On Tue, 30 Sep 2008, Max Laier wrote:
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 00:02:04 Robert Watson wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, Max Laier wrote:
Please help testing. It's been confirmed to work for IPFW, let's make
sure pf is in good shape, too. Thanks.
A casual glance at pf.c suggests that pf(4) d
On Tuesday 30 September 2008 00:02:04 Robert Watson wrote:
> On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, Max Laier wrote:
> > Please help testing. It's been confirmed to work for IPFW, let's make
> > sure pf is in good shape, too. Thanks.
>
> A casual glance at pf.c suggests that pf(4) doesn't suffer from the "look
> u
On Mon, 29 Sep 2008, Max Laier wrote:
Please help testing. It's been confirmed to work for IPFW, let's make sure
pf is in good shape, too. Thanks.
A casual glance at pf.c suggests that pf(4) doesn't suffer from the "look up
the inpcb even though it's passed down if the socket pointer is NU
Please help testing. It's been confirmed to work for IPFW, let's make sure pf
is in good shape, too. Thanks.
-- Forwarded Message --
Subject: Please test ipfw and pf uid/gid/jail rules
Date: Monday 29 September 2008
From: Robert Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED
