
> that could solve all this in one go :-)
>
> On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 11:38:45AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
>> 2. The
Hi Doug,
thanks for taking this up - and sorry for not responding more timely.
I can't answer all the questions but might have a yet-unmentioned idea
that could solve all this in one go :-)
On Mon, Jun 01, 2009 at 11:38:45AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote:
> 2. The previous rcorder for the pf script w
Max Laier wrote:
> On Monday 01 June 2009 20:38:45 Doug Barton wrote:
>> Howdy,
>>
>> As you can see below, I've made a change to the order of execution of
>> the rc.d scripts in 8-current (soon to be 8-release) to run all of the
>> firewalls, including pf, before the network is up. However the
>>
On Monday 01 June 2009 20:38:45 Doug Barton wrote:
> Howdy,
>
> As you can see below, I've made a change to the order of execution of
> the rc.d scripts in 8-current (soon to be 8-release) to run all of the
> firewalls, including pf, before the network is up. However the
> following PR gives an exa
