W dniu 09.02.2021 o 15:55, Kristof Provost pisze:
On 9 Feb 2021, at 15:50, Marek Zarychta wrote:
Dear list,
I am observing changed behaviour of the rule "set skip on lo". This
rule previously allowed for communication between the host and the
jail no only on loopback interfaces, but also on s
On 9 Feb 2021, at 15:50, Marek Zarychta wrote:
Dear list,
I am observing changed behaviour of the rule "set skip on lo". This
rule previously allowed for communication between the host and the
jail no only on loopback interfaces, but also on shared network
interfaces, for example, if a host h
Dear list,
I am observing changed behaviour of the rule "set skip on lo". This rule
previously allowed for communication between the host and the jail no
only on loopback interfaces, but also on shared network interfaces, for
example, if a host had address x.x.x.x/24 and jail had address
x.x.
