Dear all,
In packet filter rule ,there is a text called "tracker" what is use of this?
Can i find syntax of packet filter rules of freebsd.
with regards
ravi
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
Hi,
I have a FreeBSD server (A) with 2 NICs
Each NIC is connected to a different network:
igb0: 10.0.0.10/24
igb1: 10.10.10.10/24
The default gateway on the server is 10.0.0.1
The two networks can communicate using a router (10.0.0.1).
I have a server (B) running on 10.10.10.100 which on
hi i am permanent for more than six months and I don't have any bills I
stay with my parents an I earn R3000 a month do I qualify
please reply ASAP
Thanks
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
https://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To u
Hi all,
I have troubles with running altq on igb cards in freebsd 9.2-release. I
used a patch to fix this in freebsd 8.2 and it works. Then I migrated to
freebsd 9.2 and I expected this bug is fixed there but it isn't. Should I
apply a patch to fix this issue on freebsd9.2 or I missed something?
Hi. Are there still Tata indica's available for 499/month?
Regards
Nicole
Sent from Samsung Mobil
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-pf-unsubscr...@free
> Hiya all,
>
> Could someone clarify for me the purpose of the
> bandwidth parameter when used with hfsc? Please consider my queue (512Kb
> max upload through the ADSL line):
>
> altq on em1 bandwidth 500Kb
> hfsc queue { ack, dns, ssh, other }
> queue ack bandwidth 95%
> priority 8 qli
Hiya all,
Could someone clarify for me the purpose of the
bandwidth parameter when used with hfsc? Please consider my queue (512Kb
max upload through the ADSL line):
altq on em1 bandwidth 500Kb
hfsc queue { ack, dns, ssh, other }
queue ack bandwidth 95%
priority 8 qlimit 500 hfsc (r
Hiya all,
Could someone clarify for me the purpose of the
bandwidth parameter when used with hfsc? Please consider my queue (512Kb
max upload through the ADSL line):
altq on em1 bandwidth 500Kb
hfsc queue { ack, dns, ssh, other }
queue ack bandwidth 95%
priority 8 qlimit 500 hfsc (r
sorry for the disturbing time
i find:
rdr on $if_ext proto tcp from $int_net to port 80 -> \
nat on $if_int inet from to any ->
i nat on the internal interface and it is just working
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.
hi everybody,
my work now is to change a linux firewall with iptables to freebsd/pf/carp
i migrate 6500 lines of iptables with no problem in ten day
there is 400 servers to filter and maybe more in the new datacenter (1400/1700)
the firewall do nat !
they have something like this:
iptables -t n
--- Original Message ---
From: "Kevin K" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'Vitaliy Vladimirovich'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
Date: 3 june, 23:00:32
Subject: RE: (No subject)
You can use tools from ports like trafshow, iftop and pftop to display
3:56 PM
> To: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
> Subject: (No subject)
>
> Hi, All!
>
> I use pfstat on my FreeBSD box and I have some questions:
>
> 1. How can I monitorig not only bandwidth but total upload and download
> data?
> 2 Can I have s
Hi, All!
I use pfstat on my FreeBSD box and I have some questions:
1. How can I monitorig not only bandwidth but total upload and download data?
2 Can I have statistic on each IP from LAN?
TIA
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org ma
dear pf hackers,
i have a simple question about pf's behavior. there is something i
don't understand in this piece of code :
http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/source/contrib/pf/net/pf.c#L2971
2971 inp = in_pcblookup_hash(pi, saddr->v4,
sport,daddr->v4,
2972
Здравствуйте, freebsd-pf.
--
С уважением,
BlackTemplares &nb= sp;
[1]mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] mbler.ru
References
1. 3D"mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/lis
set help
set show
--
Kimi
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf
To unsubscribe, send any mail to "[EMAIL PROTECTED]"
On Tuesday 31 May 2005 16.53, steve Rieger wrote:
> whilst i am not here to yell at you.
then why are you?
>
> you have no idea what you are talking about.
And as shown below neither do you
>
> i work for one of the largest stock exchanges in the world and we use
> vrrp on 73 servers to server
On May 31, 2005, at 10:01 AM, Brad Davis wrote:
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 09:20:59AM -0400, steve Rieger wrote:
On May 31, 2005, at 7:14 AM, Sunil Sunder Raj wrote:
Hi,
I have 3 smtp servers 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 under a cluster
with the load balancing done by 10.0.0.1. The pf rule on
> > people use CARP for this, don't they?
>
> No.. This is not what CARP does. CARP is for redundant
> firewalls/routers.
>
CARP can also be utilised for SLB.
___
freebsd-pf@freebsd.org mailing list
http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebs
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 07:58:50AM -0600, Brad Davis wrote:
> No.. This is not what CARP does. CARP is for redundant firewalls/routers.
That's just one of it's uses. Take a look at
http://www.countersiege.com/doc/pfsync-carp/
and scroll down to the example about load balancing, then see carp(
On 5/31/05, Brad Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > people use CARP for this, don't they?
> No.. This is not what CARP does. CARP is for redundant firewalls/routers.
CARP is for sharing one IP between multiple hosts/NICs.
pfsync is for edundant PFs.
Do yourself a favor, RTFM some.
http://openbsd.
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 09:20:59AM -0400, steve Rieger wrote:
>
> On May 31, 2005, at 7:14 AM, Sunil Sunder Raj wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >I have 3 smtp servers 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 under a cluster
> >with the load balancing done by 10.0.0.1. The pf rule on 10.0.0.1 is
> >
> >ext_if="fxp0"
> >in
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 03:05:59PM +0200, Daniel Gerzo wrote:
> Hi Sunil,
>
> Tuesday, May 31, 2005, 1:14:26 PM, you Cannot open file "C\TXT
> COOKIES\reply-en.txt"::
>
> > Hi,
> > I have 3 smtp servers 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 under a cluster with the
> > load balancing done by 10.0.0.1. Th
On May 31, 2005, at 7:14 AM, Sunil Sunder Raj wrote:
Hi,
I have 3 smtp servers 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 under a cluster
with the load balancing done by 10.0.0.1. The pf rule on 10.0.0.1 is
ext_if="fxp0"
internal_smtp_servers="{ 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 }"
rdr on $ext_if proto tcp fro
On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 11:14:26AM +, Sunil Sunder Raj wrote:
> Hi,
> I have 3 smtp servers 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 under a cluster with the
> load balancing done by 10.0.0.1. The pf rule on 10.0.0.1 is
>
> ext_if="fxp0"
> internal_smtp_servers="{ 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 }"
> rdr on
Hi Sunil,
Tuesday, May 31, 2005, 1:14:26 PM, you Cannot open file "C\TXT
COOKIES\reply-en.txt"::
> Hi,
> I have 3 smtp servers 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 under a cluster with the
> load balancing done by 10.0.0.1. The pf rule on 10.0.0.1 is
> ext_if="fxp0"
> internal_smtp_servers="{ 10.0.0.2,
Hi,
I have 3 smtp servers 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 under a cluster with the
load balancing done by 10.0.0.1. The pf rule on 10.0.0.1 is
ext_if="fxp0"
internal_smtp_servers="{ 10.0.0.2, 10.0.0.3, 10.0.0.4 }"
rdr on $ext_if proto tcp from any to any port 25 -> $internal_smtp_servers
round-ro
28 matches
Mail list logo
