On Tuesday 23 August 2005 14:11, Sergey Lapin wrote:
> On 8/22/05, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > On Monday 15 August 2005 17:43, Daniel Hartmeier wrote:
> > > Please try Max' patch, it is correct. Now I remember when we had the
> > > same problem in OpenBSD, I simply forgot about it. Max
On 8/22/05, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On Monday 15 August 2005 17:43, Daniel Hartmeier wrote:
> > Please try Max' patch, it is correct. Now I remember when we had the
> > same problem in OpenBSD, I simply forgot about it. Max' patch will solve
> > it, I'm quite sure :)
>
> I haven't s
On Monday 15 August 2005 17:43, Daniel Hartmeier wrote:
> Please try Max' patch, it is correct. Now I remember when we had the
> same problem in OpenBSD, I simply forgot about it. Max' patch will solve
> it, I'm quite sure :)
I haven't seen any report (for the good or otherwise) if this really fix
Daniel Hartmeier wrote:
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 08:06:03PM +0400, Sergey Lapin wrote:
And as for other bugs - return to wrong place and NAT from wrong interface?
#2 is serious
http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-pf@freebsd.org/msg00421.html
Repeat it on 6.0RC and provide the smallest
On Mon, Aug 15, 2005 at 08:06:03PM +0400, Sergey Lapin wrote:
> And as for other bugs - return to wrong place and NAT from wrong interface?
> #2 is serious
> http://www.mail-archive.com/freebsd-pf@freebsd.org/msg00421.html
Repeat it on 6.0RC and provide the smallest ruleset that reproduces it
com
On 8/15/05, Daniel Hartmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Please try Max' patch, it is correct. Now I remember when we had the
> same problem in OpenBSD, I simply forgot about it. Max' patch will solve
> it, I'm quite sure :)
>
> Daniel
>
I'm testing it right now. For now, no problems. Maybe time
Please try Max' patch, it is correct. Now I remember when we had the
same problem in OpenBSD, I simply forgot about it. Max' patch will solve
it, I'm quite sure :)
Daniel
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/f
-- Forwarded message --
From: Dmitry Andrianov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Aug 15, 2005 7:31 PM
Subject: RE: Fwd: Dual-feed: PF setup troubles
To: Sergey Lapin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Max Laier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Daniel Hartmeier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Hi.
>
On Monday 15 August 2005 16:34, Daniel Hartmeier wrote:
> I suspect the loop occurs through sys/net/if_ethersubr.c ether_output()
> You route-to the broadcast packet, pf will call ether_output() to send
> it out through the new interface, and this piece of code in there will
> send it right back in
I suspect the loop occurs through sys/net/if_ethersubr.c ether_output()
/*
* If a simplex interface, and the packet is being sent to our
* Ethernet address or a broadcast address, loopback a copy.
* XXX To make a simplex device behave exactly like a duplex
Sorry, forgot to write to list.
-- Forwarded message --
From: Sergey Lapin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Aug 15, 2005 3:17 PM
Subject: Re: Dual-feed: PF setup troubles
To: Hexren <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I think, it's troublesome...
http://www.mail-archive.com/freeb
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
> Hi there!
> I've got two internet connections with two different ISP's and would
> like to use one for my own use, while the other serves various
> services from various servers inside my network and directly on the
> firewall.
> Both two conn
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi there!
I've got two internet connections with two different ISP's and would
like to use one for my own use, while the other serves various
services from various servers inside my network and directly on the
firewall.
Both two connections end up a
13 matches
Mail list logo
