On 1/28/11 11:29 AM, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> On 1/27/11 10:44 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
>>
>> The 8.X kernel is NOT single-threaded. Anything but. And the stack has
>> also been improved, I believe there are still bottlenecks but its far better
>> than the old days.
>>
>> The igb driver in 8.2 creates
On 1/27/11 9:58 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
> Kernel folks should be able to talk about this in detail, but my
> understanding is that the kernel itself supports multiple threads, but
> the question is whether or not the drivers or relevant "pieces" (e.g.
> igb(4) driver, pf, TCP stack, etc.) s
On 1/27/11 10:44 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
>
> The 8.X kernel is NOT single-threaded. Anything but. And the stack has
> also been improved, I believe there are still bottlenecks but its far better
> than the old days.
>
> The igb driver in 8.2 creates up to 8 queues on the right hardware, they
> are
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 12:58 PM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 09:38:22PM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> > On 1/27/11 8:57 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> >
>
> <...snipping out stuff...>
>
> > We're also considering moving to faster machines but I don't think that
> > will hel
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 09:38:22PM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> On 1/27/11 8:57 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>
<...snipping out stuff...>
> We're also considering moving to faster machines but I don't think that
> will help much with our problem.
>
> I suppose additional CPU cores will be of
On 1/27/11 9:02 PM, Jack Vogel wrote:
> If you go to 8.2 and the latest driver you will get better stats also,
> ahem...
>
> Jack
>
We'll be doing that as soon as 8.2 hits release, as opposed to
prerelease/rc.
Can never be too careful with this one project, outtages would be costly -.-
On 1/27/11 8:57 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:39:40PM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 1/27/11 7:46 PM, Sergey Lobanov wrote:
>>> В сообщении от Пятница 28 января 2011 00:55:35 автор Damien Fleuriot
>>> написал:
On 1/27/11 6:41 PM, Vogel, Jack wrote:
>
If you go to 8.2 and the latest driver you will get better stats also,
ahem...
Jack
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 11:57 AM, Jeremy Chadwick
wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:39:40PM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> >
> >
> > On 1/27/11 7:46 PM, Sergey Lobanov wrote:
> > > В сообщении от Пятница 28 я
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 08:39:40PM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
>
> On 1/27/11 7:46 PM, Sergey Lobanov wrote:
> > В сообщении от Пятница 28 января 2011 00:55:35 автор Damien Fleuriot
> > написал:
> >> On 1/27/11 6:41 PM, Vogel, Jack wrote:
> >>> Jeremy is right, if you have a problem the firs
On 1/27/11 7:46 PM, Sergey Lobanov wrote:
> В сообщении от Пятница 28 января 2011 00:55:35 автор Damien Fleuriot написал:
>> On 1/27/11 6:41 PM, Vogel, Jack wrote:
>>> Jeremy is right, if you have a problem the first step is to try the
>>> latest code.
>>>
>>> However, when I look at the interrup
-
From: Damien Fleuriot [mailto:m...@my.gd]
Sent: Thursday, January 27, 2011 9:31 AM
To: Jeremy Chadwick
Cc: freebsd-sta...@freebsd.org; freebsd-pf@freebsd.org; Vogel, Jack
Subject: Re: High interrupt rate on a PF box + performance
On 1/27/11 6:27 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27,
On 1/27/11 6:41 PM, Vogel, Jack wrote:
> Jeremy is right, if you have a problem the first step is to try the latest
> code.
>
> However, when I look at the interrupts below I don't see what the problem is?
> The Broadcom seems to have about the same rate, it just doesn't have MSIX
> (multiple
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 06:31:29PM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>
>
> On 1/27/11 6:27 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:57:14AM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> >> Hello list,
> >>
> >> I have a problem with interrupts, network cards, and PF performance.
> >>
> >> We have
On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:57:14AM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
> Hello list,
>
> I have a problem with interrupts, network cards, and PF performance.
>
> We have 2 firewalls running FreeBSD 8.0 for the current master and
> FreeBSD 8.1 for the backup host, which I upgraded just yesterday.
>
> [.
On 1/27/11 6:37 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 06:31:29PM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 1/27/11 6:27 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:57:14AM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
Hello list,
I have a problem with interrupts, netwo
On 1/27/11 6:27 PM, Jeremy Chadwick wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 27, 2011 at 10:57:14AM +0100, Damien Fleuriot wrote:
>> Hello list,
>>
>> I have a problem with interrupts, network cards, and PF performance.
>>
>> We have 2 firewalls running FreeBSD 8.0 for the current master and
>> FreeBSD 8.1 for the b
On 1/27/11 11:03 AM, Bartosz Stec wrote:
> W dniu 2011-01-27 10:57, Damien Fleuriot pisze:
>> Hello list,
>>
>> I have a problem with interrupts, network cards, and PF performance.
>>
> I think you should try with polling(4) enabled and probably increase
> kernel.hz i sysctl.conf :)
>
As a mat
W dniu 2011-01-27 10:57, Damien Fleuriot pisze:
Hello list,
I have a problem with interrupts, network cards, and PF performance.
I think you should try with polling(4) enabled and probably increase
kernel.hz i sysctl.conf :)
--
Bartosz Stec
___
f
Hello list,
I have a problem with interrupts, network cards, and PF performance.
We have 2 firewalls running FreeBSD 8.0 for the current master and
FreeBSD 8.1 for the backup host, which I upgraded just yesterday.
The servers use CARP for redundancy.
These are rather busy boxes which run PF
19 matches
Mail list logo
