--- Original message ---
From: "Ermal Lui"
To: "Виталий Владимирович"
Date: 15 November 2011, 11:24:54
Subject: Re: PF + dummynet
> 2011/11/14 Виталий Владимирович :
> >
> >
> > --- Original message ---
> > From: "Ermal L
2011/11/14 Виталий Владимирович :
>
>
> --- Original message ---
> From: "Ermal Lu i"
> To: "Виталий Владимирович"
> Date: 14 November 2011, 19:15:31
> Subject: Re: PF + dummynet
>
>
>
>> 2011/11/14 Виталий Владимирович :
>> &g
--- Original message ---
From: "Ermal Lui"
To: "Виталий Владимирович"
Date: 14 November 2011, 19:15:31
Subject: Re: PF + dummynet
> 2011/11/14 Виталий Владимирович :
> >
> > Hi.
> > Some years ago I have read in freebsd-pf@ that exist p
2011/11/14 Виталий Владимирович :
>
> Hi.
> Some years ago I have read in freebsd-pf@ that exist patch PF+dummynet from
> eri@. Now I am searching on Internet but nothing except this: pfsense-tools /
> patches / RELENG_9_0 on GitHUB. Is anybody use it with FreeBSD 9? I
Hi.
Some years ago I have read in freebsd-pf@ that exist patch PF+dummynet from
eri@. Now I am searching on Internet but nothing except this: pfsense-tools /
patches / RELENG_9_0 on GitHUB. Is anybody use it with FreeBSD 9? I have
applied dummynet.RELENG_9.diff but without results
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Peter Jeremy
wrote:
> [This is fairly old but has recently bubbled to the top of my TODO list]
>
> On 2011-Jul-13 23:35:44 +0800, Ermal Luçi wrote:
>>I reverted back from having the pipes configured in pfctl because it
>>will be a catching game with ipfw.
>>To me
[This is fairly old but has recently bubbled to the top of my TODO list]
On 2011-Jul-13 23:35:44 +0800, Ermal Luçi wrote:
>I reverted back from having the pipes configured in pfctl because it
>will be a catching game with ipfw.
>To me it seems quite awkward that you cannot use ipfw to do all the
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 3:00 AM, Peter Jeremy
wrote:
> On 2011-Jun-29 16:26:34 +0800, Ermal Luçi wrote:
>>On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Peter Jeremy
>> wrote:
>>> Has anyone adapted the PF+dummynet patches for 8.x or 9.x?
>>
>>Well the patch is this
>&
On 2011-Jun-29 16:26:34 +0800, Ermal Luçi wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Peter Jeremy
> wrote:
>> Has anyone adapted the PF+dummynet patches for 8.x or 9.x?
>
>Well the patch is this
>https://github.com/bsdperimeter/pfsense-tools/blob/master/patches/RELENG_8_1/dummy
t;http://cvs.pfsense.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/tools/patches/RELENG_7/
>
> I'm looking at upgrading my PF+dummynet boxes from 7.x to 8.x and
> notice that there have been significant change along the way. I
> had a look at cvs.pfsense.org and it doesn't look like those patches
&
e
>>http://cvs.pfsense.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/tools/patches/RELENG_7/
>
> I'm looking at upgrading my PF+dummynet boxes from 7.x to 8.x and
> notice that there have been significant change along the way. I
> had a look at cvs.pfsense.org and it doesn't look like those patches
&
/RELENG_7/dummynet.RELENG_7.diff?rev=1.5
>
>The problem that is that i have yet to find time to post it here but
>since you have interes here it is.
>Its problem is that from the whole patches here
>http://cvs.pfsense.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/tools/patches/RELENG_7/
I'm looking at upgrading
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 7:03 AM, Peter Jeremy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-Oct-27 19:45:59 +, Ermal Luçi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Attached is the patch against -CURRENT for integrating PF with dummynet!
>>
>>It gives full dummynet support in pf.conf syntax and removes dummynet
>>depn
On 2007-Oct-27 19:45:59 +, Ermal Luçi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Attached is the patch against -CURRENT for integrating PF with dummynet!
>
>It gives full dummynet support in pf.conf syntax and removes dummynet
>depndency to ipfw.
I've recently found this and applied it to 7.1-PRERELEASE. Th
Ermal Luçi wrote:
> Ok thanks to remko@ for hosting it!
>
> You can find it here:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~remko/patches/dummynet_pf.tar.gz
>
> Please test and give feedback.
I am really interested in your patch and hope that I will soon have time to
test it.
Meanwhile, I would like to ask
Attached is the patch against -CURRENT for integrating PF with dummynet!
It gives full dummynet support in pf.conf syntax and removes dummynet
depndency to ipfw.
You can configure a pipe/queue using the same ipfw syntax the only
difference is that i call those 'dnpipe'/'dnqueue' respectivley.
GRE
16 matches
Mail list logo
