On Wed, Mar 04, 2020 at 11:03:09AM +0100, Kristof Provost wrote:
> It might be more interesting to look at dummynet.
> Last year there was a GSoC proposal (in FreeBSD) to port dummynet to pf.
> Sadly the project wasn’t selected, but I believe the student did spend some
> time on investigating it.
>
On 29 Feb 2020, at 0:35, Sean Yeh wrote:
Hi FreeBSD-pf members,
I hope you guys are enjoying your weekend!
I was wondering if any of you happened to know if the code for the
ALTQ
feature of pf could be separated and used for NetBSD's pf function.
I'm
currently investigating methods to improve
On Sat, 29 Feb 2020 05:27:42 -0800 Sean Yeh sean.yeh...@gmail.com said
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 8:37 PM Chris wrote:
> On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 15:35:23 -0800 Sean Yeh sean.yeh...@gmail.com said
>
> > Hi FreeBSD-pf members,
> >
> > I hope you guys are enjoying your weekend!
> >
> > I was wondering i
Hi Chris (and FreeBSD-pf members),
Thanks for the advice!
Truth be told, I am quite lost right now. But before I give up, could you
please point me in the right direction?
1) Figuring out if ALTQ is separable from pf is a little abstract to me.
Is there a definitive experiment to perform to answ
On Fri, 28 Feb 2020 15:35:23 -0800 Sean Yeh sean.yeh...@gmail.com said
Hi FreeBSD-pf members,
I hope you guys are enjoying your weekend!
I was wondering if any of you happened to know if the code for the ALTQ
feature of pf could be separated and used for NetBSD's pf function. I'm
currently inv
Hi FreeBSD-pf members,
I hope you guys are enjoying your weekend!
I was wondering if any of you happened to know if the code for the ALTQ
feature of pf could be separated and used for NetBSD's pf function. I'm
currently investigating methods to improve NetBSD's ALTQ feature, which
hasn't been upd
