On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Peter Jeremy
wrote:
> [This is fairly old but has recently bubbled to the top of my TODO list]
>
> On 2011-Jul-13 23:35:44 +0800, Ermal Luçi wrote:
>>I reverted back from having the pipes configured in pfctl because it
>>will be a catching game with ipfw.
>>To me
[This is fairly old but has recently bubbled to the top of my TODO list]
On 2011-Jul-13 23:35:44 +0800, Ermal Luçi wrote:
>I reverted back from having the pipes configured in pfctl because it
>will be a catching game with ipfw.
>To me it seems quite awkward that you cannot use ipfw to do all the
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 3:00 AM, Peter Jeremy
wrote:
> On 2011-Jun-29 16:26:34 +0800, Ermal Luçi wrote:
>>On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Peter Jeremy
>> wrote:
>>> Has anyone adapted the PF+dummynet patches for 8.x or 9.x?
>>
>>Well the patch is this
>>https://github.com/bsdperimeter/pfsense-to
On 2011-Jun-29 16:26:34 +0800, Ermal Luçi wrote:
>On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Peter Jeremy
> wrote:
>> Has anyone adapted the PF+dummynet patches for 8.x or 9.x?
>
>Well the patch is this
>https://github.com/bsdperimeter/pfsense-tools/blob/master/patches/RELENG_8_1/dummynet.RELENG_8.diff
>It
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 6:42 AM, Peter Jeremy
wrote:
> Following up on some very old mail...
>
> On 2008-Nov-04 16:53:52 +0100, Ermal Luçi wrote:
>>actually this is the latest against RELENG_7 which is confirmed to
>>work with full features of pf(4) like route-to/reply-to etc...
>>http://cvs.pfse
On Wed, Jun 29, 2011 at 12:42 AM, Peter Jeremy
wrote:
> Following up on some very old mail...
>
> On 2008-Nov-04 16:53:52 +0100, Ermal Luçi wrote:
>>actually this is the latest against RELENG_7 which is confirmed to
>>work with full features of pf(4) like route-to/reply-to etc...
>>http://cvs.pfs
Following up on some very old mail...
On 2008-Nov-04 16:53:52 +0100, Ermal Luçi wrote:
>actually this is the latest against RELENG_7 which is confirmed to
>work with full features of pf(4) like route-to/reply-to etc...
>http://cvs.pfsense.org/cgi-bin/cvsweb.cgi/tools/patches/RELENG_7/dummynet.REL
On Mon, Nov 3, 2008 at 7:03 AM, Peter Jeremy
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 2007-Oct-27 19:45:59 +, Ermal Luçi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>Attached is the patch against -CURRENT for integrating PF with dummynet!
>>
>>It gives full dummynet support in pf.conf syntax and removes dummynet
>>depn
On 2007-Oct-27 19:45:59 +, Ermal Luçi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Attached is the patch against -CURRENT for integrating PF with dummynet!
>
>It gives full dummynet support in pf.conf syntax and removes dummynet
>depndency to ipfw.
I've recently found this and applied it to 7.1-PRERELEASE. Th
Ermal Luçi wrote:
> Ok thanks to remko@ for hosting it!
>
> You can find it here:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~remko/patches/dummynet_pf.tar.gz
>
> Please test and give feedback.
I am really interested in your patch and hope that I will soon have time to
test it.
Meanwhile, I would like to ask
Attached is the patch against -CURRENT for integrating PF with dummynet!
It gives full dummynet support in pf.conf syntax and removes dummynet
depndency to ipfw.
You can configure a pipe/queue using the same ipfw syntax the only
difference is that i call those 'dnpipe'/'dnqueue' respectivley.
GRE
11 matches
Mail list logo
