Re: Connmark target

2009-06-08 Thread Ermal Luçi
On Mon, Jun 8, 2009 at 10:53 PM, David DeSimone wrote: > v...@tesla.cujae.edu.cu wrote: >> >> by the way, anyone knows if there are plans to include connection mark >> capabilities to pf. >> >> i say this because until now is the only way i´ve found to solve my >> issue. > > I think the real quest

Re: Connmark target

2009-06-08 Thread David DeSimone
v...@tesla.cujae.edu.cu wrote: > > by the way, anyone knows if there are plans to include connection mark > capabilities to pf. > > i say this because until now is the only way i´ve found to solve my > issue. I think the real question is whether tags become part of connection "state". For instan

Re: Connmark target

2009-06-07 Thread vila
t 6:15 PM, wrote: Ermal Luçi ha escrito: On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:49 PM, wrote: Vlad Galu ha escrito: On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 5:57 AM, wrote: Hi folks! I´m trying to figure out if there is a way to make connection marking in a similar way as the iptables´s CONNMARK target does?

Re: Connmark target

2009-06-06 Thread István
raffic shapping. > > regards, > evelio vila > > > > > >> >> >> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:15 PM, wrote: >> >> Ermal Luçi ha escrito: >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:49 PM, wrote: >>> >>>>

Re: Connmark target

2009-06-06 Thread vila
PM, wrote: Vlad Galu ha escrito: On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 5:57 AM, wrote: Hi folks! I´m trying to figure out if there is a way to make connection marking in a similar way as the iptables´s CONNMARK target does? Does pf supports this feature? My intentions are to tag an outgoing packet, t

Re: Connmark target

2009-06-06 Thread vila
make connection marking in a similar way as the iptables´s CONNMARK target does? Does pf supports this feature? My intentions are to tag an outgoing packet, transfer the tag to the hole connection and then use that tag to mark incoming packets belonging to the same connection. Also, i would like th

Re: Connmark target

2009-06-06 Thread vila
Ermal Luçi ha escrito: On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:49 PM, wrote: Vlad Galu ha escrito: On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 5:57 AM, wrote: Hi folks! I´m trying to figure out if there is a way to make connection marking in a similar way as the iptables´s CONNMARK target does? Does pf supports this

Re: Connmark target

2009-06-06 Thread Ermal Luçi
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 6:49 PM, wrote: > Vlad Galu ha escrito: > >> On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 5:57 AM, wrote: >>> >>> Hi folks! >>> >>> I´m trying to figure out if there is a way to make connection marking in >>> a >>> similar wa

Re: Connmark target

2009-06-06 Thread vila
Vlad Galu ha escrito: On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 5:57 AM, wrote: Hi folks! I´m trying to figure out if there is a way to make connection marking in a similar way as the iptables´s CONNMARK target does? Does pf supports this feature? My intentions are to tag an outgoing packet, transfer the

Re: Connmark target

2009-06-05 Thread Vlad Galu
On Sat, Jun 6, 2009 at 5:57 AM, wrote: > Hi folks! > > I´m trying to figure out if there is a way to make connection marking in a > similar way as the iptables´s CONNMARK target does? > > Does pf supports this feature? > > My intentions are to tag an outgoing packet, tran

Connmark target

2009-06-05 Thread vila
Hi folks! I´m trying to figure out if there is a way to make connection marking in a similar way as the iptables´s CONNMARK target does? Does pf supports this feature? My intentions are to tag an outgoing packet, transfer the tag to the hole connection and then use that tag to mark