On 30/12/2009 01:35, kevin wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Tom Judge
>> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 1:20 PM
>> To: Kevin
>> Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
>> Subject: Re: PF Transparent Bridge Firewall + CARP
>>
>>
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Judge
> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 1:20 PM
> To: Kevin
> Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: PF Transparent Bridge Firewall + CARP
>
>[router]
> |
> [--switch 1--]
> |
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin wrote:
>
>
>
> My environment would be better described as the following :
>
>[router]
> |
> [--switch 1 [vlan1]--]
> ||
> [FW1]--{pfsync}--[FW2]
> ||
> [--switch 1 [vlan2]
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom Judge
> Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2009 1:20 PM
> To: Kevin
> Cc: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
> Subject: Re: PF Transparent Bridge Firewall + CARP
>
>[router]
> |
> [--switch 1--]
> |
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Kevin wrote:
>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Kevin [mailto:k...@kevinkevin.com]
>> I have what I would consider not a standard firewall scenario that
>> requires a second, redundant PF firewall. My first / main firewall is
>> pf + transparen
> -Original Message-
> From: Kevin [mailto:k...@kevinkevin.com]
> I have what I would consider not a standard firewall scenario that
> requires a second, redundant PF firewall. My first / main firewall is
> pf + transparent bridging with no internal network / ip addresses.
I realize tha
Hello,
I have what I would consider not a standard firewall scenario that requires
a second, redundant PF firewall. My first / main firewall is pf +
transparent bridging with no internal network / ip addresses.
I would like to implement a second failover firewall w/ CARP and have a
pretty good i
