On 16 Feb 2011, at 21:59, "kevin" wrote:
>> If you only have one gateway, then you have nothing to worry about for
>> this part.
>
> They provide a gateway address for each subnet they allocate to me -- which
> probably is assigned to the same device for them, but I would need to
> establish th
>If you only have one gateway, then you have nothing to worry about for
>this part.
They provide a gateway address for each subnet they allocate to me -- which
probably is assigned to the same device for them, but I would need to
establish these rules in my freebsd firewall , correct?
>If you ex
On 2/16/11 5:01 PM, kevin wrote:
>> If you have only 1 upstream interconnection, this won't be a problem for
>> you.
>
> These boxes are in a collocation facility, in a data center. There are
> multiple upstream providers, but I am using the data center's default
> gateways for each allocated subn
>If you have only 1 upstream interconnection, this won't be a problem for
>you.
These boxes are in a collocation facility, in a data center. There are
multiple upstream providers, but I am using the data center's default
gateways for each allocated subnet. So I imagine the routing to the multiple
On 2/15/11 7:27 PM, kevin wrote:
> I have a generally simplistic question about a potential scenario for a
> FreeBSD PF with multiple gateways/routes.
>
>
>
> The backend network would not consist of local or private ip addresses -
> every device will have a public IP. There will be about 7 pu
Hello,
I have a generally simplistic question about a potential scenario for a
FreeBSD PF with multiple gateways/routes.
The backend network would not consist of local or private ip addresses -
every device will have a public IP. There will be about 7 public subnets
that will be handled by
